Bradley20-13

MVCCoach: Brian Wardle

20-13NET#114

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Alex Huibregtse	1,737	527	76.7%	+3.664	+3.772	+0.148	+3.082	−2.032	−1.066	−9.98	+3.018	−2.626	+2.688	−12.394
Jaquan Johnson	1,666	598	73.6%	+9.384	+5.078	−4.372	+0.860	+1.162	−1.472	+6.784	−4.288	+1.060	−0.836	−3.168
AJ Smith	1,403	862	61.9%	+13.592	+8.490	−5.176	+6.296	+3.684	+1.920	−4.926	+1.334	+3.886	+2.890	+2.932
Ahmet Jonovic	1,334	930	58.9%	+3.464	+2.866	−0.652	+4.290	−1.140	+1.230	−2.238	−5.392	−3.420	−3.96	−13.996
Timoty van der Knaap	1,261	1,004	55.7%	−10.716	−4.228	+6.516	−5.210	+8.598	+1.822	+2.466	+1.928	+2.576	−3.48	+1.242
Montana Wheeler	1,235	1,030	54.5%	+0.452	+1.458	+1.042	+0.860	−0.348	−1.064	+0.454	+0.148	−1.336	+1.170	+11.16
Corey Thomas	993	1,272	43.8%	+7.378	+2.566	−4.876	+2.072	−2.628	−0.354	+4.074	−1.868	+0.354	+1.374	+3.530
Demarion Burch	969	1,296	42.8%	−7.724	−5.124	+2.634	−2.922	−1.934	−0.964	−7.116	+0.544	−1.534	−0.346	+5.620
Kai Yu	392	1,873	17.3%	−16.38	−10.610	+5.818	−6.76	−3.620	−2.584	−3.632	+7.82	+0.152	+3.192	−1.258
Dietrich Richardson	205	2,060	9.0%	−12.712	−12.76	−0.150	−7.64	−2.230	+2.316	+13.698	+2.622	−1.336	+1.068	−9.390
Matthew Zobrist	102	2,162	4.5%	−10.616	−6.618	+4.126	−5.68	−11.32	−2.484	+23.8100	−1.768	+4.690	−5.72	+5.818

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Alex Huibregtse	1,737	527	76.7%	4.252	110.750	106.552	51.6%46	27.0%38	13.8%66	32.6%48	53.5%38	71.4%56	19.3%72	35.2%40
Jaquan Johnson	1,666	598	73.6%	5.956	111.152	105.354	51.1%44	27.8%42	13.7%66	36.6%58	51.6%48	72.3%60	18.4%66	37.4%36
AJ Smith	1,403	862	61.9%	8.560	113.056	104.556	53.2%54	29.0%46	14.8%58	32.9%50	53.3%40	73.5%66	19.7%74	39.3%30
Ahmet Jonovic	1,334	930	58.9%	4.854	111.050	106.252	52.6%52	27.0%38	14.5%60	33.9%52	50.7%52	70.7%52	17.1%58	33.0%46
Timoty van der Knaap	1,261	1,004	55.7%	-1.342	108.042	109.344	48.6%34	31.0%54	14.8%58	35.8%56	53.5%38	73.1%64	17.2%58	38.7%32
Montana Wheeler	1,235	1,030	54.5%	3.652	110.550	106.950	51.2%44	27.4%40	13.6%66	35.0%54	52.8%42	71.4%56	19.1%72	43.4%22
Corey Thomas	993	1,272	43.8%	7.558	111.252	103.760	52.0%50	26.0%34	13.9%64	37.1%60	51.7%46	72.2%60	19.4%72	40.2%28
Demarion Burch	969	1,296	42.8%	-1.044	106.940	107.948	49.2%36	26.4%36	13.5%68	30.8%44	53.0%40	71.2%54	18.5%68	41.4%26
Kai Yu	392	1,873	17.3%	-10.130	101.128	111.240	45.4%22	24.6%28	12.0%76	31.9%46	59.2%18	72.1%60	21.2%82	37.2%36
Dietrich Richardson	205	2,060	9.0%	-8.132	98.222	106.452	43.9%16	25.5%32	16.1%46	47.2%78	55.2%32	70.8%54	19.6%74	29.7%56
Matthew Zobrist	102	2,162	4.5%	-6.834	103.532	110.342	45.5%22	16.7%8	11.7%78	57.7%90	51.1%50	76.4%76	13.2%28	43.7%22

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Alex Huibregtse	1,737	527	76.7%	0.646	107.040	106.352	48.5%34	29.0%46	14.8%58	42.4%70	50.5%52	74.0%68	16.7%54	47.5%16
Jaquan Johnson	1,666	598	73.6%	-3.440	106.238	109.644	50.3%42	26.7%36	15.0%56	29.9%40	55.9%28	71.3%56	19.2%72	40.5%28
AJ Smith	1,403	862	61.9%	-5.038	104.636	109.644	47.0%26	25.3%32	12.9%72	37.9%62	52.0%46	69.7%48	16.9%56	36.4%38
Ahmet Jonovic	1,334	930	58.9%	1.448	108.244	106.852	48.4%32	28.1%42	13.3%68	36.1%58	56.0%28	74.1%68	21.0%80	46.8%18
Timoty van der Knaap	1,261	1,004	55.7%	9.462	112.254	102.762	53.8%58	22.5%22	13.0%70	33.5%52	51.7%46	70.6%52	20.6%78	37.5%36
Montana Wheeler	1,235	1,030	54.5%	3.252	109.046	105.954	50.5%42	27.6%40	14.6%60	34.6%54	52.7%42	72.7%62	18.1%64	32.3%48
Corey Thomas	993	1,272	43.8%	0.246	108.744	108.646	50.0%36	28.6%46	14.2%62	33.1%50	53.5%38	71.8%58	18.1%64	36.7%38
Demarion Burch	969	1,296	42.8%	6.758	112.054	105.354	52.1%50	28.4%44	14.4%60	37.9%62	52.5%42	72.6%62	18.8%70	35.8%40
Kai Yu	392	1,873	17.3%	6.256	111.652	105.454	52.1%50	28.2%44	14.5%60	35.5%56	51.4%48	72.0%58	18.1%64	38.4%32
Dietrich Richardson	205	2,060	9.0%	4.554	111.050	106.452	51.5%46	27.7%40	13.8%64	33.7%52	52.5%42	72.1%60	18.6%68	39.0%32
Matthew Zobrist	102	2,162	4.5%	3.952	110.148	106.252	51.1%44	28.0%42	14.2%62	33.9%52	52.8%42	71.8%58	18.9%70	37.9%34

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.