Brown13-13

IvyCoach: Mike Martin

13-13NET#214

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Aaron Cooley	1,091	347	75.9%	+12.490	+7.888	−4.674	+4.892	+2.776	+0.640	+0.454	−1.060	−1.438	+2.386	−10.492
Landon Lewis	966	471	67.2%	−3.040	−2.538	+0.546	+2.778	−3.224	+3.010	−1.840	−0.252	−3.618	+1.068	−2.362
Alexander Lesburt Jr.	892	546	62.0%	+1.858	+5.378	+3.530	+3.686	−2.232	−1.166	−2.338	+2.622	+2.776	−0.642	+2.336
Lyndel Erold	768	670	53.4%	−0.250	+1.258	+1.442	−1.336	−0.052	−2.280	+0.756	−0.556	−2.328	−0.248	−1.156
Malcolm Wrisby-Jefferson	727	710	50.6%	+5.572	+5.378	−0.250	+4.290	−0.448	−1.166	−7.116	+1.532	−1.436	+1.880	−6.782
N'famara Dabo	501	936	34.9%	−4.136	−3.134	+1.044	−3.518	+3.482	−0.252	+2.566	+0.740	+4.590	−2.118	−0.150
Jeremiah Jenkins	328	1,109	22.8%	+4.970	+0.052	−4.876	−2.228	+7.496	+3.86	+7.286	−0.858	−0.150	+1.676	+2.734
David Rochester	243	1,194	16.9%	−4.534	−3.732	+0.844	−3.418	−3.026	−0.558	+3.370	+0.048	+0.758	−0.542	+15.12
Adrian Uchidiuno	164	1,273	11.4%	−4.236	−3.930	+0.348	−4.812	+3.682	−1.976	+5.782	−2.878	+3.684	−0.542	+15.52

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Aaron Cooley	1,091	347	75.9%	5.056	109.150	104.156	53.1%58	32.2%56	17.1%46	25.7%36	48.6%60	67.6%44	17.0%48	25.5%62
Landon Lewis	966	471	67.2%	1.048	106.442	105.454	52.8%56	30.4%48	17.9%40	25.0%34	48.7%58	66.7%42	16.7%46	27.3%56
Alexander Lesburt Jr.	892	546	62.0%	2.652	109.250	106.650	53.3%60	30.7%50	16.5%50	24.7%34	49.8%54	69.0%50	16.2%44	29.0%50
Lyndel Erold	768	670	53.4%	1.950	107.846	105.952	51.3%50	31.5%52	15.9%56	25.9%38	48.6%60	66.9%42	16.3%44	27.5%56
Malcolm Wrisby-Jefferson	727	710	50.6%	4.756	109.952	105.154	53.9%62	31.3%52	16.4%52	22.2%26	49.5%56	67.2%42	17.3%52	24.8%64
N'famara Dabo	501	936	34.9%	-0.746	105.240	105.952	49.7%40	33.7%62	16.8%48	27.3%42	49.3%56	70.8%58	15.1%36	28.0%54
Jeremiah Jenkins	328	1,109	22.8%	5.756	107.244	101.664	50.2%46	37.1%74	19.8%26	31.2%54	48.2%62	67.9%44	17.6%54	30.1%46
David Rochester	243	1,194	16.9%	-1.744	104.138	105.952	49.1%38	29.1%44	16.5%50	28.4%44	48.8%58	68.5%48	16.0%42	40.7%22
Adrian Uchidiuno	164	1,273	11.4%	-1.744	103.736	105.554	47.7%32	34.7%66	15.3%60	30.7%52	46.3%70	71.1%60	15.9%42	41.9%20

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Aaron Cooley	1,091	347	75.9%	-7.434	101.332	108.746	48.2%34	29.6%44	16.4%50	25.3%36	49.5%56	69.0%50	14.6%32	35.9%32
Landon Lewis	966	471	67.2%	4.054	108.950	104.954	50.1%46	33.6%62	14.9%64	26.8%40	49.0%58	70.3%56	15.7%40	29.6%48
Alexander Lesburt Jr.	892	546	62.0%	0.848	103.936	103.160	49.7%40	32.9%58	17.6%42	27.0%40	47.3%66	66.4%38	16.7%46	26.7%58
Lyndel Erold	768	670	53.4%	2.150	106.644	104.556	52.6%56	31.5%52	18.1%38	25.3%36	49.1%56	69.2%50	16.5%46	28.7%52
Malcolm Wrisby-Jefferson	727	710	50.6%	-0.846	104.538	105.354	49.8%40	31.7%54	17.5%44	29.3%48	48.0%62	68.7%48	15.5%38	31.5%42
N'famara Dabo	501	936	34.9%	3.452	108.348	104.954	53.1%58	30.3%48	17.0%46	24.7%34	48.5%60	66.3%38	17.2%50	28.1%54
Jeremiah Jenkins	328	1,109	22.8%	0.848	107.244	106.452	52.4%54	29.7%46	16.0%54	24.0%30	49.0%58	68.0%46	16.0%42	27.4%56
David Rochester	243	1,194	16.9%	2.752	107.846	105.154	52.5%54	32.1%56	17.0%46	25.1%36	48.8%58	67.8%44	16.5%46	25.5%62
Adrian Uchidiuno	164	1,273	11.4%	2.552	107.746	105.254	52.5%54	31.1%52	17.1%46	25.0%34	49.1%56	67.6%44	16.5%44	26.4%58

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.