ON/OFF Difference
How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.
| Possessions | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isaiah Walker | 1,815 | 372 | 83.0% | +9.7— | +1.6— | −8.1— | −5.2— | +0.5— | −4.0— | +11.4— | −1.6— | +6.0— | +0.7— | −0.2— |
| Carter Whitt | 1,744 | 444 | 79.7% | −10.6— | +0.5— | +11.1— | −2.1— | +0.9— | −1.2— | +0.4— | +1.2— | −5.4— | −2.8— | +9.0— |
| Jonathan Pierre | 1,583 | 604 | 72.4% | +3.4— | +3.4— | +0.0— | +1.4— | +2.6— | +1.4— | +1.5— | −0.2— | +1.1— | −1.0— | −2.7— |
| Tyler Lundblade | 1,567 | 620 | 71.7% | −5.9— | +1.2— | +7.1— | +4.3— | −7.1— | −0.6— | −1.8— | +1.9— | +0.2— | −1.5— | +9.3— |
| Brigham Rogers | 1,190 | 997 | 54.4% | +6.7— | −5.5— | −12.2— | +0.4— | +0.4— | +3.3— | −8.5— | −4.0— | +0.3— | +2.9— | −4.6— |
| Sam Orme | 857 | 1,330 | 39.2% | +3.3— | +1.6— | −1.8— | −5.5— | +4.5— | −3.2— | +9.5— | −1.8— | +0.9— | −0.5— | +1.6— |
| Brody Peebles | 833 | 1,354 | 38.1% | +3.6— | −0.3— | −3.9— | +1.9— | −1.6— | +0.4— | −6.1— | +1.0— | +5.5— | +0.7— | −2.9— |
| Aidan Noyes | 695 | 1,493 | 31.8% | +0.4— | +1.6— | +1.2— | +0.9— | −1.5— | −1.5— | −0.6— | −0.2— | −3.6— | −1.4— | −6.1— |
| Drew Scharnowski | 447 | 1,740 | 20.4% | −3.5— | +3.9— | +7.3— | +3.4— | +2.6— | +0.5— | −2.9— | +3.5— | −4.3— | +1.2— | −6.1— |
| Win Miller | 111 | 2,076 | 5.1% | −25.7— | −19.9— | +5.8— | −1.8— | +1.1— | +10.9— | −9.7— | +4.3— | −5.4— | +3.3— | +0.4— |
Player ON
What the team did while each player was on the floor.
| Possessions | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isaiah Walker | 1,815 | 372 | 83.0% | 4.3— | 113.6— | 109.3— | 54.2%— | 28.6%— | 15.0%— | 27.7%— | 53.5%— | 70.0%— | 18.0%— | 26.9%— |
| Carter Whitt | 1,744 | 444 | 79.7% | 0.6— | 113.4— | 112.9— | 54.6%— | 28.7%— | 15.5%— | 25.8%— | 54.0%— | 67.9%— | 17.4%— | 28.7%— |
| Jonathan Pierre | 1,583 | 604 | 72.4% | 3.7— | 114.3— | 110.6— | 55.4%— | 29.3%— | 16.1%— | 26.2%— | 53.7%— | 69.3%— | 17.6%— | 26.2%— |
| Tyler Lundblade | 1,567 | 620 | 71.7% | 0.9— | 113.7— | 112.8— | 56.3%— | 26.3%— | 15.6%— | 25.2%— | 54.4%— | 69.0%— | 17.5%— | 29.8%— |
| Brigham Rogers | 1,190 | 997 | 54.4% | 5.6— | 110.8— | 105.2— | 55.2%— | 28.7%— | 17.2%— | 21.9%— | 52.0%— | 69.1%— | 19.2%— | 24.9%— |
| Sam Orme | 857 | 1,330 | 39.2% | 4.8— | 114.3— | 109.5— | 51.7%— | 31.1%— | 13.8%— | 31.4%— | 52.7%— | 69.5%— | 17.6%— | 27.9%— |
| Brody Peebles | 833 | 1,354 | 38.1% | 4.9— | 113.1— | 108.2— | 56.2%— | 27.5%— | 16.0%— | 22.0%— | 54.4%— | 72.4%— | 18.4%— | 25.1%— |
| Aidan Noyes | 695 | 1,493 | 31.8% | 3.0— | 114.5— | 111.4— | 55.7%— | 27.5%— | 14.7%— | 25.4%— | 53.7%— | 66.6%— | 17.0%— | 22.9%— |
| Drew Scharnowski | 447 | 1,740 | 20.4% | 0.0— | 116.4— | 116.4— | 57.7%— | 30.6%— | 16.1%— | 23.4%— | 56.5%— | 65.5%— | 18.9%— | 22.2%— |
| Win Miller | 111 | 2,076 | 5.1% | -21.6— | 94.5— | 116.1— | 53.3%— | 29.6%— | 26.1%— | 16.5%— | 57.9%— | 63.8%— | 21.0%— | 27.4%— |
Player OFF
What the team did while each player sat.
| Possessions | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isaiah Walker | 1,815 | 372 | 83.0% | -5.3— | 112.0— | 117.4— | 59.4%— | 28.1%— | 19.1%— | 16.3%— | 55.1%— | 64.0%— | 17.3%— | 27.1%— |
| Carter Whitt | 1,744 | 444 | 79.7% | 11.2— | 112.9— | 101.8— | 56.8%— | 27.8%— | 16.7%— | 25.5%— | 52.8%— | 73.3%— | 20.2%— | 19.7%— |
| Jonathan Pierre | 1,583 | 604 | 72.4% | 0.3— | 110.9— | 110.6— | 54.1%— | 26.7%— | 14.7%— | 24.7%— | 53.9%— | 68.1%— | 18.7%— | 28.9%— |
| Tyler Lundblade | 1,567 | 620 | 71.7% | 6.8— | 112.5— | 105.7— | 52.0%— | 33.4%— | 16.1%— | 27.0%— | 52.5%— | 68.8%— | 19.0%— | 20.6%— |
| Brigham Rogers | 1,190 | 997 | 54.4% | -1.1— | 116.4— | 117.4— | 54.8%— | 28.3%— | 13.9%— | 30.4%— | 56.0%— | 68.8%— | 16.3%— | 29.5%— |
| Sam Orme | 857 | 1,330 | 39.2% | 1.4— | 112.7— | 111.3— | 57.3%— | 26.7%— | 17.0%— | 22.0%— | 54.5%— | 68.6%— | 18.1%— | 26.3%— |
| Brody Peebles | 833 | 1,354 | 38.1% | 1.4— | 113.5— | 112.1— | 54.3%— | 29.2%— | 15.6%— | 28.1%— | 53.4%— | 66.9%— | 17.7%— | 28.0%— |
| Aidan Noyes | 695 | 1,493 | 31.8% | 2.6— | 112.8— | 110.2— | 54.8%— | 29.0%— | 16.2%— | 26.0%— | 53.8%— | 70.2%— | 18.4%— | 29.0%— |
| Drew Scharnowski | 447 | 1,740 | 20.4% | 3.5— | 112.6— | 109.0— | 54.4%— | 28.0%— | 15.6%— | 26.4%— | 53.0%— | 69.8%— | 17.7%— | 28.3%— |
| Win Miller | 111 | 2,076 | 5.1% | 4.0— | 114.4— | 110.3— | 55.1%— | 28.5%— | 15.2%— | 26.2%— | 53.5%— | 69.2%— | 17.8%— | 26.9%— |
How to read this
An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.
Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.
In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.
Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.