Yale21-10

IvyCoach: James Jones

21-10NET#79

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Bez Mbeng	1,585	335	82.6%	+18.096	+5.376	−12.794	+2.576	−1.636	−3.186	−0.846	−6.294	+0.052	+2.786	+3.728
John Poulakidas	1,501	418	78.2%	+25.3100	+16.4100	−8.988	+6.196	+5.590	−2.076	+7.386	−5.692	+1.566	−0.150	+3.132
Danny Wolf	1,463	457	76.2%	−2.740	−5.722	−3.066	+2.476	−8.94	+0.638	−6.718	−1.262	+1.768	+0.458	−5.678
August Mahoney	1,346	574	70.1%	+6.874	+11.496	+4.726	+7.598	−2.926	−1.570	−12.84	+2.228	+0.454	−0.346	−5.578
Matt Knowling	1,186	733	61.8%	+19.498	+9.390	−10.290	+5.494	−0.052	−1.164	+4.376	−4.086	+1.062	+2.786	+3.828
Nick Townsend	829	1,090	43.2%	−6.628	+0.050	+6.718	−2.130	+4.486	+0.638	+1.158	+3.020	+2.172	−2.912	−4.874
Yassine Gharram	649	1,270	33.8%	−17.28	−10.210	+7.016	−4.214	+0.354	+4.06	+6.484	+4.412	+3.178	−1.626	+1.540
Casey Simmons	588	1,332	30.6%	−17.08	−14.36	+2.734	−7.94	+1.464	+2.220	+1.660	+0.840	−3.520	−0.642	−1.156
Samson Aletan	192	1,728	10.0%	−4.932	−1.244	+3.730	−2.030	+4.586	+1.922	−3.532	+1.830	−3.520	+0.660	+7.514
Jack Molloy	118	1,802	6.1%	−29.92	−17.64	+12.34	−10.12	−0.548	+0.836	−3.732	−0.656	−11.12	−4.06	+10.66

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Bez Mbeng	1,585	335	82.6%	9.464	112.558	103.058	53.1%60	29.3%44	13.9%68	27.9%44	49.5%54	73.9%72	16.7%48	30.0%46
John Poulakidas	1,501	418	78.2%	11.866	115.166	103.358	53.9%64	30.9%52	14.1%68	29.6%50	49.4%54	74.2%74	16.2%44	30.0%46
Danny Wolf	1,463	457	76.2%	5.656	110.252	104.554	53.2%60	27.2%36	14.6%64	26.4%40	50.3%48	74.3%74	16.3%46	28.0%52
August Mahoney	1,346	574	70.1%	8.360	115.064	106.750	54.8%68	28.6%42	14.0%68	24.2%34	51.3%46	74.0%72	16.1%44	27.7%54
Matt Knowling	1,186	733	61.8%	13.670	115.166	101.462	54.7%66	29.6%46	14.1%68	29.7%50	49.1%56	74.3%74	17.2%52	30.8%44
Nick Townsend	829	1,090	43.2%	2.550	111.656	109.144	51.5%52	32.0%56	14.8%62	28.6%46	52.3%40	75.1%78	14.5%32	26.6%56
Yassine Gharram	649	1,270	33.8%	-5.038	104.840	109.842	49.8%42	29.8%46	17.1%46	32.3%58	53.5%34	76.0%80	15.2%38	30.3%44
Casey Simmons	588	1,332	30.6%	-5.538	101.632	107.148	47.1%32	30.5%50	16.0%52	29.1%48	51.2%46	71.5%62	15.8%42	28.5%50
Samson Aletan	192	1,728	10.0%	1.950	110.554	108.644	50.8%48	33.6%62	16.2%52	24.9%36	52.2%40	70.8%58	16.7%48	36.1%30
Jack Molloy	118	1,802	6.1%	-21.816	95.120	116.926	43.2%18	29.1%44	15.3%58	24.5%34	50.0%54	63.6%28	12.4%20	39.3%22

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Bez Mbeng	1,585	335	82.6%	-8.632	107.246	115.828	50.5%48	30.9%52	17.0%46	28.7%46	55.7%26	73.8%72	14.0%30	26.3%58
John Poulakidas	1,501	418	78.2%	-13.526	98.726	112.236	47.8%34	25.3%28	16.0%52	22.3%28	55.0%28	72.6%66	16.3%46	26.9%56
Danny Wolf	1,463	457	76.2%	8.360	115.968	107.646	50.8%48	36.2%72	14.0%68	33.0%58	51.6%44	72.5%66	15.9%42	33.6%34
August Mahoney	1,346	574	70.1%	1.548	103.538	102.062	47.3%32	31.5%54	15.5%56	37.0%68	49.1%56	73.6%72	16.4%46	33.2%36
Matt Knowling	1,186	733	61.8%	-5.836	105.842	111.636	49.3%42	29.6%46	15.1%60	25.4%36	53.1%36	73.2%70	14.5%32	27.0%56
Nick Townsend	829	1,090	43.2%	9.162	111.556	102.460	53.5%62	27.6%36	14.2%66	27.5%44	49.3%54	73.0%68	17.4%54	31.4%42
Yassine Gharram	649	1,270	33.8%	12.268	115.064	102.860	54.0%64	29.5%46	13.1%74	25.9%38	49.1%56	72.9%68	16.8%48	28.8%50
Casey Simmons	588	1,332	30.6%	11.566	115.968	104.456	55.0%68	29.1%44	13.8%70	27.5%42	50.4%48	74.9%74	16.4%46	29.7%46
Samson Aletan	192	1,728	10.0%	6.858	111.758	104.954	52.8%58	29.1%44	14.3%66	28.4%46	50.4%48	74.2%74	16.1%44	28.6%50
Jack Molloy	118	1,802	6.1%	8.160	112.660	104.556	53.3%60	29.6%46	14.4%64	28.2%46	50.6%48	74.7%74	16.4%46	28.6%50

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.