Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Wake Forest logoWake Forest logoWake Forest logoWake Forest logo

Wake Forest18-17

ACCCoach: Steve Forbes

18-17NET#64

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Juke Harris+5.070+15.6100+10.76+3.182−3.024−3.994+6.584+1.038+5.996−5.22−13.596
Tre'Von Spillers+4.468−1.144−5.578+1.062−0.646+0.148−4.130−1.060+5.996−0.444+0.646
Myles Colvin−15.38−8.514+6.814−0.148−2.034+5.12+0.554+3.814−0.248−0.148+6.914
Omaha Biliew+0.754−1.542−2.262−0.446+1.162−0.456−2.438+0.840+2.576+1.068−7.686
Cooper Schwieger−7.224−1.940+5.220−0.842−1.240−0.048−1.144+2.522−6.86−0.738−10.292
Mekhi Mason+2.862+2.666−0.252−0.050−1.042−2.888+2.264−2.978−5.88+0.560+3.330
Nate Calmese+5.572+1.558−4.072+3.988+0.760+0.442−9.310−0.252−4.812+2.790−6.180
Sebastian Akins−2.242−4.428−2.262−2.128−5.112+0.344+8.790−1.666+0.960+0.356+6.018
Isaac Carr−1.146+2.264+3.330−4.116+5.492−2.382+5.278−0.554+3.786−3.86+6.616
Marqus Marion+17.096+3.872−13.296−2.426+6.394−0.456+2.364−6.194+5.894+1.576+2.832
Jaylen Cross+2.560+7.486+4.922+2.980+9.6100+3.76−6.220+7.22+10.2100+1.372+24.30

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Juke Harris3.752112.654109.04653.6%5629.8%5015.1%5635.5%5652.0%4667.5%3817.0%5634.3%44
Tre'Von Spillers4.354110.350106.05453.4%5630.0%5215.6%5033.5%5251.6%4868.3%4217.6%6236.2%38
Myles Colvin-1.942107.842109.74453.1%5429.5%4817.2%3834.7%5453.1%4066.6%3217.7%6238.3%34
Omaha Biliew3.452109.848106.45252.9%5230.7%5215.4%5233.4%5052.3%4467.9%4018.2%6632.2%48
Cooper Schwieger-0.644109.548110.24452.8%5229.6%5015.6%5234.0%5253.1%4063.2%2417.4%6031.0%52
Mekhi Mason4.554111.952107.45053.2%5429.6%5014.2%6235.7%5650.3%5263.8%2618.0%6437.7%34
Nate Calmese6.056111.352105.45455.2%6430.6%5215.8%5029.7%4051.7%4664.1%2619.2%7232.8%46
Sebastian Akins1.748107.842106.15251.8%4827.0%3815.8%5040.2%6650.8%5067.3%3817.9%6239.8%30
Isaac Carr2.250112.354110.14449.9%3634.4%6813.8%6638.7%6451.4%4869.6%4814.7%3841.3%26
Marqus Marion17.274113.75896.57651.2%4435.4%7015.3%5436.5%5846.8%7071.4%5619.0%7038.3%32
Jaylen Cross5.454117.668112.23855.9%6639.3%8419.2%2628.7%3858.7%2076.5%7619.0%7059.3%6

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Juke Harris-1.34297.02098.37250.5%4232.7%6219.0%2629.0%3850.9%5061.6%1822.2%8647.8%16
Tre'Von Spillers-0.146111.352111.54052.5%5030.6%5215.6%5237.5%6052.6%4262.3%2018.0%6435.6%40
Myles Colvin13.468116.364102.96253.3%5431.5%5612.2%7634.3%5249.3%5866.8%3817.8%6231.4%50
Omaha Biliew2.750111.352108.64653.4%5429.7%5015.8%5035.8%5651.4%4865.4%3017.2%5839.8%30
Cooper Schwieger6.556111.552104.95653.5%5630.8%5215.6%5035.1%5450.6%5270.0%4818.1%6441.1%28
Mekhi Mason1.748109.346107.65053.2%5430.7%5217.0%4033.5%5253.3%4069.6%4817.5%6034.4%42
Nate Calmese0.546109.948109.34451.3%4629.8%5015.4%5239.0%6452.0%4669.0%4416.5%5238.9%32
Sebastian Akins3.952112.254108.34853.9%5832.1%6015.5%5231.4%4652.4%4466.3%3217.6%6233.8%44
Isaac Carr3.352110.148106.85254.0%5829.0%4616.1%4833.5%5251.9%4665.9%3218.5%6834.7%42
Marqus Marion0.246109.948109.74453.6%5629.0%4615.7%5034.2%5252.8%4265.7%3217.5%6035.5%40
Jaylen Cross3.050110.248107.25053.0%5429.7%5015.4%5234.9%5451.5%4866.2%3217.7%6235.0%42
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.