Schedule
WL
L
L
WL
L
W
WWW
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
WW
WWWWWLW
LLWLLWWWWWLWLWWLWLWLWWWWWWWLWTeam Stats
27 games- Net Rating7.075
- Offensive Rating127.494
- Defensive Rating120.416
- Pace57.18
- Effective FG%49.6%51
- Off Rebound Pct28.6%58
- Turnover Pct25.7%7
- FT Attempt Rate41.1%97
Team Stats
27 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating7.075
- Offensive Rating127.494
- Defensive Rating120.416
- Pace57.18
- Effective FG%49.6%51
- Off Rebound Pct28.6%58
- Turnover Pct25.7%7
- FT Attempt Rate41.1%97
Results & Margin
- Win Pct59.3%67
- Point Margin / Game4.073
- Points / Game72.872
- Points Allowed / Game68.857
- 1st Half Margin4.589
- 2nd Half Margin-0.544
- Avg Largest Lead12.168
- Avg Largest Deficit7.088
Box Score
- Points / Game72.872
- Rebounds / Game31.78
- Assists / Game13.671
- ORebs / Game10.054
- DRebs / Game21.83
- Steals / Game9.098
- Blocks / Game2.736
- Turnovers / Game14.713
- PFs / Game22.01
Shooting
- FGMs / Game24.642
- FGAs / Game56.135
- Field Goal Pct43.9%58
- 2PMs / Game18.159
- 2PAs / Game35.548
- 2-Point Pct51.0%70
- 3PMs / Game6.530
- 3PAs / Game20.638
- 3-Point Pct31.5%25
- FTMs / Game17.197
- FTAs / Game23.094
- Free Throw Pct74.3%79
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s49.8%43
- % Pts from 3s26.7%22
- % Pts from FTs23.5%98
- Paint Pts / Game22.773
- % Pts in Paint31.1%64
- Fast Break Pts / Game6.766
- % Pts on Fast Break9.2%62
- Points off TOVs / Game16.598
- % Pts off TOVs22.6%97
- 1st Half Pts / Game36.192
- 2nd Half Pts / Game35.529
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %55.0%70
- Points / Shot1.3087
- 3-Point Att Rate36.7%42
- Assist Pct55.3%79
- Assists / 100 Poss23.891
- Ast/Tov Ratio0.93x40
- PF Drawn / Game20.194
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%50.4%36
- Opp True Shooting %56.2%15
- Opp Field Goal Pct45.3%22
- Opp 2-Point Pct52.3%19
- Opp 3-Point Pct30.9%84
- Opp 3PA Rate32.6%88
- Opp FT Att Rate48.9%1
- Opp Points / Shot1.374
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game68.857
- Paint Pts Allowed22.927
- Fast Break Pts Allowed8.611
- Pts off TOVs Allowed12.247
- Opp Assist Pct45.5%87
- TOVs Forced / Game18.7100
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct70.7%32
- Turnovers Forced Pct32.7%98
- Steal Pct15.8%99
- Block Pct4.7%51
- Hakeem Pct20.4%98
- PF Efficiency1.09x21
- Steals / PF0.41x79
- Blocks / PF0.12x13
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 353 D-I teams- #2Opp TOV%26.4%
- #13FTAR41.1%
- #56Opp 3P%30.9%
- #73AST%55.3%
- #853PM Diff+38
- #102Pts Diff+108
- #113TS%54.3%
- #127Adj DRtg100.0
Where they rank bestof 353 D-I teams
- #2Opp TOV%26.4%
- #13FTAR41.1%
- #56Opp 3P%30.9%
- #73AST%55.3%
- #853PM Diff+38
- #102Pts Diff+108
- #113TS%54.3%
- #127Adj DRtg100.0
Where they rank worstof 353 D-I teams
- #327SOS-6.4
- #278TOV%20.7%
- #2673P%31.5%
- #242REB Diff-57
- #240Opp OREB%29.3%
- #231Adj ORtg99.3
- #226Opp eFG%50.4%
- #172eFG%49.6%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2019-20- 1
UC Davis 2023-2418-13Big WestMost alike in Adj O, eFG%, Opp OREB%90 - 2
Manhattan 2017-1814-17MAACMost alike in 3PA rate, Adj O, Adj D80 - 3
Norfolk St. 2018-1919-14MEACMost alike in TOV%, 3PA rate, Adj O79 - 4Norfolk St. 2023-2420-11MEACMost alike in TOV%, FT rate, Adj O78
- 5
TCU 2015-1612-21Big 12Most alike in Opp eFG%, Adj O, Opp OREB%78 - 6Lamar 2017-1815-14SouthlandMost alike in 3PA rate, Opp eFG%, Tempo78
- 7Texas A&M Corpus ChrisTAMUCC 2015-1623-8SouthlandMost alike in Adj D, OREB%, Tempo77
- 8
Seattle 2024-2512-18WACMost alike in Adj O, OREB%, Opp eFG%77 - 9Manhattan 2014-1519-14MAACMost alike in Adj D, Adj O, eFG%76
- 10
Tennessee St.Tenn. St. 2015-1618-11OVCMost alike in Adj O, eFG%, TOV%76
Schedule
Loading the schedule
PaytenRicksSrCGClayGaymanSo
DamienDanielsSo
CoryonMasonJr
KoltonKohlJr
ReggieMillerJr
JoePleasantSoHHHaydenHowellSr
TLTreyLenoxSr
PHPaulHieplerJr
TobiasCameronSo
MahkiMorrisJr
AirionSimmonsFr| P. RicksPayten Ricks | Sr | 6'2" | +0.465 | – | – | 55.1%58 | 21.0%71 | 14.3 | 3.1 | 1.9 | 35.6% | 84.6% |
| C. GaymanClay Gayman | So | 6'6" | +0.259 | – | – | 66.0%90 | 25.4%89 | 9.5 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 38.6% | 77.9% |
| D. DanielsDamien Daniels | So | 5'7" | +0.258 | – | – | 48.7%28 | 18.0%50 | 5.2 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 27.6% | 74.4% |
| C. MasonCoryon Mason | Jr | 6'0" | -0.242 | – | – | 60.7%81 | 17.4%46 | 8.8 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 34.7% | 75.9% |
| K. KohlKolton Kohl | Jr | 7'0" | -0.240 | – | – | 59.5%77 | 24.8%88 | 9.6 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 0.0% | 72.6% |
| R. MillerReggie Miller | Jr | 6'0" | -0.719 | – | – | 40.0%11 | 14.7%27 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 17.6% | 62.9% |
| J. PleasantJoe Pleasant | So | 6'8" | -0.719 | – | – | 54.2%54 | 22.7%80 | 11.0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 36.1% | 70.3% |
| H. HowellHayden Howell | Sr | 6'7" | – | – | – | 58.6%74 | 20.9%70 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 20.0% | 73.7% |
| T. LenoxTrey Lenox | Sr | 6'3" | – | – | – | 40.9%11 | 10.7%9 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 22.9% | 44.4% |
| P. HieplerPaul Hiepler | Jr | 6'4" | – | – | – | 134.4%100 | 22.7%80 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 25.0% | 0.0% |
| T. CameronTobias Cameron | So | 6'5" | – | – | – | 72.4%94 | 20.8%70 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 18.2% | 90.9% |
| M. MorrisMahki Morris | Jr | 6'3" | – | – | – | 66.0%90 | 19.0%57 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 29.4% | 85.7% |
| A. SimmonsAirion Simmons | Fr | 6'5" | – | – | – | 62.6%85 | 20.4%68 | 5.4 | 4.1 | 0.7 | 37.5% | 60.0% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 14-19 | #264 | -7.926 | 101.412 | 109.355 | -2.848 | +2149 | -740 | 32.6%66 | -7083 | 48.9%15 | 31.4%13 | 70.4%29 |
| 24-25 | 16-16 | #248 | -6.830 | 98.78 | 105.568 | -4.534 | +944 | -3520 | 31.8%64 | -7186 | 48.3%13 | 30.2%5 | 71.5%42 |
| 23-24 | 16-18 | #238 | -5.334 | 101.724 | 107.049 | -2.052 | -11214 | -1934 | 26.6%25 | -6181 | 47.9%18 | 34.0%50 | 72.7%61 |
| 22-23 | 13-17 | #209 | -2.644 | 105.251 | 107.836 | -1.058 | -3631 | +2366 | 28.6%45 | -15199 | 51.0%49 | 34.4%54 | 72.3%58 |
| 21-22 | 25-11 | #121 | 3.464 | 104.551 | 101.268 | -4.629 | -8620 | +550 | 29.3%57 | -302100 | 49.6%37 | 32.0%26 | 75.4%85 |
| 19-20 | 20-11 | #183 | -0.549 | 100.235 | 100.863 | -8.53 | +649 | +5584 | 30.6%71 | -180100 | 50.7%60 | 30.9%16 | 74.1%77 |
| 18-1915 | 27-7 | #152 | 1.857 | 104.648 | 102.864 | -8.93 | +2955 | +6086 | 29.6%61 | -15299 | 53.5%80 | 38.0%92 | 71.2%55 |
| 17-18 | 16-16 | #248 | -6.630 | 99.716 | 106.349 | -7.07 | -1438 | -151 | 28.0%41 | -5281 | 52.1%63 | 32.5%14 | 70.1%34 |
| 16-17 | 13-16 | #291 | -11.315 | 96.913 | 108.230 | -7.67 | -11314 | -345 | 23.5%8 | -1557 | 53.0%79 | 37.6%82 | 66.3%16 |
| 15-16 | 9-18 | #313 | -14.68 | 97.614 | 112.29 | -7.96 | -4033 | +4181 | 26.0%16 | -3067 | 51.4%66 | 36.7%80 | 70.1%55 |
| 14-15 | 7-21 | #340 | -18.93 | 92.97 | 111.86 | -6.57 | -2171 | +4986 | 25.4%7 | -5382 | 48.2%37 | 38.0%88 | 72.7%85 |
| 13-14 | 2-19 | #347 | -18.83 | 97.411 | 116.23 | -8.34 | +1951 | +5890 | 30.9%43 | +1836 | 51.0%66 | 39.8%98 | 74.5%93 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
54.3%#110
Effective FG %
49.6%#172
3-Point %
31.5%#264
3PAR
36.7%#202
FTAR
41.1%#12
Assist %
55.3%#73
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
42.4%#30
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
20.4%#47
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
9 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9843D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.975932.8% of shots
Middle 11–20s0.941543.7% of shots
Late 21s+1.077223.5% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0327Allowed, D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s1.022735.0% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.055436.5% of shots
Late 21s+1.014528.5% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 351 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 19-20. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 19-20. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.