Baylor23-11

Big 12Coach: Scott Drew

23-11NET#15

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

RayJ Dennis	1,875	349	84.3%	−11.616	−10.710	+0.944	−3.120	−4.118	+1.626	−4.030	−1.160	+1.162	−0.248	−1.054
Ja'Kobe Walter	1,787	438	80.3%	−6.230	−8.216	−2.060	−6.86	−0.448	−0.454	−5.622	+0.840	+2.876	+1.168	+0.844
Jalen Bridges	1,734	490	78.0%	−4.932	−2.936	+2.038	−7.74	−4.714	−5.596	−0.848	−4.888	−2.628	−3.112	+6.916
Jayden Nunn	1,558	667	70.0%	−5.830	−3.832	+2.038	−1.436	−3.820	−1.470	+3.170	−0.252	−5.410	+1.676	−3.770
Yves Missi	1,225	999	55.1%	−8.822	−4.328	+4.526	−3.120	+1.362	+0.048	+9.692	+1.830	+0.152	−1.924	−3.670
Langston Love	919	1,305	41.3%	−1.246	+2.564	+3.730	−0.248	+1.162	−1.368	+4.678	+0.346	−6.08	+0.560	+4.226
Josh Ojianwuna	829	1,395	37.3%	+3.966	+0.452	−3.566	+0.960	−2.034	−0.150	−4.924	−1.160	−1.538	+2.786	+1.838
Caleb Lohner	509	1,715	22.9%	−1.146	−1.244	−0.150	+4.088	+5.088	+5.82	−4.030	+5.18	+5.592	+1.472	−5.678
Miro Little	353	1,871	15.9%	+11.888	+7.886	−3.970	+8.8100	+1.868	+3.210	−0.846	+0.050	+5.090	−2.022	−2.664
Jonathan Tchamwa Tchatchoua	159	2,065	7.1%	+26.4100	+19.3100	−7.082	+9.5100	+5.088	−0.454	−13.34	−2.978	+5.090	−3.112	−1.758
Dantwan Grimes	149	2,076	6.7%	+32.9100	+25.1100	−7.884	+12.4100	+10.3100	+0.244	+3.068	+0.444	+10.0100	−0.544	−0.150

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

RayJ Dennis	1,875	349	84.3%	10.866	117.570	106.750	55.5%70	36.4%72	18.2%38	39.8%74	51.1%46	70.8%58	17.1%52	31.1%42
Ja'Kobe Walter	1,787	438	80.3%	11.466	117.570	106.150	54.7%66	36.9%74	17.9%40	39.4%72	51.4%44	71.2%60	17.4%54	31.4%42
Jalen Bridges	1,734	490	78.0%	11.566	118.572	107.048	54.4%66	36.2%72	16.7%48	40.3%74	50.2%48	70.1%56	16.5%46	32.7%38
Jayden Nunn	1,558	667	70.0%	10.966	118.072	107.148	55.6%70	35.9%72	17.5%42	41.4%76	51.2%46	69.0%50	17.6%54	30.2%46
Yves Missi	1,225	999	55.1%	8.762	117.270	108.644	54.6%66	37.6%78	18.0%40	44.8%82	52.0%42	70.7%58	16.3%46	29.7%46
Langston Love	919	1,305	41.3%	11.966	120.676	108.744	55.8%72	37.7%78	17.2%44	43.1%80	51.4%44	67.1%42	17.5%54	33.7%34
Josh Ojianwuna	829	1,395	37.3%	15.072	119.474	104.456	56.6%74	35.8%70	17.9%40	37.3%68	50.6%48	69.7%54	18.8%64	32.4%38
Caleb Lohner	509	1,715	22.9%	11.866	118.272	106.550	59.1%82	41.0%86	22.4%16	37.3%68	55.2%28	75.0%74	18.2%60	26.9%56
Miro Little	353	1,871	15.9%	22.582	125.784	103.258	63.4%92	38.6%80	20.7%22	39.7%74	51.3%46	74.7%74	15.5%40	29.1%48
Jonathan Tchamwa Tchatchoua	159	2,065	7.1%	37.194	137.196	100.066	64.8%94	41.7%86	17.6%42	28.2%46	48.5%58	75.3%78	14.3%32	29.6%46
Dantwan Grimes	149	2,076	6.7%	43.396	142.698	99.368	67.6%96	46.8%96	18.2%38	43.2%80	51.6%44	80.0%88	16.7%48	31.1%42

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

RayJ Dennis	1,875	349	84.3%	22.482	128.288	105.852	58.6%82	40.5%84	16.6%48	43.8%80	52.2%40	69.7%54	17.3%52	32.1%40
Ja'Kobe Walter	1,787	438	80.3%	17.676	125.784	108.146	61.5%88	37.4%76	18.3%38	45.0%82	50.6%48	68.4%48	16.3%46	30.6%44
Jalen Bridges	1,734	490	78.0%	16.474	121.478	105.054	62.1%90	40.9%86	22.2%16	41.0%76	55.1%28	72.7%66	19.6%68	25.8%58
Jayden Nunn	1,558	667	70.0%	16.774	121.878	105.154	57.0%76	39.7%82	18.9%34	38.2%70	51.4%44	74.4%74	16.0%44	33.9%34
Yves Missi	1,225	999	55.1%	17.576	121.578	104.056	57.7%78	36.3%72	17.9%40	35.2%64	50.2%48	70.6%56	18.2%58	33.3%36
Langston Love	919	1,305	41.3%	13.170	118.172	105.054	56.1%72	36.6%72	18.5%36	38.5%70	51.1%46	73.1%68	16.9%50	29.5%46
Josh Ojianwuna	829	1,395	37.3%	11.266	119.074	107.846	55.6%70	37.8%78	18.0%40	42.3%78	51.6%44	71.2%60	16.2%44	30.6%44
Caleb Lohner	509	1,715	22.9%	12.968	119.474	106.650	55.1%68	36.0%72	16.6%48	41.3%76	50.1%50	69.5%52	16.8%50	32.5%38
Miro Little	353	1,871	15.9%	10.764	117.972	107.248	54.6%66	36.8%74	17.4%42	40.6%74	51.2%46	69.8%54	17.5%54	31.7%40
Jonathan Tchamwa Tchatchoua	159	2,065	7.1%	10.764	117.872	107.048	55.3%68	36.7%74	18.0%40	41.4%76	51.5%44	70.2%56	17.4%52	31.4%42
Dantwan Grimes	149	2,076	6.7%	10.464	117.570	107.148	55.2%68	36.4%72	17.9%40	40.2%74	51.2%46	70.0%54	17.2%52	31.3%42

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.