Villanova24-9

Big EastCoach: Kevin Willard

24-9NET#41

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Acaden Lewis	1,665	528	75.9%	−6.726	+0.052	+6.814	−0.446	+0.354	−2.584	−8.512	+1.928	−0.644	−1.426	−6.984
Tyler Perkins	1,622	570	74.0%	−4.634	+0.252	+4.822	−3.816	+3.180	−2.888	−0.350	+3.714	+5.996	−0.936	+1.838
Duke Brennan	1,621	572	73.9%	+15.094	+3.772	−11.394	−0.742	+6.194	−1.574	−0.550	−9.798	−2.924	−0.444	−10.292
Bryce Lindsay	1,551	641	70.8%	+1.256	+5.882	+4.624	+1.870	+2.978	−0.556	+3.872	+0.246	−0.842	−0.936	+1.242
Matt Hodge	1,317	876	60.1%	+8.180	+7.988	−0.250	−0.148	+9.2100	−0.862	+0.656	+0.642	+2.878	−1.130	−8.388
Devin Askew	1,264	928	57.7%	+1.156	−5.224	−6.382	−0.150	−5.98	+1.132	+3.370	−0.656	−0.842	+3.092	+7.912
Malachi Palmer	995	1,197	45.4%	+6.576	+4.876	−1.758	+5.394	−3.024	+1.130	+2.164	−1.162	−2.824	+1.068	+1.540
Braden Pierce	310	1,883	14.1%	−31.42	−20.22	+11.24	−5.68	−10.32	+2.910	−15.72	+8.32	+1.768	−0.640	+7.712
Chris Jeffrey	297	1,895	13.5%	+4.668	+1.560	−3.166	+3.080	−2.528	+2.216	+1.460	−0.252	+0.252	+0.356	+4.524
Tafara Gapare	232	1,960	10.6%	−2.940	−5.324	−2.462	−0.150	−6.66	+1.624	+0.556	−0.960	−4.214	+2.890	+11.56

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Acaden Lewis	1,665	528	75.9%	7.358	114.960	107.650	53.8%58	32.1%60	14.4%62	29.2%40	51.8%46	68.1%40	18.1%64	28.4%60
Tyler Perkins	1,622	570	74.0%	7.760	114.960	107.250	53.0%52	32.7%62	14.2%62	31.1%44	52.4%44	69.9%48	18.2%64	30.6%54
Duke Brennan	1,621	572	73.9%	13.068	115.864	102.962	53.8%56	33.5%66	14.6%60	31.1%44	48.8%60	67.6%38	18.3%66	27.5%62
Bryce Lindsay	1,551	641	70.8%	9.262	116.564	107.350	54.5%60	32.8%62	14.8%58	32.3%48	51.4%48	68.1%40	18.2%64	30.4%54
Matt Hodge	1,317	876	60.1%	12.266	118.068	105.954	53.9%58	35.5%72	14.7%58	31.4%44	51.6%48	69.4%46	18.0%64	26.8%64
Devin Askew	1,264	928	57.7%	9.462	112.654	103.260	53.9%58	29.4%48	15.4%52	32.6%48	51.1%50	67.9%40	19.7%74	33.6%44
Malachi Palmer	995	1,197	45.4%	12.566	117.566	105.056	56.9%70	30.3%52	15.6%52	32.4%48	50.7%52	66.8%38	18.9%70	30.9%52
Braden Pierce	310	1,883	14.1%	-17.920	97.522	115.330	49.1%36	23.2%24	17.4%36	17.6%12	58.4%20	69.7%48	17.9%62	36.7%38
Chris Jeffrey	297	1,895	13.5%	12.968	116.264	103.360	56.5%70	29.8%50	16.8%40	32.4%48	51.2%50	68.4%42	18.7%68	34.0%44
Tafara Gapare	232	1,960	10.6%	6.356	110.148	103.858	53.8%58	26.1%34	16.3%46	31.6%46	50.5%52	64.6%28	20.9%80	40.4%28

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Acaden Lewis	1,665	528	75.9%	14.068	114.860	100.866	54.3%58	31.7%58	16.9%40	37.8%60	49.9%58	68.8%44	19.5%74	35.4%40
Tyler Perkins	1,622	570	74.0%	12.366	114.760	102.462	56.8%70	29.6%50	17.0%40	31.4%44	48.6%62	64.0%26	19.1%70	28.8%58
Duke Brennan	1,621	572	73.9%	-2.042	112.154	114.134	54.4%60	27.4%40	16.1%48	31.5%46	58.6%20	70.5%52	18.7%68	37.7%34
Bryce Lindsay	1,551	641	70.8%	8.160	110.850	102.762	52.6%52	29.9%50	15.3%54	28.5%38	51.2%50	68.8%44	19.0%70	29.2%58
Matt Hodge	1,317	876	60.1%	4.152	110.148	106.054	54.0%58	26.3%36	15.4%52	30.8%44	51.0%50	66.6%32	19.1%72	35.0%42
Devin Askew	1,264	928	57.7%	8.360	117.968	109.644	54.0%58	35.3%70	14.3%62	29.4%40	51.7%46	68.8%44	16.7%54	25.7%68
Malachi Palmer	995	1,197	45.4%	5.956	112.754	106.752	51.6%46	33.3%62	14.4%60	30.3%42	51.9%46	69.6%48	18.0%64	29.4%56
Braden Pierce	310	1,883	14.1%	13.568	117.768	104.258	54.7%62	33.5%66	14.6%60	33.4%50	50.1%52	68.1%40	18.5%68	28.9%58
Chris Jeffrey	297	1,895	13.5%	8.360	114.660	106.452	53.5%56	32.3%60	14.7%58	31.0%44	51.4%48	68.3%42	18.4%66	29.5%56
Tafara Gapare	232	1,960	10.6%	9.262	115.462	106.252	53.9%58	32.7%60	14.8%58	31.1%44	51.4%48	68.8%44	18.1%64	28.9%58

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.