Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Bowling Green logoBowling Green logoBowling Green logoBowling Green logo

Bowling Green18-14

MACCoach: Todd Simon

18-14NET#227

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Marcus Hill+2.762+8.186+5.322+1.364+4.888+0.246+16.5100+0.246−2.726−3.212−13.696
Jason Spurgin+15.192+5.678−9.590+3.382−4.418−2.884+3.472+0.544+6.596+3.692−8.586
Trey Thomas+4.266+4.574+0.348−2.922+6.594−0.860+2.164−0.556−0.248−0.150+3.828
Rashaun Agee−5.332−5.026+0.348−2.328+6.794+3.210−6.918+0.642+1.868−0.938−6.280
Da'Shawn Phillip+4.368+3.168−1.156+0.052+0.556−1.164+2.566+0.444+4.688−1.726−7.784
DaJion Humphrey−2.840−0.548+2.336+2.576−0.944+1.230−2.240+0.642−1.042−0.740+6.020
Sam Towns+0.352−3.234−3.566−2.128+2.572+2.814+2.766−1.868+0.152−0.248−1.558
P.J. Edwards−12.214−0.348+11.96+3.584−6.68−1.266−7.216+2.228−7.46−2.120+0.346
EJay Greer−1.246−2.638−1.356+0.758−3.324+0.542−3.036+1.832−0.644+4.196+11.94
DJ Smith+11.186+6.380−4.874+4.992−4.516−2.986−7.116−1.566−2.132+3.994+4.226
Anthony McComb III−6.228−17.92−11.794−9.42−7.56−2.480+13.198−10.898−2.628−0.248+13.82

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Marcus Hill1.248106.044104.85448.3%3632.6%5816.5%5035.9%6650.8%4871.8%6416.4%4626.0%58
Jason Spurgin4.754106.544101.86249.0%4031.0%5215.8%5435.0%6450.9%4673.9%7217.6%5425.1%60
Trey Thomas2.450106.744104.35647.2%3234.1%6416.2%5234.8%6450.6%4872.0%6416.7%4828.6%50
Rashaun Agee-0.944103.436104.35647.4%3434.4%6417.6%4231.8%5651.0%4672.8%6816.4%4625.1%60
Da'Shawn Phillip2.852106.644103.75648.2%3632.3%5616.0%5235.2%6450.9%4674.1%7416.0%4424.0%66
DaJion Humphrey-0.346105.040105.35449.3%4231.7%5417.0%4633.1%5851.1%4671.7%6216.4%4630.0%46
Sam Towns1.148103.036101.96246.7%3033.8%6418.4%3636.0%6649.6%5472.1%6416.5%4826.3%58
P.J. Edwards-7.834105.040112.83450.7%4827.2%3615.6%5628.9%4852.3%4066.9%4215.2%3827.5%54
EJay Greer-0.046103.136103.15848.7%3829.4%4616.8%4631.7%5652.2%4071.6%6220.1%7037.1%26
DJ Smith11.066110.95499.96652.6%5828.0%3813.9%6827.7%4449.4%5470.2%5620.3%7231.1%42
Anthony McComb III-4.93888.21293.18039.2%1025.0%2614.2%6646.6%8440.4%8869.7%5416.5%4640.4%22

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Marcus Hill-1.54497.92699.46847.0%3227.8%3816.3%5019.4%2050.6%4874.6%7419.5%6839.5%22
Jason Spurgin-10.430100.932111.33845.7%2635.4%7018.6%3631.6%5450.4%4867.3%4214.0%3033.5%34
Trey Thomas-1.844102.234104.05650.2%4627.6%3617.0%4632.7%5851.1%4672.3%6616.8%4824.8%62
Rashaun Agee4.554108.548104.05649.7%4227.7%3814.4%6638.7%7250.4%4870.9%5817.3%5231.3%42
Da'Shawn Phillip-1.544103.436104.95448.1%3631.8%5417.1%4632.7%5850.5%4869.5%5217.7%5631.7%40
DaJion Humphrey2.550105.442102.95846.8%3032.6%5815.8%5435.3%6450.4%4872.6%6617.1%5024.0%66
Sam Towns0.848106.244105.35248.8%4031.3%5215.6%5633.3%6051.3%4472.1%6416.8%4827.7%54
P.J. Edwards4.454105.342100.96447.2%3233.8%6416.8%4836.1%6650.1%5074.2%7417.3%5227.2%54
EJay Greer1.248105.742104.55648.0%3632.7%5816.4%5034.7%6250.5%4872.2%6615.9%4425.2%60
DJ Smith-0.146104.640104.75447.7%3432.5%5816.7%4834.8%6450.9%4672.3%6616.3%4626.9%56
Anthony McComb III1.348106.144104.85448.6%3832.5%5816.6%4833.5%6051.3%4672.3%6616.7%4826.6%56
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.