Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Charleston Southern logoCharleston Southern logoCharleston Southern logoCharleston Southern logo

Charleston Southern12-17

Big SouthCoach: Saah Nimley

12-17NET#222

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
A'lahn Sumler+8.482+6.282−2.262+3.484−4.316−3.290+13.698+0.148+4.490+0.764+11.56
Jesse Hafemeister−3.736+4.676+8.310+1.364−3.124−2.484−0.946+5.66+2.172−3.38−9.190
Brycen Blaine+2.260−3.732−5.980−3.320+1.970−0.150−0.252−1.868+3.182+1.270−1.558
Jacob Taylor−4.134+1.358+5.420+2.476+4.186+3.010−4.826+2.622−2.724+0.256−3.068
Nate Brafford+7.578+0.956−6.684+3.384+1.870+3.010−1.046−4.890+1.364+0.560+3.630
Reis Jones−4.534+1.258+5.818−0.742−1.042−2.584−1.840+0.938−3.420−0.738+3.828
Luke Williams+4.970+6.182+1.242−1.238−3.124−6.998−0.848−3.078−2.626−1.922+6.716
Lase Olalere+11.790+4.074−7.786+4.590+1.566+1.822−6.618−2.978+1.062+2.184−2.564
Armari Carraway−12.812−10.510+2.236−3.718−2.034+3.86−2.140+1.532−4.116+0.458−8.388
Jaquias Franklin−2.542−5.622−3.166−2.326+0.456+0.540−2.238−1.970−2.526+1.068−1.560
Trent Coleman−7.124−4.128+3.032−2.228−1.140+1.722+8.088+5.56+4.590+1.374+4.126
Devin Brafford−10.716−7.916+2.932−7.24+7.598+3.96+8.690+1.830+0.150−2.218−11.294

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
A'lahn Sumler2.550109.246106.75254.9%6228.0%4217.6%3634.4%5446.8%7071.1%5412.9%2647.4%16
Jesse Hafemeister-1.242108.946110.14454.3%5828.2%4417.7%3430.0%4248.5%6270.5%5211.6%2040.9%28
Brycen Blaine1.048105.738104.65652.3%5030.2%5218.4%3030.2%4245.9%7271.2%5413.3%2843.2%24
Jacob Taylor-2.142108.144110.14455.1%6231.5%5620.0%2027.8%3648.0%6468.4%4212.8%2642.3%24
Nate Brafford3.952107.942104.05855.6%6630.3%5220.1%2029.7%4044.2%8070.5%5212.9%2645.7%18
Reis Jones-2.442108.144110.54253.5%5628.8%4617.2%3829.3%4047.2%6868.0%4012.3%2445.8%18
Luke Williams2.950110.950108.04853.2%5427.6%4014.6%6029.8%4045.0%7668.3%4211.7%2047.6%16
Lase Olalere7.258109.948102.76256.6%7030.3%5219.6%2226.3%3044.9%7670.4%5214.0%3442.3%26
Armari Carraway-9.03099.926109.04651.2%4428.0%4221.2%1628.8%3847.7%6666.9%3813.0%2838.0%34
Jaquias Franklin-1.842103.332105.05652.2%5029.6%5018.9%2828.7%3845.3%7667.9%4013.5%3042.7%24
Trent Coleman-5.736104.134109.84452.1%5028.4%4419.9%2236.8%5851.2%5073.5%6613.8%3247.2%18
Devin Brafford-9.730100.326110.04447.3%2836.1%7422.0%1238.1%6248.3%6269.8%4810.7%1633.7%44

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
A'lahn Sumler-5.936103.032108.94651.5%4632.3%6020.8%1620.8%1846.6%7066.7%3212.2%2235.9%40
Jesse Hafemeister2.550104.434101.96453.0%5231.4%5620.1%2030.9%4442.9%8468.4%4214.9%4050.0%14
Brycen Blaine-1.144109.448110.54255.7%6628.3%4418.6%3030.4%4247.7%6668.1%4012.1%2244.6%20
Jacob Taylor2.148106.840104.75652.7%5227.4%4017.1%4032.6%4845.4%7471.1%5412.6%2445.3%20
Nate Brafford-3.640107.040110.64252.3%5028.5%4417.1%4030.7%4449.0%6069.1%4612.5%2442.1%26
Reis Jones2.150106.840104.75654.2%5829.8%5019.7%2231.1%4446.3%7271.4%5613.1%2842.1%26
Luke Williams-2.142104.836106.85254.4%6030.8%5221.5%1430.6%4248.0%6471.0%5413.5%3040.9%28
Lase Olalere-4.538105.838110.44252.1%5028.8%4617.8%3432.8%4847.8%6669.4%4611.9%2044.8%20
Armari Carraway3.752110.550106.75254.9%6229.9%5017.4%3630.9%4446.3%7270.9%5412.6%2446.2%18
Jaquias Franklin0.746108.846108.24854.4%6029.3%4818.4%3030.8%4447.2%6870.4%5212.5%2444.2%22
Trent Coleman1.448108.244106.85254.3%5829.6%4818.2%3228.7%3845.7%7469.0%4412.5%2443.1%24
Devin Brafford1.148108.244107.15054.5%6028.6%4618.1%3229.5%4046.5%7069.8%4812.9%2644.9%20
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.