Wake Forest21-14

ACCCoach: Steve Forbes

21-14NET#35

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cameron Hildreth	1,182	214	84.7%	+0.852	−4.728	−5.576	−2.724	+0.254	+2.318	+11.396	−0.454	+9.8100	−0.346	+2.436
Hunter Sallis	1,181	215	84.6%	+8.880	+1.658	−7.282	+2.374	−6.58	−1.570	+0.856	−14.098	−10.62	−6.42	−10.090
Andrew Carr	1,151	244	82.5%	+9.382	−0.548	−9.890	−0.644	−5.212	−2.178	−0.946	−0.656	+10.5100	−0.740	−9.088
Efton Reid III	919	477	65.8%	−5.532	+6.482	+11.96	+2.274	−1.142	−2.684	−1.642	+6.64	+6.094	−4.26	+4.226
Parker Friedrichsen	413	983	29.6%	+5.370	+9.892	+4.526	+4.088	+6.694	−1.772	−9.510	+4.212	−3.024	+3.492	+3.530
Zach Keller	268	1,128	19.2%	+1.354	−7.916	−9.388	−1.534	+1.060	+3.510	+2.566	−5.290	−4.414	+1.776	−13.394
Marqus Marion	249	1,146	17.9%	+0.352	−1.444	−1.758	−1.634	+5.288	+1.724	−1.544	−1.362	−8.44	+5.498	+7.714

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cameron Hildreth	1,182	214	84.7%	14.672	115.968	101.364	56.0%72	27.9%38	15.8%54	32.9%58	48.3%60	73.1%68	17.5%54	29.8%46
Hunter Sallis	1,181	215	84.6%	15.972	116.970	101.064	56.8%74	26.8%34	15.2%58	31.1%54	46.4%68	70.3%56	16.5%46	28.0%52
Andrew Carr	1,151	244	82.5%	16.174	116.570	100.466	56.3%74	27.0%34	15.1%60	30.8%52	48.2%60	73.4%70	17.4%54	27.8%52
Efton Reid III	919	477	65.8%	12.768	118.874	106.150	57.2%76	27.5%36	14.6%64	30.5%52	50.6%48	73.7%72	16.1%44	30.9%44
Parker Friedrichsen	413	983	29.6%	18.276	123.682	105.352	59.2%84	32.5%58	14.3%66	24.5%34	51.3%44	69.4%52	19.9%70	32.0%40
Zach Keller	268	1,128	19.2%	15.572	110.254	94.776	55.2%68	28.7%42	18.3%38	33.0%58	44.2%76	68.1%46	18.9%64	18.9%80
Marqus Marion	249	1,146	17.9%	14.772	115.566	100.764	55.1%68	32.2%56	16.8%46	29.8%50	47.3%64	64.7%32	22.0%80	35.8%30

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cameron Hildreth	1,182	214	84.7%	13.870	120.676	106.848	58.7%82	27.8%38	13.6%70	21.5%26	48.7%58	63.3%28	17.8%56	27.4%54
Hunter Sallis	1,181	215	84.6%	7.158	115.366	108.246	54.5%66	33.3%62	16.7%48	30.3%52	60.4%12	80.9%92	22.9%84	38.0%24
Andrew Carr	1,151	244	82.5%	6.858	117.070	110.340	57.0%76	32.2%56	17.2%44	31.7%56	48.8%56	63.0%26	18.1%58	36.8%28
Efton Reid III	919	477	65.8%	18.176	112.458	94.378	55.0%68	28.6%42	17.2%44	32.1%56	44.0%78	67.8%44	20.3%72	26.7%56
Parker Friedrichsen	413	983	29.6%	12.968	113.762	100.864	55.2%68	25.9%30	16.0%54	34.0%62	47.1%64	72.4%66	16.5%46	28.4%50
Zach Keller	268	1,128	19.2%	14.270	118.272	103.956	56.7%74	27.7%38	14.8%62	30.5%52	49.4%54	72.5%66	17.2%52	32.2%40
Marqus Marion	249	1,146	17.9%	14.472	116.970	102.460	56.7%74	27.0%34	15.2%60	31.3%54	48.5%58	73.0%68	16.6%48	28.1%52

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.