Big East

Villanova

18-16NET#35Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #41Coach: Kyle Neptune

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	1,996	1,014	4.7—	108.2—	103.5—	50.0%—	27.3%—	15.0%—	27.1%—	48.6%—	71.7%—	16.4%—	26.2%—
DixonE. DixonBambaT. BambaBurtonT. BurtonArmstrongM. ArmstrongMooreJ. Moore	296	169	19.2—	112.5—	93.3—	53.4%—	22.3%—	12.5%—	21.3%—	47.0%—	73.0%—	18.7%—	10.7%—
LonginoJ. LonginoDixonE. DixonBambaT. BambaBurtonT. BurtonArmstrongM. Armstrong	89	48	-12.1—	90.1—	102.2—	44.0%—	18.2%—	12.4%—	12.0%—	48.7%—	74.0%—	15.9%—	21.5%—
DixonE. DixonBambaT. BambaBurtonT. BurtonMooreJ. MooreHartH. Hart	76	39	24.2—	97.7—	73.4—	49.3%—	23.1%—	17.2%—	14.9%—	37.5%—	74.5%—	23.5%—	30.4%—
LonginoJ. LonginoDixonE. DixonBambaT. BambaBurtonT. BurtonMooreJ. Moore	55	27	31.0—	114.5—	83.4—	46.0%—	40.0%—	14.5%—	38.0%—	40.4%—	79.4%—	13.9%—	14.9%—
DixonE. DixonBambaT. BambaArmstrongM. ArmstrongMooreJ. MooreHartH. Hart	53	31	1.0—	101.7—	100.7—	41.8%—	24.2%—	9.4%—	30.6%—	38.2%—	62.5%—	11.4%—	25.5%—
DixonE. DixonBambaT. BambaHausenB. HausenBurtonT. BurtonMooreJ. Moore	49	27	-18.4—	103.4—	121.8—	47.9%—	39.3%—	20.3%—	14.9%—	52.1%—	75.0%—	2.3%—	14.9%—
DixonE. DixonBambaT. BambaHausenB. HausenArmstrongM. ArmstrongMooreJ. Moore	48	16	-37.5—	100.1—	137.7—	34.1%—	29.4%—	6.3%—	52.3%—	63.6%—	70.6%—	18.5%—	131.8%—
LonginoJ. LonginoDixonE. DixonBambaT. BambaMooreJ. MooreHartH. Hart	48	24	-52.2—	94.7—	146.9—	37.5%—	34.6%—	23.2%—	55.6%—	59.8%—	59.3%—	6.6%—	34.8%—
DixonE. DixonHausenB. HausenArmstrongM. ArmstrongMooreJ. MooreHartH. Hart	47	24	11.9—	125.1—	113.2—	54.5%—	23.1%—	6.4%—	29.5%—	47.6%—	74.1%—	9.1%—	31.7%—
LonginoJ. LonginoDixonE. DixonBambaT. BambaHausenB. HausenHartH. Hart	40	17	34.4—	99.4—	65.0—	45.5%—	35.0%—	22.4%—	33.3%—	32.1%—	78.9%—	25.4%—	17.9%—
DixonE. DixonBambaT. BambaHausenB. HausenArmstrongM. ArmstrongHartH. Hart	40	16	-8.9—	100.6—	109.5—	53.2%—	23.8%—	22.6%—	32.3%—	54.8%—	78.3%—	8.6%—	38.7%—
LonginoJ. LonginoDixonE. DixonBurtonT. BurtonArmstrongM. ArmstrongHartH. Hart	39	19	26.5—	106.8—	80.3—	51.4%—	21.7%—	12.7%—	19.4%—	43.5%—	81.0%—	21.4%—	16.1%—
DixonE. DixonBambaT. BambaHausenB. HausenMooreJ. MooreHartH. Hart	33	15	43.2—	122.0—	78.7—	56.7%—	17.6%—	6.1%—	26.7%—	43.8%—	93.8%—	14.3%—	8.3%—
DixonE. DixonHausenB. HausenBurtonT. BurtonArmstrongM. ArmstrongMooreJ. Moore	32	15	30.6—	119.1—	88.5—	70.8%—	20.0%—	25.1%—	16.7%—	36.0%—	75.0%—	8.0%—	24.0%—
WareL. WareBambaT. BambaHausenB. HausenArmstrongM. ArmstrongHartH. Hart	31	15	44.2—	113.3—	69.0—	55.4%—	28.6%—	16.2%—	14.3%—	39.1%—	81.3%—	29.6%—	13.0%—
LonginoJ. LonginoDixonE. DixonBurtonT. BurtonArmstrongM. ArmstrongMooreJ. Moore	31	18	7.5—	126.8—	119.3—	66.0%—	33.3%—	19.5%—	40.0%—	53.2%—	76.2%—	9.4%—	19.4%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2023-24. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.