MAAC

Canisius

3-28NET#357Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #291Coach: Jim Christian

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,012	999	-22.1—	98.1—	120.2—	51.2%—	19.2%—	18.7%—	23.5%—	57.0%—	65.0%—	16.5%—	31.1%—
GodfreyD. GodfreyBenardA. BenardMcMillan IVP. McMillan IVKopaT. KopaPalesseC. Palesse	392	195	-3.5—	107.0—	110.5—	55.5%—	18.8%—	16.3%—	23.7%—	55.1%—	68.9%—	19.2%—	23.2%—
BenardA. BenardMcMillan IVP. McMillan IVKopaT. KopaSanghaJ. SanghaPalesseC. Palesse	236	126	-14.3—	109.0—	123.4—	52.9%—	21.1%—	13.2%—	25.5%—	51.8%—	64.7%—	8.9%—	34.8%—
GodfreyD. GodfreyBenardA. BenardMcMillan IVP. McMillan IVKopaT. KopaSanghaJ. Sangha	141	75	-23.1—	94.0—	117.1—	49.2%—	12.7%—	14.8%—	18.5%—	54.6%—	56.8%—	20.5%—	22.1%—
GodfreyD. GodfreyBenardA. BenardMcMillan IVP. McMillan IVKopaT. KopaThompsonG. Thompson	122	59	-24.7—	96.3—	121.0—	54.3%—	16.7%—	23.0%—	19.4%—	59.4%—	66.1%—	18.0%—	26.4%—
BenardA. BenardMcMillan IVP. McMillan IVKopaT. KopaThompsonG. ThompsonPalesseC. Palesse	102	54	-4.1—	114.9—	118.9—	64.5%—	16.2%—	19.6%—	32.9%—	53.8%—	61.5%—	17.3%—	32.6%—
van der PlasE. van der PlasMcMillan IVP. McMillan IVKopaT. KopaSanghaJ. SanghaPalesseC. Palesse	97	50	-5.8—	107.7—	113.4—	55.5%—	14.9%—	14.5%—	19.5%—	59.9%—	75.6%—	17.5%—	25.9%—
GodfreyD. Godfreyvan der PlasE. van der PlasBenardA. BenardKopaT. KopaPalesseC. Palesse	96	44	-45.6—	81.1—	126.7—	40.1%—	17.0%—	17.7%—	18.5%—	59.8%—	65.0%—	14.0%—	17.2%—
GodfreyD. Godfreyvan der PlasE. van der PlasMcMillan IVP. McMillan IVKopaT. KopaPalesseC. Palesse	78	38	-12.5—	102.3—	114.7—	51.4%—	27.3%—	19.2%—	15.7%—	60.9%—	85.7%—	16.2%—	43.8%—
van der PlasE. van der PlasBenardA. BenardKopaT. KopaThompsonG. ThompsonPalesseC. Palesse	46	23	-27.7—	97.3—	125.0—	50.0%—	25.0%—	19.5%—	23.1%—	68.1%—	81.3%—	17.9%—	22.2%—
GodfreyD. Godfreyvan der PlasE. van der PlasBenardA. BenardKopaT. KopaThompsonG. Thompson	44	25	-44.4—	56.2—	100.6—	35.7%—	16.7%—	29.2%—	2.9%—	47.6%—	56.5%—	23.1%—	29.3%—
GodfreyD. Godfreyvan der PlasE. van der PlasBenardA. BenardMcMillan IVP. McMillan IVPalesseC. Palesse	43	21	-56.4—	52.9—	109.3—	27.5%—	19.4%—	20.7%—	2.5%—	51.5%—	55.0%—	24.3%—	38.2%—
van der PlasE. van der PlasMcMillan IVP. McMillan IVKopaT. KopaThompsonG. ThompsonSanghaJ. Sangha	42	23	-5.1—	112.6—	117.6—	50.0%—	26.9%—	9.6%—	25.0%—	54.9%—	64.0%—	16.8%—	39.0%—
GodfreyD. Godfreyvan der PlasE. van der PlasMcMillan IVP. McMillan IVKopaT. KopaThompsonG. Thompson	42	20	13.8—	125.0—	111.3—	62.5%—	16.7%—	12.0%—	50.0%—	48.6%—	52.4%—	18.5%—	27.8%—
BenardA. BenardMcMillan IVP. McMillan IVKopaT. KopaThompsonG. ThompsonSanghaJ. Sangha	35	17	-108.9—	71.8—	180.7—	40.9%—	26.7%—	37.4%—	36.4%—	78.4%—	46.2%—	5.7%—	16.2%—
GodfreyD. GodfreyBenardA. BenardKopaT. KopaThompsonG. ThompsonPalesseC. Palesse	32	15	-1.0—	114.6—	115.6—	55.6%—	23.5%—	15.5%—	33.3%—	56.8%—	81.8%—	12.8%—	68.2%—
GodfreyD. Godfreyvan der PlasE. van der PlasMcMillan IVP. McMillan IVKopaT. KopaSanghaJ. Sangha	30	16	-37.5—	121.8—	159.3—	60.7%—	30.8%—	13.2%—	17.9%—	75.0%—	64.3%—	9.8%—	35.7%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.