Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Eastern Washington logoEastern Washington logoEastern Washington logoEastern Washington logo

Eastern Wash.13-19

Big SkyCoach: Dan Monson

13-19NET#205

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Isaiah Moses+6.074+3.670−2.462+2.678+2.272+0.638−9.510−1.566+4.590−2.316−6.482
Alton Hamilton IV+12.190+5.982−6.282+2.374+5.692−0.252−1.542−4.288−2.228+0.764−8.888
Kiree Huie−4.134−8.414−4.372−1.436−2.728+2.216−6.120−1.868+3.282−0.836−6.180
Jojo Anderson+0.854+4.072+3.132+0.556−1.438−1.674+17.7100−2.878−7.94−0.542+3.928
Straton Rogers−11.614−6.120+5.520−4.812+0.658−0.152+4.174+2.722+2.172−0.150+9.78
Johnny Radford+7.378+0.654−6.684−0.742−2.132−0.760+10.094+0.346+2.878+4.196+10.28
Tyler Powell+2.560+3.068+0.546+1.870+1.970+0.442−7.016−2.474−5.510−1.724−11.094
Emmett Marquardt−3.836+1.760+5.520−0.544+0.052−1.572−4.626+5.18+2.576+1.068−0.956
Elijah Thomas−6.626−1.144+5.520−0.248+0.556+0.736+2.264+2.524−0.940−1.722+3.928
Cole Scherer+3.966+3.268−0.754+4.288−2.528−0.556−18.02+2.424+5.292−0.050−5.076
Shaumba Ngoyi−13.810−16.82−3.066−7.14−1.338+2.910−3.830+1.236+0.252+1.474+7.514

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Isaiah Moses-1.342113.458114.73254.9%6232.6%6017.6%3635.0%5454.7%3470.0%4815.9%4837.2%36
Alton Hamilton IV1.348114.660113.23655.1%6233.8%6617.4%3636.2%5853.7%3868.6%4416.6%5435.8%40
Kiree Huie-3.840109.748113.53653.9%5831.2%5418.3%3234.3%5254.3%3470.4%5216.0%5036.1%38
Jojo Anderson-1.942114.660116.52854.7%6231.6%5616.7%4245.1%7653.7%3865.7%3216.1%5040.1%28
Straton Rogers-7.832109.948117.62652.1%5032.5%6017.4%3638.6%6256.2%2870.2%5016.3%5043.0%24
Johnny Radford1.548113.156111.64054.1%5831.1%5417.1%3841.8%7055.1%3270.7%5218.5%6844.1%22
Tyler Powell-0.944114.660115.43055.5%6433.3%6617.7%3432.6%4853.6%3866.1%3215.3%4432.2%48
Emmett Marquardt-4.738113.958118.62454.1%5832.2%6016.5%4433.7%5258.2%2070.9%5417.0%5637.8%34
Elijah Thomas-7.334112.054119.32454.3%5832.6%6018.0%3238.3%6256.8%2668.5%4215.0%4241.3%26
Cole Scherer0.948115.462114.53257.8%7430.2%5217.1%3822.0%2056.9%2473.5%6616.3%5234.2%44
Shaumba Ngoyi-15.22297.120112.33847.8%3031.0%5420.1%2033.0%5056.0%2869.4%4617.6%6245.4%20

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Isaiah Moses-7.334109.848117.12852.3%5030.4%5217.0%4044.6%7456.2%2865.5%3018.2%6443.7%22
Alton Hamilton IV-10.828108.744119.52252.8%5228.3%4417.6%3637.7%6057.9%2270.8%5215.8%4844.6%20
Kiree Huie0.346118.168117.82655.3%6433.9%6616.1%4840.4%6656.0%2867.1%3816.8%5642.2%26
Jojo Anderson-2.740110.750113.43654.1%5833.0%6218.3%3027.4%3456.5%2673.6%6616.6%5436.2%38
Straton Rogers3.952116.064112.13857.0%7231.9%5817.5%3634.5%5453.5%3868.1%4016.4%5233.3%44
Johnny Radford-5.736112.554118.22654.8%6233.2%6217.8%3431.8%4654.8%3267.9%4014.4%3633.9%44
Tyler Powell-3.340111.652114.93253.7%5631.4%5617.3%3839.6%6456.0%2871.6%5817.0%5643.2%24
Emmett Marquardt-0.944112.254113.13654.6%6032.2%6018.0%3238.2%6253.1%4068.4%4216.0%4838.7%32
Elijah Thomas-0.744113.156113.83454.5%6032.1%6017.3%3836.1%5854.3%3469.4%4616.8%5437.4%36
Cole Scherer-3.040112.254115.23253.6%5632.7%6017.6%3640.0%6654.5%3468.3%4216.3%5239.3%32
Shaumba Ngoyi-1.442113.958115.33054.9%6232.3%6017.3%3836.8%5854.8%3269.2%4616.2%5037.9%34
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.