High Point25-9

Big SouthCoach: Alan Huss

25-9NET#105

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kimani Hamilton	1,577	424	78.8%	+10.684	+2.464	−8.286	−0.150	+4.284	−1.064	−7.018	−4.186	−4.016	+2.080	−14.696
Kezza Giffa	1,499	503	74.9%	+1.958	+8.888	+6.916	−1.536	+5.992	−0.860	+22.2100	−1.262	−7.54	+1.472	+14.42
Duke Miles	1,441	560	72.0%	+14.492	+6.582	−7.984	+3.786	+1.060	−1.976	−0.548	−4.688	+0.152	+0.864	+0.744
Abdoulaye Thiam	1,399	602	69.9%	−6.328	−4.528	+1.840	+2.374	−7.16	+1.230	−3.034	+4.212	+3.078	+0.964	−6.080
Trae Benham	1,395	606	69.7%	−4.634	+0.754	+5.322	+0.960	+1.666	−1.064	−13.34	+1.830	−0.744	−2.516	−8.186
Juslin Bodo Bodo	1,242	760	62.0%	+11.686	+2.464	−9.288	+3.986	+5.288	+3.210	−10.98	−5.290	−1.140	+1.270	−19.498
Titas Sargiunas	526	1,476	26.3%	−3.338	−1.742	+1.740	+0.254	−3.820	+0.344	+5.380	+4.114	+5.994	−0.740	+8.012
Pavlo Dziuba	319	1,682	15.9%	−11.216	−6.022	+5.222	−4.114	−7.46	−2.682	−0.152	+1.732	+2.474	−3.88	+7.514
Cade Potter	319	1,683	15.9%	−4.036	−1.842	+2.238	−1.338	−0.548	−1.874	−6.618	+6.24	+1.768	+3.994	+7.116
Denzel Hines	191	1,810	9.6%	−14.510	−2.836	+11.76	−6.06	−0.746	+1.428	+26.2100	−1.060	−0.942	−6.72	+31.20

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kimani Hamilton	1,577	424	78.8%	13.870	122.180	108.346	52.6%58	41.3%86	15.7%54	40.5%74	49.2%56	70.0%54	14.3%32	32.6%38
Kezza Giffa	1,499	503	74.9%	12.068	123.882	111.836	52.2%56	41.9%88	15.7%54	47.7%86	49.7%54	69.0%50	14.2%32	39.2%22
Duke Miles	1,441	560	72.0%	15.672	123.482	107.946	53.6%62	40.7%84	15.4%58	41.8%76	48.7%58	70.9%58	14.1%30	35.7%30
Abdoulaye Thiam	1,399	602	69.9%	9.764	120.376	110.640	53.3%60	38.1%78	16.3%50	41.0%76	51.3%46	71.8%64	14.1%30	33.7%34
Trae Benham	1,395	606	69.7%	10.164	121.878	111.736	52.9%58	40.9%86	15.6%56	38.1%70	50.5%48	70.6%58	13.1%24	33.1%36
Juslin Bodo Bodo	1,242	760	62.0%	16.072	122.580	106.550	54.1%64	42.4%88	17.2%44	37.8%70	48.1%60	70.4%56	14.3%32	28.5%50
Titas Sargiunas	526	1,476	26.3%	9.162	120.476	111.338	52.8%58	37.6%78	16.2%52	45.9%84	53.1%36	75.3%78	13.4%26	41.5%20
Pavlo Dziuba	319	1,682	15.9%	2.250	116.670	114.430	49.1%40	34.2%64	13.8%70	41.8%78	51.4%44	72.9%68	10.7%14	41.9%18
Cade Potter	319	1,683	15.9%	8.260	120.176	111.936	51.5%52	40.0%82	14.4%64	36.4%66	55.3%26	72.3%66	17.1%52	41.6%20
Denzel Hines	191	1,810	9.6%	-1.644	119.174	120.718	47.1%32	39.8%82	17.2%44	65.8%96	49.1%56	70.0%54	7.8%6	63.8%4

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kimani Hamilton	1,577	424	78.8%	3.252	119.776	116.526	52.7%58	37.1%74	16.7%48	47.5%84	53.3%36	74.0%72	12.3%20	47.2%12
Kezza Giffa	1,499	503	74.9%	10.164	115.064	104.954	53.7%62	36.0%72	16.5%50	25.4%36	50.9%46	76.4%80	12.9%24	24.8%62
Duke Miles	1,441	560	72.0%	1.148	116.970	115.828	49.9%42	39.7%82	17.3%44	42.2%78	53.3%36	70.8%58	13.3%26	35.1%32
Abdoulaye Thiam	1,399	602	69.9%	16.072	124.884	108.844	51.0%50	45.2%94	15.1%60	44.0%80	47.1%64	68.8%50	13.3%26	39.7%22
Trae Benham	1,395	606	69.7%	14.872	121.178	106.450	52.0%54	39.3%82	16.7%48	51.4%88	48.7%58	71.3%60	15.6%40	41.3%20
Juslin Bodo Bodo	1,242	760	62.0%	4.454	120.176	115.828	50.2%46	37.3%76	13.9%68	48.7%86	53.3%36	71.6%62	13.1%24	47.9%12
Titas Sargiunas	526	1,476	26.3%	12.468	122.180	109.642	52.5%58	41.4%86	15.9%54	40.5%74	49.0%56	69.4%52	14.1%30	33.5%34
Pavlo Dziuba	319	1,682	15.9%	13.370	122.680	109.244	53.3%60	41.7%88	16.3%50	41.9%78	49.7%54	70.5%56	14.5%32	34.3%34
Cade Potter	319	1,683	15.9%	12.268	121.978	109.742	52.8%58	40.5%84	16.2%52	43.0%80	49.1%56	70.6%58	13.3%26	34.5%32
Denzel Hines	191	1,810	9.6%	13.068	121.978	108.944	53.1%60	40.5%84	15.8%54	39.6%72	50.1%50	70.9%58	14.5%32	32.6%38

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.