Poss1,734
Net Rtg-16.222
ORtg102.234
DRtg118.422
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 1,734 | 885 | -16.222 | 102.234 | 118.422 | 51.0%48 | 25.9%30 | 17.1%44 | 25.9%38 | 53.6%34 | 67.9%44 | 13.1%24 | 30.5%44 |
| OctaveJ. OctaveMontgomeryB. MontgomeryNugentJ. NugentKenneyC. KenneyBatchelderW. Batchelder | 276 | 143 | -11.828 | 107.646 | 119.422 | 54.2%64 | 26.5%32 | 17.0%46 | 23.9%32 | 53.8%34 | 69.9%54 | 12.7%22 | 32.9%38 |
| OctaveJ. OctaveNugentJ. NugentKenneyC. KenneyWilliamsD. WilliamsBatchelderW. Batchelder | 187 | 99 | -10.530 | 101.532 | 112.036 | 52.9%58 | 19.4%12 | 17.6%42 | 21.8%26 | 50.0%54 | 66.0%36 | 14.8%36 | 27.0%56 |
| MontgomeryB. MontgomeryNugentJ. NugentKenneyC. KenneyWilliamsD. WilliamsBatchelderW. Batchelder | 132 | 67 | 3.754 | 94.920 | 91.182 | 50.5%48 | 23.6%22 | 19.7%28 | 26.6%40 | 43.2%80 | 78.4%86 | 13.7%28 | 28.2%52 |
| OctaveJ. OctaveMontgomeryB. MontgomeryKenneyC. KenneyWilliamsD. WilliamsBatchelderW. Batchelder | 78 | 37 | -35.28 | 95.422 | 130.68 | 52.4%56 | 28.9%42 | 23.2%12 | 29.0%48 | 62.8%8 | 71.8%64 | 11.3%16 | 21.6%72 |
| OctaveJ. OctaveCoulibalyL. CoulibalyMontgomeryB. MontgomeryNugentJ. NugentBatchelderW. Batchelder | 47 | 28 | -23.116 | 99.228 | 122.316 | 44.1%20 | 45.5%94 | 19.0%32 | 9.8%4 | 54.7%30 | 64.5%32 | 10.0%10 | 11.3%94 |
| OctaveJ. OctaveCoulibalyL. CoulibalyNugentJ. NugentWilliamsD. WilliamsBatchelderW. Batchelder | 38 | 20 | -30.510 | 95.522 | 125.912 | 42.6%16 | 43.5%90 | 21.2%20 | 35.3%64 | 50.0%54 | 47.6%2 | 17.6%54 | 31.6%42 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2023-24 (4,483 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.