Fordham11-21

A10Coach: Keith Urgo

11-21NET#246

Poss2,256

Net Rtg-7.934

ORtg104.038

DRtg111.936

Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,256	1,058	-7.934	104.038	111.936	48.6%36	32.7%58	18.5%36	32.8%58	52.9%38	67.9%44	16.8%48	39.1%24
DeanR. DeanMedorJ. MedorJohnson IIIJ. Johnson IIITsimbilaA. TsimbilaTrippJ. Tripp	238	123	2.352	110.954	108.646	52.9%58	37.7%76	19.7%28	27.5%42	52.0%44	71.8%64	14.5%32	34.7%36
DeanR. DeanZonaM. ZonaMedorJ. MedorJohnson IIIJ. Johnson IIIRiveraJ. Rivera	154	66	5.356	115.666	110.242	52.4%54	31.7%54	11.7%84	28.0%44	47.5%64	59.1%16	18.8%62	54.5%8
DeanR. DeanMedorJ. MedorJohnson IIIJ. Johnson IIITsimbilaA. TsimbilaRileyZ. Riley	144	78	-15.722	87.410	103.160	44.8%22	25.6%30	22.2%16	12.0%6	45.4%74	63.0%26	18.5%60	37.7%28
DeanR. DeanMedorJ. MedorJohnson IIIJ. Johnson IIIRiveraJ. RiveraTsimbilaA. Tsimbila	128	64	-26.212	91.414	117.524	41.0%12	37.0%74	25.0%8	36.2%66	51.2%48	62.2%24	13.4%24	34.7%36
ZonaM. ZonaMedorJ. MedorJohnson IIIJ. Johnson IIIRiveraJ. RiveraTrippJ. Tripp	85	37	20.580	121.278	100.766	57.9%78	40.5%82	18.8%34	27.6%42	43.1%82	79.2%88	11.7%16	66.2%4
DeanR. DeanZonaM. ZonaMedorJ. MedorJohnson IIIJ. Johnson IIITrippJ. Tripp	78	36	15.172	126.286	111.040	54.9%66	28.2%40	11.5%84	67.2%96	56.8%22	70.0%54	19.8%68	21.2%74
ZonaM. ZonaMedorJ. MedorRiveraJ. RiveraRileyZ. RileyTrippJ. Tripp	75	34	22.282	111.956	89.784	48.6%36	38.1%76	13.3%74	23.3%28	47.5%64	81.1%92	20.1%70	19.7%78
MedorJ. MedorJohnson IIIJ. Johnson IIIRiveraJ. RiveraTsimbilaA. TsimbilaRileyZ. Riley	69	32	5.656	118.070	112.436	53.8%62	31.6%52	13.1%76	21.5%24	59.6%14	75.0%76	19.0%64	25.0%64
ZonaM. ZonaMedorJ. MedorJohnson IIIJ. Johnson IIIRiveraJ. RiveraRileyZ. Riley	59	28	13.970	113.862	99.968	53.2%58	21.9%18	11.9%82	53.2%90	43.5%80	61.1%20	18.3%60	35.2%34
MedorJ. MedorJohnson IIIJ. Johnson IIIRiveraJ. RiveraTsimbilaA. TsimbilaTrippJ. Tripp	59	26	-8.432	105.942	114.332	46.3%26	31.4%52	12.0%82	33.3%60	64.5%6	78.9%88	19.4%66	42.1%20
DeanR. DeanZonaM. ZonaMedorJ. MedorJohnson IIIJ. Johnson IIIRileyZ. Riley	54	27	-9.530	113.060	122.616	50.0%40	33.3%62	18.5%36	46.7%84	62.5%8	82.6%94	8.2%6	4.2%98
DeanR. DeanMedorJ. MedorJohnson IIIJ. Johnson IIIRiveraJ. RiveraTrippJ. Tripp	53	26	-20.418	106.042	126.412	44.6%20	42.4%88	15.1%62	58.7%94	54.0%34	64.3%30	12.8%22	32.0%42
DeanR. DeanZonaM. ZonaMedorJ. MedorRichardsonW. RichardsonJohnson IIIJ. Johnson III	52	27	-3.042	83.08	86.190	40.9%12	16.7%8	17.4%44	18.2%16	40.4%88	66.7%38	15.3%36	17.3%84
DeanR. DeanMedorJ. MedorRichardsonW. RichardsonJohnson IIIJ. Johnson IIITsimbilaA. Tsimbila	45	23	16.574	126.986	110.540	75.0%100	40.0%80	29.0%2	11.1%6	47.4%64	55.6%10	19.2%64	35.9%32
MedorJ. MedorRichardsonW. RichardsonRiveraJ. RiveraTsimbilaA. TsimbilaRileyZ. Riley	41	20	-48.24	78.76	126.912	31.9%2	40.0%80	24.6%8	38.9%72	59.0%16	65.2%34	14.4%30	25.6%62
DeanR. DeanZonaM. ZonaMedorJ. MedorRiveraJ. RiveraRileyZ. Riley	32	14	-13.726	107.646	121.318	44.4%20	40.0%80	15.8%56	59.3%94	56.9%22	68.8%48	12.8%20	24.1%66

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25 (4,899 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.