Binghamton13-15

America EastCoach: Levell Sanders

13-15NET#272

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Armon Harried	1,350	302	81.7%	+1.656	+3.468	+1.840	−1.436	+7.996	+2.912	−2.140	−1.262	+2.070	−3.88	−4.874
Dan Petcash	1,289	363	78.0%	+11.888	+8.186	−3.768	+3.080	+3.178	+0.246	+8.088	−4.386	+2.978	−2.120	+8.512
Tymu Chenery	1,157	495	70.0%	+12.688	+16.8100	+4.326	+6.696	+2.876	−2.380	+5.280	−0.252	−1.240	−3.78	−7.584
Symir Torrence	1,052	601	63.6%	−10.018	−2.936	+7.116	−1.336	−1.934	−1.976	−7.116	+0.050	−9.14	−0.346	+0.644
Nehemiah Benson	969	683	58.7%	+5.972	+6.782	+0.844	+2.878	+1.060	−2.078	−1.344	+4.98	+6.596	+0.458	−2.664
Tariq Balogun	797	855	48.2%	−0.648	−8.514	−7.984	−4.512	−2.628	+0.738	+5.982	−8.096	−3.520	−1.428	−7.484
Gavin Walsh	634	1,019	38.3%	−5.532	−6.918	−1.456	−0.942	−3.422	+1.132	−4.030	+3.616	+8.498	+0.864	+6.716
Chris Walker	630	1,023	38.1%	−1.146	−1.444	−0.350	−2.526	+2.976	−1.572	−7.116	−0.050	−6.18	+4.596	+8.212
Evan Ashe	229	1,423	13.9%	−18.86	−10.510	+8.312	−4.910	−4.714	+0.738	+0.152	+6.64	−4.514	+3.694	+2.236

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Armon Harried	1,350	302	81.7%	-5.038	104.640	109.642	50.0%42	33.2%58	19.1%32	32.2%56	50.0%54	73.3%70	13.2%24	32.5%38
Dan Petcash	1,289	363	78.0%	-2.742	105.842	108.546	50.9%48	32.4%58	18.6%36	34.3%62	49.2%54	73.5%70	13.4%26	35.3%32
Tymu Chenery	1,157	495	70.0%	-1.544	109.150	110.540	52.2%56	32.6%58	17.9%40	34.1%62	50.1%50	72.6%66	12.8%22	31.3%42
Symir Torrence	1,052	601	63.6%	-8.932	103.036	111.936	49.8%42	31.0%52	17.9%40	30.0%50	50.2%48	69.6%54	13.8%28	33.6%34
Nehemiah Benson	969	683	58.7%	-2.842	106.844	109.642	51.4%50	32.1%56	17.7%40	32.0%56	52.3%40	75.7%78	14.0%30	32.3%38
Tariq Balogun	797	855	48.2%	-5.538	99.628	105.154	47.9%36	30.3%48	18.9%34	35.6%66	46.2%68	71.2%60	13.1%24	29.6%46
Gavin Walsh	634	1,019	38.3%	-8.732	99.828	108.446	49.7%42	29.6%46	19.3%30	30.1%50	52.5%40	78.2%86	14.4%32	37.6%26
Chris Walker	630	1,023	38.1%	-6.036	103.236	109.144	48.8%38	33.4%62	17.6%42	28.3%46	50.2%48	69.2%50	16.6%48	38.5%24
Evan Ashe	229	1,423	13.9%	-21.418	95.020	116.426	46.1%28	27.6%38	19.2%32	32.6%58	56.0%24	69.0%50	17.0%50	35.2%32

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Armon Harried	1,350	302	81.7%	-6.636	101.232	107.846	51.4%50	25.3%28	16.2%52	34.3%62	51.2%46	71.3%60	17.0%50	37.3%26
Dan Petcash	1,289	363	78.0%	-14.524	97.726	112.136	47.9%36	29.3%44	18.4%36	26.3%40	53.5%34	70.6%56	15.5%40	26.8%56
Tymu Chenery	1,157	495	70.0%	-14.126	92.218	106.350	45.6%26	29.8%46	20.2%24	28.9%48	50.4%48	73.8%72	16.5%46	38.8%24
Symir Torrence	1,052	601	63.6%	1.148	105.842	104.854	51.1%50	32.9%58	19.8%28	37.1%68	50.2%48	78.7%86	14.1%30	32.9%38
Nehemiah Benson	969	683	58.7%	-8.732	100.130	108.844	48.6%38	31.1%52	19.8%28	33.3%60	47.3%64	69.2%52	13.7%28	34.9%32
Tariq Balogun	797	855	48.2%	-4.938	108.148	113.034	52.3%56	33.0%58	18.2%38	29.8%50	54.2%32	74.7%74	14.5%34	37.0%28
Gavin Walsh	634	1,019	38.3%	-3.240	106.744	109.842	50.6%48	33.0%58	18.2%38	34.1%62	48.9%56	69.9%54	13.5%26	30.9%44
Chris Walker	630	1,023	38.1%	-4.838	104.540	109.442	51.2%50	30.5%50	19.2%32	35.4%64	50.2%48	75.3%78	12.1%20	30.3%44
Evan Ashe	229	1,423	13.9%	-2.742	105.542	108.146	50.9%48	32.4%58	18.5%36	32.5%58	49.3%54	73.5%70	13.4%26	33.1%36

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.