East Tennessee St.17-13

SouthernCoach: Brooks Savage

17-13NET#134

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Quimari Peterson	1,603	212	88.3%	+21.8100	+8.088	−13.796	+2.274	+5.090	−0.862	+0.052	−3.584	+8.4100	+1.272	+1.442
Karon Boyd	1,358	458	74.8%	+5.874	+2.564	−3.468	−4.412	+4.788	−3.188	+2.064	−2.676	+1.668	−3.96	−18.998
Jaden Seymour	1,296	520	71.4%	−6.328	−0.250	+6.118	−0.842	+3.784	+1.822	+3.370	+0.248	+0.960	−3.68	+7.314
John Buggs III	1,144	672	63.0%	−4.934	+1.458	+6.318	−2.922	−0.448	−3.390	−0.648	+2.226	−4.116	+0.256	+8.210
Allen Strothers	843	973	46.4%	−2.042	+3.168	+5.222	+5.494	−2.132	+2.516	+6.484	+2.424	+4.690	−1.624	+13.54
Maki Johnson	774	1,041	42.6%	+3.866	−3.034	−6.782	−3.518	−0.446	−1.674	−0.450	−3.886	−3.420	+3.090	−0.552
DJ Hughes	671	1,144	37.0%	+1.858	−2.238	−4.072	−1.238	+2.372	−0.556	−9.010	−0.958	+6.596	−1.822	−8.688
Gabe Sisk	533	1,283	29.3%	+4.970	−0.448	−5.376	+1.062	−2.034	+1.428	+12.596	−0.960	−0.448	+1.980	−5.678
Davion Bradford	380	1,436	20.9%	−10.918	+1.460	+12.44	+5.394	−3.224	+2.218	−2.736	+5.18	−10.92	+1.980	−4.876
Roosevelt Wheeler	308	1,508	17.0%	−0.748	−2.638	−1.960	+1.770	−2.430	+2.218	−8.710	−0.454	−3.222	+2.688	−0.250
Curt Lewis	128	1,688	7.1%	−10.018	−1.542	+8.512	+5.796	−5.510	+2.218	−8.012	+10.70	+4.186	+3.392	+0.348

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Quimari Peterson	1,603	212	88.3%	9.564	115.464	105.852	50.6%46	40.4%82	16.6%50	33.6%60	50.1%50	66.1%38	19.6%68	35.4%34
Karon Boyd	1,358	458	74.8%	8.462	115.164	106.650	49.3%38	40.9%84	15.9%56	34.0%60	50.0%54	65.5%36	18.5%60	31.1%44
Jaden Seymour	1,296	520	71.4%	5.156	114.462	109.344	50.1%46	40.9%84	17.2%44	34.5%62	50.6%50	65.4%36	18.3%60	37.4%28
John Buggs III	1,144	672	63.0%	5.256	115.064	109.842	49.3%38	39.7%80	15.5%58	33.3%60	51.4%46	63.7%30	19.5%66	38.4%26
Allen Strothers	843	973	46.4%	5.958	116.166	110.242	53.4%60	38.6%78	18.0%40	37.1%68	51.9%44	67.8%44	18.5%60	42.8%20
Maki Johnson	774	1,041	42.6%	9.162	112.758	103.658	48.4%34	39.6%80	15.8%56	33.3%60	48.4%60	63.2%28	21.1%76	35.0%34
DJ Hughes	671	1,144	37.0%	8.162	113.060	104.954	49.6%40	41.3%86	16.4%52	28.0%44	50.0%54	69.3%52	18.3%58	29.9%48
Gabe Sisk	533	1,283	29.3%	10.464	114.262	103.758	51.1%48	38.4%76	17.7%42	42.6%78	49.9%54	64.9%34	20.7%74	31.3%44
Davion Bradford	380	1,436	20.9%	-1.744	115.666	117.226	54.5%64	37.3%74	18.4%36	31.4%54	54.6%32	56.4%10	20.9%76	31.5%42
Roosevelt Wheeler	308	1,508	17.0%	6.458	112.358	105.952	51.8%52	37.8%76	18.5%36	26.3%38	50.2%50	62.5%24	21.6%78	35.1%34
Curt Lewis	128	1,688	7.1%	-2.244	113.060	115.330	55.7%70	34.7%66	18.7%34	26.1%38	60.6%12	69.0%50	22.5%82	35.6%32

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Quimari Peterson	1,603	212	88.3%	-12.328	107.346	119.622	48.4%34	35.4%68	17.4%44	33.5%60	53.6%36	57.7%12	18.4%60	34.0%36
Karon Boyd	1,358	458	74.8%	2.652	112.658	110.042	53.7%62	36.2%70	19.0%32	32.0%56	52.6%40	63.9%30	22.4%82	50.0%12
Jaden Seymour	1,296	520	71.4%	11.466	114.662	103.260	50.9%46	37.2%74	15.4%60	31.2%54	50.4%50	64.5%32	22.0%80	30.1%46
John Buggs III	1,144	672	63.0%	10.164	113.660	103.558	52.2%54	40.1%82	18.8%34	33.9%60	49.1%56	67.7%44	19.3%66	30.1%46
Allen Strothers	843	973	46.4%	7.960	113.060	105.054	48.0%32	40.8%84	15.5%58	30.7%52	49.5%56	63.1%26	20.2%72	29.2%50
Maki Johnson	774	1,041	42.6%	5.456	115.766	110.342	51.9%52	40.0%82	17.4%44	33.7%60	52.2%42	66.6%38	18.1%58	35.5%34
DJ Hughes	671	1,144	37.0%	6.358	115.364	109.044	50.8%46	39.0%78	16.9%48	37.0%68	50.9%50	62.7%26	20.1%70	38.5%26
Gabe Sisk	533	1,283	29.3%	5.556	114.562	109.044	50.1%46	40.4%82	16.3%52	30.1%50	50.8%50	65.3%36	18.9%62	36.9%30
Davion Bradford	380	1,436	20.9%	9.262	114.162	104.954	49.3%38	40.5%82	16.2%52	34.1%62	49.4%56	67.3%42	19.0%64	36.3%30
Roosevelt Wheeler	308	1,508	17.0%	7.160	114.964	107.848	50.1%46	40.2%82	16.3%52	35.0%64	50.6%50	65.7%36	19.0%64	35.3%34
Curt Lewis	128	1,688	7.1%	7.760	114.562	106.850	50.0%40	40.2%82	16.5%50	34.1%62	49.8%54	64.9%34	19.2%64	35.2%34

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

East Tennessee St.ETSU17-13

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

East Tennessee St.17-13