Villanova18-16

Big EastCoach: Kyle Neptune

18-16NET#36

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Eric Dixon	1,506	490	75.5%	+12.588	+11.494	−1.156	+3.986	−1.240	−4.896	+3.470	−2.574	−5.510	−1.036	−10.090
TJ Bamba	1,350	645	67.7%	+6.474	−1.444	−7.884	−3.120	+3.480	−0.150	+4.978	−3.078	+3.480	−0.150	−2.262
Justin Moore	1,233	763	61.8%	−12.214	−3.632	+8.610	−2.922	−0.844	−0.250	+3.070	+2.028	−3.024	−2.120	+1.640
Tyler Burton	1,217	779	61.0%	+4.970	−0.348	−5.376	+0.758	+0.254	−0.148	−7.416	+0.840	+2.372	+1.472	−13.696
Mark Armstrong	1,207	788	60.5%	+9.682	+4.874	−4.874	+3.384	−6.010	−4.494	−6.220	−1.262	+1.364	+1.776	−0.552
Hakim Hart	1,055	941	52.9%	−0.946	−0.746	+0.348	−0.644	+0.758	+0.640	+3.170	+0.148	+0.556	−0.446	−1.960
Jordan Longino	906	1,089	45.4%	−7.126	−1.344	+5.820	−0.248	+2.472	+2.318	+2.062	+1.434	−4.812	+1.270	+3.630
Brendan Hausen	866	1,130	43.4%	+2.058	+3.970	+1.940	+2.476	+1.666	+0.542	−1.544	−0.252	+2.070	−2.120	+6.716
Lance Ware	469	1,527	23.5%	−11.316	−7.816	+3.530	−0.644	−0.448	+5.04	−3.632	+2.822	+1.666	+0.356	+4.526

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Eric Dixon	1,506	490	75.5%	7.860	111.056	103.258	50.9%48	27.0%34	13.8%70	27.9%44	48.0%62	70.3%56	16.1%44	23.7%66
TJ Bamba	1,350	645	67.7%	6.858	107.748	100.964	49.0%40	28.4%40	15.0%60	28.7%46	47.6%64	72.8%68	16.4%46	25.5%60
Justin Moore	1,233	763	61.8%	-0.146	106.844	106.948	48.9%40	27.0%34	14.9%60	28.2%46	49.3%54	70.5%56	15.5%40	26.8%56
Tyler Burton	1,217	779	61.0%	6.658	108.148	101.562	50.3%46	27.4%36	15.0%60	24.2%34	48.9%56	72.6%66	17.0%50	21.0%74
Mark Armstrong	1,207	788	60.5%	8.462	110.152	101.662	51.3%50	24.9%26	13.3%72	24.7%34	48.1%60	72.2%64	17.1%50	26.0%58
Hakim Hart	1,055	941	52.9%	4.254	107.948	103.658	49.7%42	27.6%38	15.3%58	28.6%46	48.6%58	71.9%64	16.2%46	25.3%60
Jordan Longino	906	1,089	45.4%	0.848	107.546	106.650	49.9%42	28.6%42	16.2%52	28.2%46	49.3%54	69.0%50	17.0%50	28.2%52
Brendan Hausen	866	1,130	43.4%	5.856	110.454	104.654	51.4%50	28.2%40	15.2%58	26.2%38	48.5%58	72.8%68	15.2%38	30.2%46
Lance Ware	469	1,527	23.5%	-3.940	102.234	106.150	49.5%42	27.0%34	18.8%34	24.3%34	50.7%48	72.9%68	16.6%48	29.5%46

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Eric Dixon	1,506	490	75.5%	-4.738	99.628	104.356	47.1%32	28.2%40	18.6%36	24.5%34	50.5%48	75.8%78	17.1%52	33.7%34
TJ Bamba	1,350	645	67.7%	0.448	109.150	108.744	52.1%56	24.9%26	15.0%60	23.7%32	50.6%48	69.4%52	16.5%46	27.7%54
Justin Moore	1,233	763	61.8%	12.168	110.454	98.370	51.8%54	27.8%38	15.1%60	25.2%36	47.3%64	73.5%70	17.7%56	25.2%60
Tyler Burton	1,217	779	61.0%	1.650	108.448	106.748	49.6%42	27.2%36	15.0%60	31.7%56	48.1%60	70.3%56	15.5%40	34.6%32
Mark Armstrong	1,207	788	60.5%	-1.144	105.342	106.450	48.0%36	30.9%52	17.6%42	30.9%54	49.3%54	70.9%58	15.4%40	26.5%56
Hakim Hart	1,055	941	52.9%	5.256	108.550	103.458	50.3%46	26.9%34	14.7%62	25.4%36	48.5%58	71.4%60	16.6%48	27.3%54
Jordan Longino	906	1,089	45.4%	8.060	108.850	100.864	50.1%46	26.2%32	14.0%68	26.2%38	47.9%62	73.8%72	15.8%42	24.6%64
Brendan Hausen	866	1,130	43.4%	3.854	106.544	102.760	48.9%40	26.6%34	14.8%62	27.7%44	48.6%58	70.8%58	17.3%52	23.4%68
Lance Ware	469	1,527	23.5%	7.460	110.052	102.660	50.1%46	27.4%36	13.8%70	27.9%44	47.9%62	71.3%60	16.3%46	25.1%60

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.