Poss1,912
Net Rtg-7.334
ORtg105.340
DRtg112.734
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 1,912 | 979 | -7.334 | 105.340 | 112.734 | 51.3%50 | 33.1%58 | 20.6%22 | 29.9%50 | 52.4%42 | 67.5%44 | 16.5%46 | 30.9%44 |
| LawalT. LawalPoteatM. PoteatSchuttJ. SchuttJohnsonT. JohnsonHammondB. Hammond | 197 | 111 | 3.654 | 114.662 | 111.040 | 47.3%30 | 38.7%78 | 14.7%64 | 38.3%70 | 52.7%40 | 71.4%60 | 14.9%34 | 22.0%72 |
| LawalT. LawalPoteatM. PoteatRechsteinerB. RechsteinerSchuttJ. SchuttJohnsonT. Johnson | 124 | 66 | 1.550 | 115.464 | 113.932 | 58.5%80 | 46.4%94 | 26.6%4 | 21.7%26 | 58.5%18 | 66.7%38 | 21.7%78 | 33.0%38 |
| LawalT. LawalPoteatM. PoteatYoungJ. YoungJohnsonT. JohnsonHammondB. Hammond | 111 | 65 | -13.726 | 85.58 | 99.270 | 45.0%22 | 26.0%30 | 25.2%6 | 42.5%78 | 39.5%90 | 63.2%28 | 15.8%40 | 46.3%14 |
| LawalT. LawalPoteatM. PoteatRechsteinerB. RechsteinerSchuttJ. SchuttYoungJ. Young | 76 | 37 | -11.728 | 95.120 | 106.850 | 50.8%46 | 28.9%42 | 25.1%8 | 19.4%20 | 55.0%30 | 63.2%26 | 25.0%90 | 28.3%52 |
| PoteatM. PoteatRechsteinerB. RechsteinerSchuttJ. SchuttYoungJ. YoungBurnhamB. Burnham | 58 | 29 | -6.736 | 96.822 | 103.558 | 55.4%68 | 25.9%30 | 27.7%2 | 13.0%8 | 50.0%54 | 71.9%64 | 16.6%46 | 31.9%42 |
| RechsteinerB. RechsteinerYoungJ. YoungBurnhamB. BurnhamWesslerP. WesslerJohnsonT. Johnson | 57 | 29 | 17.376 | 108.148 | 90.884 | 53.6%60 | 30.6%48 | 17.4%44 | 12.7%8 | 42.5%84 | 73.0%68 | 15.7%40 | 20.8%76 |
| RechsteinerB. RechsteinerSchuttJ. SchuttYoungJ. YoungBurnhamB. BurnhamWesslerP. Wessler | 57 | 31 | -20.118 | 96.822 | 116.926 | 43.8%18 | 42.1%88 | 22.9%12 | 14.3%10 | 54.8%30 | 65.6%36 | 16.4%44 | 19.2%80 |
| LawalT. LawalSchuttJ. SchuttBurnhamB. BurnhamJohnsonT. JohnsonHammondB. Hammond | 51 | 24 | -29.110 | 87.610 | 116.726 | 40.0%10 | 30.6%48 | 21.4%18 | 60.0%94 | 51.0%48 | 74.2%74 | 7.7%6 | 17.3%84 |
| LawalT. LawalRechsteinerB. RechsteinerSchuttJ. SchuttBurnhamB. BurnhamJohnsonT. Johnson | 51 | 27 | 16.074 | 114.964 | 98.970 | 56.3%72 | 32.1%56 | 19.8%26 | 50.0%86 | 41.8%84 | 67.7%44 | 14.7%32 | 32.7%40 |
| LawalT. LawalRechsteinerB. RechsteinerSchuttJ. SchuttYoungJ. YoungBurnhamB. Burnham | 50 | 21 | -35.38 | 95.720 | 131.08 | 47.6%32 | 17.2%10 | 13.9%70 | 31.0%52 | 50.0%54 | 50.0%4 | 14.8%34 | 65.0%4 |
| PoteatM. PoteatRechsteinerB. RechsteinerSchuttJ. SchuttBurnhamB. BurnhamJohnsonT. Johnson | 45 | 23 | -17.520 | 105.942 | 123.416 | 50.0%40 | 40.0%80 | 22.1%16 | 16.7%12 | 55.9%26 | 75.0%76 | 14.6%32 | 79.4%0 |
| LawalT. LawalPoteatM. PoteatRechsteinerB. RechsteinerYoungJ. YoungJohnsonT. Johnson | 43 | 24 | -5.738 | 111.656 | 117.326 | 44.9%22 | 42.9%88 | 16.3%52 | 48.7%86 | 51.0%48 | 53.6%8 | 17.1%50 | 8.0%96 |
| PoteatM. PoteatRechsteinerB. RechsteinerYoungJ. YoungBurnhamB. BurnhamJohnsonT. Johnson | 40 | 21 | -14.224 | 96.722 | 110.940 | 44.7%22 | 45.8%94 | 24.8%8 | 18.4%18 | 47.6%64 | 65.2%34 | 11.6%14 | 21.4%74 |
| PoteatM. PoteatSchuttJ. SchuttBurnhamB. BurnhamJohnsonT. JohnsonHammondB. Hammond | 40 | 19 | -30.88 | 101.832 | 132.66 | 60.0%84 | 41.2%84 | 32.3%0 | 30.0%50 | 64.5%6 | 65.0%34 | 14.2%30 | 28.9%50 |
| LawalT. LawalSchuttJ. SchuttWesslerP. WesslerJohnsonT. JohnsonHammondB. Hammond | 38 | 21 | -29.610 | 75.64 | 105.154 | 36.1%6 | 50.0%96 | 33.9%0 | 13.9%8 | 50.0%54 | 75.0%76 | 13.7%26 | 26.3%58 |
| SchuttJ. SchuttYoungJ. YoungBurnhamB. BurnhamWesslerP. WesslerHammondB. Hammond | 37 | 16 | -0.646 | 106.042 | 106.650 | 58.6%80 | 17.6%10 | 19.0%32 | 27.6%42 | 48.4%60 | 72.2%66 | 12.5%20 | 12.9%92 |
| LawalT. LawalRechsteinerB. RechsteinerYoungJ. YoungBurnhamB. BurnhamJohnsonT. Johnson | 35 | 17 | 33.392 | 147.2100 | 113.932 | 85.2%100 | 42.9%88 | 22.7%14 | 25.9%38 | 48.6%60 | 60.0%16 | 13.2%24 | 27.8%54 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25 (4,899 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.

