Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Pac 12
Arizona logo

Arizona

27-9NET#4Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #6Coach: Tommy Lloyd
Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Caleb Love−12.5−12.4+0.1−4.5−5.1+0.6−10.8−2.6+0.4−2.6−2.7
Pelle Larsson+2.0+5.3+3.3+3.5−1.3−0.5+4.1+2.4−0.6−0.4−11.3
Keshad Johnson−9.5−2.9+6.6−0.6−2.7+0.2+1.8−0.7−2.5−5.2−10.7
Kylan Boswell−14.7−2.3+12.4+1.2+0.0+1.7−8.1+4.6+1.0−6.3−7.8
Oumar Ballo−2.7−1.7+1.0+1.4+0.2+0.9+2.9−1.1−3.1−1.9−11.3
Jaden Bradley+13.6+4.0−9.7+1.9−5.3−2.6+6.2−2.9−0.3+5.9+8.5
KJ Lewis+2.0+1.7−0.3−0.4−1.3−1.5+5.6+2.8+1.2+3.9+11.3
Motiejus Krivas+7.2−1.3−8.5+0.4−1.1+1.3−7.6−2.2+3.8+1.9+2.0
Filip Borovicanin+20.4+6.6−13.8−1.9+15.8+1.9+2.2−4.4+4.3+2.8+15.3
Paulius Murauskas+1.8+5.4+3.6−3.7+15.7+2.4−5.3+1.1+1.6−0.6+24.4

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Caleb Love17.3115.898.553.7%36.1%16.3%33.9%48.1%74.7%17.3%24.6%
Pelle Larsson20.1119.499.355.3%36.7%16.1%36.8%49.1%74.5%17.7%22.5%
Keshad Johnson16.7117.2100.554.3%36.2%16.2%36.4%48.4%73.9%16.2%22.1%
Kylan Boswell14.9117.4102.554.9%37.0%16.7%33.3%49.9%74.9%15.8%22.7%
Oumar Ballo18.7117.598.855.0%37.1%16.5%36.9%48.2%73.5%17.2%21.3%
Jaden Bradley26.7120.293.555.5%34.2%14.8%39.2%47.0%74.5%20.9%29.7%
KJ Lewis20.7119.098.354.2%36.3%15.4%39.0%50.2%75.3%20.0%31.8%
Motiejus Krivas24.8117.192.454.8%36.2%17.1%30.4%46.9%77.3%19.2%26.6%
Filip Borovicanin38.7124.385.652.8%51.8%17.9%37.9%44.4%78.7%20.5%39.5%
Paulius Murauskas21.3123.1101.951.0%51.6%18.4%30.9%49.6%76.1%17.3%48.0%

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Caleb Love29.8128.298.458.2%41.3%15.7%44.7%50.6%74.3%19.9%27.3%
Pelle Larsson18.1114.196.051.9%38.0%16.6%32.8%46.7%75.1%18.1%33.7%
Keshad Johnson26.2120.293.954.9%38.9%16.1%34.6%49.0%76.4%21.4%32.8%
Kylan Boswell29.6119.790.153.7%37.0%15.0%41.4%45.3%74.0%22.1%30.6%
Oumar Ballo21.4119.297.853.6%36.9%15.6%33.9%49.3%76.7%19.0%32.7%
Jaden Bradley13.1116.2103.153.6%39.5%17.4%32.9%49.8%74.8%15.0%21.2%
KJ Lewis18.8117.498.654.7%37.6%16.8%33.4%47.4%74.1%16.1%20.4%
Motiejus Krivas17.6118.5100.954.4%37.3%15.8%38.0%49.1%73.5%17.3%24.5%
Filip Borovicanin18.3117.799.454.6%36.0%16.1%35.7%48.8%74.3%17.6%24.2%
Paulius Murauskas19.5117.898.354.7%35.9%16.1%36.2%48.5%74.5%17.8%23.7%
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.