Cornell16-11

IvyCoach: Jon Jaques

16-11NET#108

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cooper Noard	1,363	541	71.6%	+13.092	+9.292	−3.770	+3.182	−0.546	−2.078	−2.438	−3.180	+1.262	−1.724	−12.796
Nazir Williams	1,318	586	69.2%	+2.862	+11.496	+8.510	+5.194	+5.492	−0.050	−1.544	+3.218	−0.348	−2.316	−8.890
Jake Fiegen	1,246	658	65.5%	+4.568	+9.892	+5.322	+6.898	+2.170	+1.428	+2.768	−0.960	−1.734	−2.416	+9.78
AK Okereke	1,245	659	65.4%	+12.690	+20.6100	+8.012	+10.6100	+1.868	−1.976	+3.170	+5.26	+0.152	+0.356	−1.358
Guy Ragland Jr.	1,137	767	59.7%	+12.890	+16.8100	+4.028	+10.0100	+1.464	+0.048	+4.576	+2.226	+3.784	−1.822	−0.552
Jacob Beccles	817	1,087	42.9%	−11.616	−10.68	+1.044	−6.08	+0.354	+1.034	−1.444	−0.250	−5.110	+0.762	+4.326
Ryan Kiachian	569	1,335	29.9%	−13.910	−16.44	−2.664	−8.14	−0.150	+2.218	−6.518	−1.262	−4.016	+1.982	−3.468
Adam Hinton	538	1,366	28.3%	+1.556	−2.636	−4.272	+0.454	−4.018	−0.252	+2.768	−1.464	+1.868	+0.560	−1.458
DJ Nix	536	1,368	28.2%	−14.710	−16.74	−2.060	−11.82	−1.142	−1.268	−3.432	−0.556	−0.844	+1.980	+0.844
Anthony Nimani	267	1,637	14.0%	+4.468	−2.736	−7.184	+0.858	−5.610	+0.246	+1.058	+0.246	+5.292	+1.474	−4.674
Chris Cain	176	1,728	9.2%	−5.730	−18.02	−12.494	−7.84	−6.96	−1.572	−9.110	−3.986	+6.896	+0.864	+3.132
Gioacchino Panzini	114	1,790	6.0%	−14.610	−21.92	−7.384	−12.92	−1.934	−1.978	−6.518	−2.374	+6.696	−1.724	+20.50

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cooper Noard	1,363	541	71.6%	10.664	119.774	109.244	59.6%84	26.6%32	16.1%54	27.7%42	51.3%48	70.0%54	15.0%34	27.7%54
Nazir Williams	1,318	586	69.2%	7.760	120.676	113.034	60.3%86	28.5%40	16.7%48	27.9%44	53.2%38	69.6%52	14.8%34	28.5%52
Jake Fiegen	1,246	658	65.5%	8.462	120.576	112.136	61.1%88	27.5%36	17.2%46	29.3%48	51.9%44	69.1%50	14.7%32	34.5%36
AK Okereke	1,245	659	65.4%	11.266	124.282	113.134	62.4%90	27.4%36	16.1%54	29.4%48	54.1%34	69.7%54	15.6%40	30.7%46
Guy Ragland Jr.	1,137	767	59.7%	12.068	123.982	111.838	62.8%90	27.3%36	16.7%48	30.2%50	53.1%38	71.2%60	14.8%34	31.0%44
Jacob Beccles	817	1,087	42.9%	0.246	111.154	110.840	55.3%68	26.9%34	17.3%44	27.6%42	52.1%42	66.7%42	15.9%42	33.7%38
Ryan Kiachian	569	1,335	29.9%	-2.942	105.640	108.546	53.1%58	26.7%32	18.3%38	23.9%30	51.4%46	66.9%42	16.9%48	28.8%52
Adam Hinton	538	1,366	28.3%	7.960	115.264	107.350	59.0%82	23.9%24	16.5%50	30.3%50	51.2%48	70.9%60	15.9%40	30.1%46
DJ Nix	536	1,368	28.2%	-3.740	105.140	108.844	50.3%46	26.0%30	15.8%56	26.0%38	51.8%44	69.1%50	16.9%48	31.8%42
Anthony Nimani	267	1,637	14.0%	10.664	114.864	104.256	59.4%84	22.0%18	16.8%48	29.2%48	52.3%42	74.1%74	16.7%46	27.2%56
Chris Cain	176	1,728	9.2%	1.750	100.730	99.070	51.6%50	20.6%16	15.4%60	20.1%22	48.6%58	75.9%80	16.2%44	34.0%36
Gioacchino Panzini	114	1,790	6.0%	-6.934	96.622	103.458	46.6%28	25.0%26	14.9%62	22.3%26	50.0%54	75.9%80	14.0%28	50.5%10

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cooper Noard	1,363	541	71.6%	-2.442	110.552	112.934	56.5%72	27.1%34	18.1%38	30.1%50	54.4%32	68.8%50	16.7%46	40.3%22
Nazir Williams	1,318	586	69.2%	4.856	109.250	104.456	55.1%66	23.1%20	16.7%48	29.4%48	50.0%54	69.9%54	17.1%50	37.3%28
Jake Fiegen	1,246	658	65.5%	3.954	110.754	106.850	54.3%64	25.4%28	15.8%56	26.6%40	52.8%40	70.8%58	17.1%50	24.8%64
AK Okereke	1,245	659	65.4%	-1.444	103.736	105.154	51.8%52	25.6%30	17.9%40	26.4%38	48.8%58	69.6%54	15.3%36	32.0%42
Guy Ragland Jr.	1,137	767	59.7%	-0.846	107.144	107.848	52.8%56	26.0%30	16.7%48	25.8%36	50.9%50	67.4%42	16.6%46	31.5%42
Jacob Beccles	817	1,087	42.9%	11.866	121.778	109.842	61.3%88	26.6%32	16.3%52	29.0%46	52.3%42	71.9%64	15.2%36	29.3%50
Ryan Kiachian	569	1,335	29.9%	11.066	122.078	111.040	61.1%88	26.7%34	16.0%54	30.3%50	52.5%40	70.9%60	14.9%34	32.2%42
Adam Hinton	538	1,366	28.3%	6.458	117.970	111.438	58.6%80	27.9%38	16.8%48	27.6%42	52.6%40	69.2%50	15.4%38	31.6%42
DJ Nix	536	1,368	28.2%	11.066	121.878	110.840	62.1%90	27.1%34	17.0%46	29.4%48	52.3%42	69.9%54	15.0%34	31.0%44
Anthony Nimani	267	1,637	14.0%	6.258	117.570	111.338	58.6%80	27.5%36	16.7%48	28.3%44	52.2%42	68.9%50	15.3%36	31.8%42
Chris Cain	176	1,728	9.2%	7.460	118.872	111.438	59.5%84	27.5%36	16.8%48	29.3%48	52.5%40	69.1%50	15.4%38	30.9%44
Gioacchino Panzini	114	1,790	6.0%	7.760	118.472	110.740	59.5%84	26.9%34	16.8%48	28.8%46	52.3%42	69.3%52	15.6%40	30.0%46

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.