Belmont21-11

MVCCoach: Casey Alexander

21-11NET#131

Poss2,187

Net Rtg2.752

ORtg113.360

DRtg110.640

Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,187	1,037	2.752	113.360	110.640	55.1%66	28.5%40	15.7%56	25.8%36	53.8%34	68.9%50	17.9%56	26.9%56
RogersB. RogersPierreJ. PierreWalkerI. WalkerLundbladeT. LundbladeWhittC. Whitt	482	254	9.864	109.650	99.868	55.6%70	27.5%36	18.1%38	21.6%26	48.5%60	70.1%56	19.7%68	28.4%52
PierreJ. PierreWalkerI. WalkerOrmeS. OrmeLundbladeT. LundbladeWhittC. Whitt	171	70	-8.134	121.176	129.18	51.0%48	29.7%46	8.8%92	39.6%74	58.5%18	62.0%22	15.2%36	47.5%14
PierreJ. PierreWalkerI. WalkerScharnowskiD. ScharnowskiLundbladeT. LundbladeWhittC. Whitt	85	40	11.666	135.894	124.114	65.2%94	38.1%76	14.0%68	27.8%44	60.1%12	60.0%16	21.9%80	17.6%84
PierreJ. PierreNoyesA. NoyesWalkerI. WalkerLundbladeT. LundbladeWhittC. Whitt	72	30	-16.922	114.762	131.56	62.7%90	17.2%10	20.7%22	47.1%84	61.9%10	67.6%44	11.6%14	19.4%80
RogersB. RogersPierreJ. PierreWalkerI. WalkerOrmeS. OrmeWhittC. Whitt	71	35	10.766	107.244	96.574	46.0%26	29.8%46	14.1%68	39.7%74	46.5%68	66.7%38	19.6%68	16.9%86
PierreJ. PierrePeeblesB. PeeblesWalkerI. WalkerLundbladeT. LundbladeWhittC. Whitt	65	27	-13.426	116.768	130.08	58.2%80	23.3%22	15.4%60	27.3%42	69.3%2	74.1%74	18.8%62	50.0%12
RogersB. RogersWalkerI. WalkerOrmeS. OrmeLundbladeT. LundbladeWhittC. Whitt	51	26	24.884	128.288	103.458	51.1%48	32.1%56	7.8%94	42.6%78	50.0%54	69.0%50	19.5%66	19.6%78
RogersB. RogersNoyesA. NoyesWalkerI. WalkerLundbladeT. LundbladeWhittC. Whitt	50	25	-32.38	104.438	136.84	58.1%78	24.0%24	18.1%38	18.6%18	65.2%4	45.0%2	18.1%58	26.1%60
RogersB. RogersPeeblesB. PeeblesWalkerI. WalkerOrmeS. OrmeWhittC. Whitt	48	26	-23.414	85.710	109.144	47.4%30	42.3%88	35.5%0	15.4%10	58.9%16	82.6%94	15.9%40	6.7%98
RogersB. RogersPierreJ. PierrePeeblesB. PeeblesWalkerI. WalkerLundbladeT. Lundblade	42	20	14.270	119.374	105.154	70.6%98	28.6%42	23.9%10	11.8%6	51.4%46	70.0%54	19.1%64	16.2%86
PierreJ. PierreNoyesA. NoyesWalkerI. WalkerOrmeS. OrmeWhittC. Whitt	39	21	-3.442	106.442	109.742	31.3%2	35.3%68	5.2%98	45.0%82	50.0%54	80.0%90	5.1%2	36.1%32
RogersB. RogersPierreJ. PierreNoyesA. NoyesWalkerI. WalkerWhittC. Whitt	32	18	-3.042	142.198	145.00	59.7%84	45.0%92	9.3%92	13.9%8	70.0%2	61.9%22	13.4%24	31.4%44
WalkerI. WalkerOrmeS. OrmeScharnowskiD. ScharnowskiLundbladeT. LundbladeWhittC. Whitt	31	15	22.682	127.788	105.154	59.7%84	22.2%20	3.2%98	22.6%28	50.0%54	76.5%82	17.0%50	39.3%24
RogersB. RogersPierreJ. PierreNoyesA. NoyesPeeblesB. PeeblesWalkerI. Walker	31	14	-26.512	103.736	130.28	48.1%34	29.4%44	19.4%30	22.2%26	67.3%2	76.9%84	14.1%28	11.5%94
RogersB. RogersPierreJ. PierrePeeblesB. PeeblesWalkerI. WalkerWhittC. Whitt	30	17	-4.938	95.520	100.466	52.0%52	17.6%10	19.8%28	20.0%20	48.5%60	70.0%54	16.7%46	18.2%82

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25 (4,899 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.