Bradley27-9

MVCCoach: Brian Wardle

27-9NET#85

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Duke Deen	1,868	443	80.8%	+4.368	−1.244	−5.678	−1.634	−1.438	−0.964	−1.246	−2.878	+2.172	−1.724	−6.080
Christian Davis	1,829	481	79.2%	−15.88	−12.36	+3.630	−5.310	−7.26	−0.454	+2.868	+4.78	−0.348	+1.880	−1.156
Darius Hannah	1,631	679	70.6%	+3.162	−1.444	−4.574	−0.050	+0.354	−0.150	−0.548	+0.544	+3.784	+2.284	−2.464
Zek Montgomery	1,627	684	70.4%	+13.992	−0.250	−14.196	+0.656	−3.124	−1.674	−4.526	−8.698	+2.576	−0.936	−2.664
Almar Atlason	988	1,322	42.8%	−6.328	+3.370	+9.68	−0.150	−2.528	−3.592	−10.56	+5.94	−7.94	+2.990	−0.954
Ahmet Jonovic	923	1,387	39.9%	+4.268	−2.040	−6.280	+0.556	−0.646	+0.540	+2.868	−2.778	+5.292	−2.020	−7.786
Jaquan Johnson	903	1,407	39.1%	+0.754	+5.078	+4.326	+0.252	+4.588	+0.148	+6.484	+3.118	+0.052	+2.082	+9.58
Corey Thomas	608	1,702	26.3%	+5.472	+1.258	−4.272	+3.282	+0.758	+4.06	+2.064	−3.986	+1.062	−1.922	+5.520
Demarion Burch	481	1,829	20.8%	−7.026	+3.168	+10.28	+2.880	−1.636	−0.760	−5.522	+5.66	+1.466	−1.330	+1.442
Connor Dillon	477	1,833	20.6%	−5.530	+2.566	+8.112	−1.436	+9.6100	+2.714	+7.688	+0.346	−2.824	−1.328	+8.212
Timoty van der Knaap	135	2,175	5.8%	+5.772	−3.432	−9.190	−0.546	−4.514	−0.558	+17.3100	−6.396	−0.150	−1.428	+1.442

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Duke Deen	1,868	443	80.8%	7.960	113.660	105.654	56.0%70	27.8%38	17.4%44	32.0%56	47.3%66	68.8%50	15.6%38	34.3%36
Christian Davis	1,829	481	79.2%	3.854	111.354	107.548	55.1%66	26.6%32	17.5%42	32.8%58	48.8%58	68.3%46	16.2%44	35.2%34
Darius Hannah	1,631	679	70.6%	8.060	113.460	105.454	56.3%72	28.1%40	17.5%42	32.0%56	48.0%62	69.5%52	16.5%46	34.7%36
Zek Montgomery	1,627	684	70.4%	11.266	113.760	102.562	56.4%72	27.1%36	17.1%46	30.9%52	45.3%74	69.1%50	15.6%40	34.6%36
Almar Atlason	988	1,322	42.8%	3.452	115.766	112.336	56.2%72	26.7%34	15.6%58	26.4%38	51.2%48	63.8%30	17.6%54	34.8%34
Ahmet Jonovic	923	1,387	39.9%	9.564	112.658	103.160	56.5%72	27.6%38	17.9%40	33.9%60	46.2%70	71.5%62	14.7%32	30.9%44
Jaquan Johnson	903	1,407	39.1%	7.560	116.968	109.344	56.4%72	30.8%50	17.6%42	36.1%66	49.8%54	68.4%48	17.1%50	41.3%22
Corey Thomas	608	1,702	26.3%	11.166	114.764	103.658	58.7%80	28.6%42	20.5%22	33.7%60	45.0%74	69.1%50	14.5%32	39.4%24
Demarion Burch	481	1,829	20.8%	1.550	116.366	114.830	58.5%80	26.8%34	17.1%46	27.8%44	52.3%42	69.5%52	14.9%34	36.5%30
Connor Dillon	477	1,833	20.6%	2.752	115.866	113.134	55.2%68	35.6%68	19.7%28	38.2%70	48.1%62	66.2%38	14.8%34	41.9%20
Timoty van der Knaap	135	2,175	5.8%	12.468	110.652	98.172	55.8%70	23.8%22	17.1%46	48.5%86	41.9%84	68.3%46	14.6%32	36.8%30

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Duke Deen	1,868	443	80.8%	3.654	114.864	111.238	57.5%76	29.2%44	18.3%38	33.2%58	50.1%50	66.7%38	17.2%50	40.2%22
Christian Davis	1,829	481	79.2%	19.678	123.582	103.958	60.4%86	33.8%62	17.9%40	30.0%50	44.1%78	68.6%48	14.5%32	36.2%30
Darius Hannah	1,631	679	70.6%	4.956	114.864	109.942	56.3%72	27.8%38	17.7%42	32.6%58	47.5%64	65.8%38	14.3%30	37.1%28
Zek Montgomery	1,627	684	70.4%	-2.742	114.062	116.726	55.9%70	30.2%48	18.7%34	35.4%64	53.9%34	66.6%38	16.5%46	37.2%28
Almar Atlason	988	1,322	42.8%	9.764	112.458	102.760	56.3%72	29.2%44	19.1%32	36.9%68	45.3%74	71.7%62	14.6%32	35.8%32
Ahmet Jonovic	923	1,387	39.9%	5.356	114.662	109.344	56.1%72	28.3%40	17.4%44	31.1%54	48.9%58	66.3%38	16.7%46	38.5%26
Jaquan Johnson	903	1,407	39.1%	6.858	111.856	105.154	56.2%72	26.3%32	17.6%42	29.7%48	46.7%68	68.4%48	15.1%36	31.9%42
Corey Thomas	608	1,702	26.3%	5.656	113.560	107.848	55.5%68	27.9%38	16.5%50	31.7%54	48.9%58	68.1%46	16.4%44	34.0%36
Demarion Burch	481	1,829	20.8%	8.562	113.160	104.756	55.7%70	28.4%40	17.7%42	33.4%60	46.7%68	68.1%46	16.1%42	35.1%34
Connor Dillon	477	1,833	20.6%	8.262	113.360	105.154	56.5%72	26.0%30	17.0%46	30.6%52	47.8%64	69.0%50	16.2%42	33.7%38
Timoty van der Knaap	135	2,175	5.8%	6.758	114.062	107.350	56.3%72	28.3%40	17.6%42	31.3%54	48.2%62	68.4%48	16.0%42	35.3%34

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.