Cal St. Bakersfield11-19

Big WestCoach: Rod Barnes

11-19NET#248

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kaleb Higgins	1,487	345	81.2%	+6.172	+4.674	−1.558	+3.584	−4.218	−3.690	−7.814	+1.930	+5.190	−0.248	−4.674
Marvin McGhee III	1,219	614	66.5%	−13.012	−13.06	−0.048	−4.414	−6.58	+0.540	−14.52	−2.474	+2.674	−3.012	+1.342
Modestas Kancleris	973	859	53.1%	+2.460	−3.434	−5.878	+1.364	−5.810	−1.976	−8.812	−2.070	+4.186	−0.740	−12.094
Tom Mark	932	900	50.9%	+11.888	+2.866	−9.088	+1.062	−1.636	−1.368	+7.086	−6.594	−2.430	+2.080	−5.978
Cameron Wilbon	905	928	49.4%	−4.634	−2.538	+2.138	−0.248	−1.042	+0.540	+2.062	+3.816	−2.232	+2.282	−9.790
Fidelis Okereke	889	944	48.5%	+2.158	−0.946	−3.064	+3.382	+0.152	+4.26	+1.158	+0.248	+1.262	−0.150	−9.188
Corey Stephenson	709	1,124	38.7%	+7.476	+6.984	−0.552	+2.778	+6.994	+2.218	+2.164	−5.290	−3.818	−0.248	+18.60
Naseem Gaskin	616	1,217	33.6%	−3.836	−4.726	−0.954	−1.932	+1.060	+3.68	+8.990	+0.544	−4.016	+3.190	+2.138
Dalph Panopio	445	1,387	24.3%	+6.374	+8.588	+2.238	+2.980	−1.834	−2.582	+11.596	+0.940	−0.942	−0.150	+15.12
Jaden Alexander	373	1,459	20.4%	−0.946	+6.882	+7.714	−2.228	+6.794	−3.490	+0.656	+5.56	+5.592	−1.824	+2.336
Ugnius Jarusevicius	371	1,462	20.2%	−11.116	−6.222	+4.924	−7.64	+2.574	−1.672	−5.322	+1.534	−1.438	−1.824	+2.734
Kareem Watson	244	1,589	13.3%	−10.318	+7.986	+18.10	+0.252	+9.198	+0.342	+2.768	+10.70	−2.330	−2.022	+12.94

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kaleb Higgins	1,487	345	81.2%	-3.440	104.338	107.646	47.8%34	34.7%66	17.9%40	31.0%54	50.7%48	68.0%46	18.9%64	47.0%14
Marvin McGhee III	1,219	614	66.5%	-8.932	99.028	107.946	45.7%26	33.5%62	18.7%34	27.7%44	49.4%54	67.8%44	17.9%56	48.4%12
Modestas Kancleris	973	859	53.1%	-3.440	101.834	105.254	47.7%34	32.8%58	17.7%42	28.4%46	49.3%54	68.9%50	18.6%62	42.5%18
Tom Mark	932	900	50.9%	1.148	104.840	103.758	47.7%34	34.8%66	17.9%40	36.0%66	47.2%64	65.8%36	19.9%70	45.2%14
Cameron Wilbon	905	928	49.4%	-6.936	102.234	109.044	47.0%32	35.1%68	18.8%34	33.5%60	52.1%40	65.8%36	20.0%70	43.2%18
Fidelis Okereke	889	944	48.5%	-3.540	102.936	106.450	48.9%40	35.6%70	20.7%22	33.0%58	50.3%48	67.5%44	18.9%64	43.4%16
Corey Stephenson	709	1,124	38.7%	-0.046	107.646	107.746	48.8%40	39.9%82	19.9%26	33.8%60	47.1%64	64.6%32	18.8%64	59.4%6
Naseem Gaskin	616	1,217	33.6%	-7.134	100.330	107.448	45.9%28	36.3%72	20.9%22	38.5%70	50.6%48	64.3%32	20.9%76	49.3%10
Dalph Panopio	445	1,387	24.3%	0.146	109.952	109.742	49.3%42	34.2%64	16.6%48	41.3%76	51.0%46	66.2%38	18.9%64	59.9%4
Jaden Alexander	373	1,459	20.4%	-5.338	108.850	114.132	45.5%26	40.8%86	15.8%54	33.0%58	54.7%30	71.4%60	17.5%54	49.8%10
Ugnius Jarusevicius	371	1,462	20.2%	-13.426	98.526	111.936	41.2%12	37.6%78	17.3%44	28.3%46	51.4%44	65.8%36	17.5%54	50.2%10
Kareem Watson	244	1,589	13.3%	-13.426	110.254	123.614	47.3%32	43.4%90	18.8%34	34.8%64	59.5%14	64.9%34	17.2%52	59.3%6

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kaleb Higgins	1,487	345	81.2%	-9.530	99.728	109.144	44.3%22	39.0%82	21.4%18	38.8%72	48.7%58	62.9%26	19.1%64	51.6%10
Marvin McGhee III	1,219	614	66.5%	4.154	112.158	108.046	50.1%46	40.0%82	18.2%38	42.2%78	51.9%42	65.1%34	20.9%76	47.1%12
Modestas Kancleris	973	859	53.1%	-5.836	105.242	111.138	46.5%30	38.7%80	19.6%28	37.2%68	51.3%44	64.7%32	19.3%66	54.5%8
Tom Mark	932	900	50.9%	-10.730	102.034	112.634	46.6%30	36.4%72	19.2%30	28.9%48	53.7%34	68.2%48	17.9%56	51.1%10
Cameron Wilbon	905	928	49.4%	-2.342	104.640	106.948	47.3%32	36.1%72	18.3%38	31.5%54	48.3%60	68.0%46	17.8%56	52.9%8
Fidelis Okereke	889	944	48.5%	-5.638	103.838	109.442	45.6%26	35.6%70	16.5%50	32.0%56	50.1%50	66.3%38	19.0%64	52.5%8
Corey Stephenson	709	1,124	38.7%	-7.434	100.732	108.146	46.1%28	33.0%58	17.7%40	31.6%56	52.2%40	68.4%48	19.0%64	40.8%20
Naseem Gaskin	616	1,217	33.6%	-3.340	105.040	108.346	47.8%34	35.3%68	17.3%44	29.6%50	50.1%50	68.4%48	17.8%56	47.2%12
Dalph Panopio	445	1,387	24.3%	-6.136	101.332	107.548	46.5%30	36.0%72	19.2%32	29.8%50	50.0%50	67.1%42	18.9%64	44.8%16
Jaden Alexander	373	1,459	20.4%	-4.440	102.034	106.450	47.6%34	34.1%64	19.3%30	32.3%58	49.1%56	65.9%36	19.3%66	47.5%12
Ugnius Jarusevicius	371	1,462	20.2%	-2.442	104.740	107.048	48.8%38	35.0%68	18.9%34	33.6%60	50.0%54	67.2%42	19.3%66	47.5%12
Kareem Watson	244	1,589	13.3%	-3.240	102.434	105.552	47.1%32	34.3%64	18.5%36	32.1%56	48.9%56	67.2%42	19.2%66	46.3%14

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Cal St. BakersfieldCSUB11-19

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Cal St. Bakersfield11-19