Schedule
W
L
W
WL
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
LL
W
LW
LLLLLL
LWWLWLLWLLLWLLLLLLLLLLWLWLLLLLLTeam Stats
31 games- Net Rating-11.414
- Offensive Rating101.78
- Defensive Rating113.041
- Pace68.177
- Effective FG%48.0%18
- Off Rebound Pct29.7%67
- Turnover Pct22.7%19
- FT Attempt Rate36.7%79
Team Stats
31 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating-11.414
- Offensive Rating101.78
- Defensive Rating113.041
- Pace68.177
- Effective FG%48.0%18
- Off Rebound Pct29.7%67
- Turnover Pct22.7%19
- FT Attempt Rate36.7%79
Results & Margin
- Win Pct22.6%8
- Point Margin / Game-7.712
- Points / Game69.330
- Points Allowed / Game77.019
- 1st Half Margin-3.020
- 2nd Half Margin-4.87
- Avg Largest Lead6.915
- Avg Largest Deficit13.722
Box Score
- Points / Game69.330
- Rebounds / Game37.382
- Assists / Game11.519
- ORebs / Game10.872
- DRebs / Game26.580
- Steals / Game4.55
- Blocks / Game2.525
- Turnovers / Game15.56
- PFs / Game17.947
Shooting
- FGMs / Game24.025
- FGAs / Game57.040
- Field Goal Pct42.0%21
- 2PMs / Game17.140
- 2PAs / Game34.643
- 2-Point Pct49.4%41
- 3PMs / Game6.826
- 3PAs / Game22.453
- 3-Point Pct30.5%6
- FTMs / Game14.570
- FTAs / Game20.977
- Free Throw Pct69.3%36
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s49.5%52
- % Pts from 3s29.6%31
- % Pts from FTs20.9%82
- Paint Pts / Game24.977
- % Pts in Paint36.0%85
- Fast Break Pts / Game3.830
- % Pts on Fast Break5.5%32
- Points off TOVs / Game9.022
- % Pts off TOVs13.0%25
- 1st Half Pts / Game32.436
- 2nd Half Pts / Game35.319
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %52.3%20
- Points / Shot1.2128
- 3-Point Att Rate39.3%56
- Assist Pct48.0%20
- Assists / 100 Poss16.99
- Ast/Tov Ratio0.75x7
- PF Drawn / Game18.462
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%52.1%33
- Opp True Shooting %55.3%43
- Opp Field Goal Pct45.1%35
- Opp 2-Point Pct50.1%51
- Opp 3-Point Pct36.9%15
- Opp 3PA Rate38.2%53
- Opp FT Att Rate29.9%74
- Opp Points / Shot1.2552
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game77.019
- Paint Pts Allowed30.43
- Fast Break Pts Allowed9.62
- Pts off TOVs Allowed16.91
- Opp Assist Pct50.3%65
- TOVs Forced / Game10.87
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct72.4%57
- Turnovers Forced Pct15.9%3
- Steal Pct6.5%2
- Block Pct3.6%17
- Hakeem Pct10.1%2
- PF Efficiency0.98x57
- Steals / PF0.25x5
- Blocks / PF0.14x25
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 353 D-I teams- #76FTAR36.7%
- #98SOS2.5
- #110REB Diff+52
- #119PO TOV Diff-260
- #120OREB%29.7%
- #154Opp OREB%27.6%
- #163Paint Pts %39.6%
- #237Adj DRtg107.1
Where they rank bestof 353 D-I teams
- #76FTAR36.7%
- #98SOS2.5
- #110REB Diff+52
- #119PO TOV Diff-260
- #120OREB%29.7%
- #154Opp OREB%27.6%
- #163Paint Pts %39.6%
- #237Adj DRtg107.1
Where they rank worstof 353 D-I teams
- #335Opp TOV%15.4%
- #3333P%30.5%
- #323TOV%22.0%
- #319Pts Diff-240
- #3123PM Diff-57
- #302Opp 3P%36.9%
- #292eFG%48.0%
- #289TS%51.7%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2018-19- 1
North FloridaUNF 2013-1414-16ASUNMost alike in Opp eFG%, TOV%, Opp OREB%85 - 2
Cal St. FullertonCSUF 2015-168-20Big WestMost alike in Opp OREB%, Adj O, eFG%85 - 3
Duquesne 2016-1710-22A10Most alike in 3PA rate, Adj D, Adj O84 - 4
Charleston SouthernCharleston So. 2024-258-22Big SouthMost alike in OREB%, Opp TOV%, eFG%84 - 5
Louisville 2022-234-28ACCMost alike in eFG%, Opp TOV%, Adj O84 - 6
Brown 2014-1511-18IvyMost alike in Adj O, Adj D, Opp OREB%84 - 7
UTSA 2022-238-22C-USAMost alike in 3PA rate, Adj O, eFG%83 - 8
Niagara 2014-158-22MAACMost alike in Adj O, FT rate, OREB%83 - 9Northern IllinoisNIU 2023-249-20MACMost alike in Tempo, FT rate, Adj O82
- 10
Tennessee TechTenn. Tech 2025-2610-18OVCMost alike in Adj O, eFG%, OREB%82
Schedule
Loading the schedule
SethDuganSr
MichaelFlowersSo
KawaniseWilkinsSo
WilliamBoyer-RichardFr
JaredPrintyJr
PatrickEmilienFrJDJoshDavisSrAIAdidaIkongshulJr
TCTJCliffordSo
AdrianMartinFrLTLukeToliverFr
| S. DuganSeth Dugan | Sr | 7'0" | +0.979 | – | – | 58.3%70 | 24.2%86 | 16.6 | 9.9 | 1.7 | 14.3% | 65.1% |
| M. FlowersMichael Flowers | So | 6'1" | -0.144 | – | – | 53.3%45 | 27.6%94 | 15.7 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 32.1% | 78.5% |
| K. WilkinsKawanise Wilkins | So | 6'5" | -0.334 | – | – | 49.8%29 | 20.0%64 | 7.3 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 21.1% | 73.0% |
| W. Boyer-RichardWilliam Boyer-Richard | Fr | 6'1" | -0.431 | – | – | 66.4%90 | 12.3%14 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 47.2% | 80.0% |
| J. PrintyJared Printy | Jr | 6'4" | -0.527 | – | – | 50.6%33 | 12.5%14 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 32.8% | 66.7% |
| P. EmilienPatrick Emilien | Fr | 6'6" | -0.720 | – | – | 48.6%25 | 14.6%26 | 4.8 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 28.2% | 55.1% |
| J. DavisJosh Davis | Sr | 6'5" | -0.815 | – | – | 52.6%42 | 23.3%82 | 10.9 | 5.5 | 1.6 | 29.8% | 65.9% |
| A. IkongshulAdida Ikongshul | Jr | 6'6" | – | – | – | 54.1%50 | 16.2%36 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 25.0% | 64.3% |
| TJ Clifford | So | 6'5" | – | – | – | 56.9%64 | 21.1%72 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 25.0% | 50.0% |
| A. MartinAdrian Martin | Fr | 6'3" | – | – | – | 27.8%5 | 15.2%29 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 17.5% | 77.8% |
| DJ Houston | Fr | 5'11" | – | – | – | 40.7%11 | 14.7%27 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 25.0% | 42.9% |
| L. ToliverLuke Toliver | Fr | 6'3" | – | – | – | 76.0%96 | 19.3%59 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 14.3% | 100.0% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 10-21 | #274 | -9.920 | 106.534 | 116.414 | -2.055 | +5762 | -5911 | 31.2%52 | +7210 | 50.2%28 | 35.2%72 | 74.2%68 |
| 24-25 | 12-20 | #285 | -10.019 | 103.327 | 113.318 | -3.842 | +9272 | -796 | 34.2%84 | -2661 | 47.4%9 | 28.7%1 | 67.2%11 |
| 23-24 | 12-20 | #297 | -8.521 | 102.529 | 111.024 | -3.836 | +8473 | +248 | 33.8%86 | +769 | 49.9%34 | 33.9%49 | 62.5%1 |
| 22-23 | 8-23 | #322 | -12.810 | 103.237 | 116.01 | -4.224 | +14691 | -738 | 34.3%93 | +904 | 50.1%38 | 33.0%33 | 71.4%47 |
| 21-22 | 8-23 | #340 | -17.65 | 99.123 | 116.71 | -3.044 | -9215 | +1861 | 26.9%34 | +1073 | 49.6%38 | 33.2%39 | 70.0%34 |
| 19-20 | 13-19 | #238 | -5.632 | 100.638 | 106.225 | -0.661 | -4927 | -1041 | 25.0%20 | +4618 | 49.2%40 | 33.7%55 | 71.5%56 |
| 18-19 | 8-24 | #256 | -7.027 | 100.624 | 107.732 | 1.571 | +6868 | -5015 | 29.9%64 | +1371 | 48.7%20 | 31.5%12 | 69.1%34 |
| 17-18 | 17-15 | #185 | -1.447 | 107.660 | 109.033 | -2.639 | +3354 | -5712 | 30.6%64 | -9893 | 49.9%33 | 34.4%41 | 72.7%65 |
| 16-17 | 16-16 | #171 | -1.147 | 105.658 | 106.638 | -0.461 | +9374 | -3922 | 32.0%78 | -2060 | 50.5%46 | 37.2%79 | 70.2%52 |
| 15-16 | 11-19 | #182 | -1.349 | 104.351 | 105.545 | 0.059 | +9677 | -678 | 30.8%59 | +1241 | 48.5%30 | 34.6%50 | 71.2%65 |
| 14-15 | 18-14 | #152 | 0.554 | 107.075 | 106.527 | -0.457 | +1952 | -2828 | 30.6%43 | -2160 | 52.0%81 | 36.4%77 | 70.3%63 |
| 13-1414 | 22-10 | #134 | 2.862 | 106.354 | 103.563 | -1.448 | +6064 | -3030 | 31.6%47 | +4719 | 52.0%77 | 32.9%30 | 72.4%77 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
51.7%#287
Effective FG %
48.0%#290
3-Point %
30.5%#331
3PAR
39.3%#154
FTAR
36.7%#73
Assist %
48.0%#283
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
36.4%#147
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
24.8%#148
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
27 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9620D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.712144.9% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.214530.0% of shots
Late 21s+1.113625.2% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0723Allowed, D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.921651.0% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.254928.2% of shots
Late 21s+1.185020.8% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 352 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.