Idaho9-21

Big SkyCoach: Alex Pribble

9-21NET#321

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Quinn Denker	1,651	277	85.6%	−15.010	−6.520	+8.512	−0.446	−5.014	+0.244	−12.94	+1.830	−3.222	−4.64	−3.166
Julius Mims	1,363	565	70.7%	+3.264	−0.746	−3.970	+3.182	−4.616	+0.344	−9.110	+0.050	+7.798	−2.218	+0.546
D'Angelo Minnis	1,176	751	61.0%	−3.240	+1.156	+4.326	+0.960	−2.530	−2.582	−4.228	+1.534	−0.644	−0.838	−3.870
Trevon Blassingame	966	962	50.1%	−3.040	−2.538	+0.546	+1.870	−3.720	+1.626	−9.110	+1.038	+2.574	−1.330	+3.630
Kyson Rose	952	976	49.4%	−12.614	−4.726	+7.814	+0.050	−0.648	+2.912	−7.714	+1.434	−1.538	−2.814	−5.176
Terren Frank	838	1,090	43.5%	+2.460	+0.654	−1.958	+0.354	+1.564	+0.638	−0.152	+0.840	+0.556	+1.472	−4.272
EJ Neal Jr.	795	1,132	41.3%	+2.660	+2.564	−0.250	−0.744	+5.188	+0.540	+9.392	−0.152	−2.428	+1.066	+1.042
Kristian Gonzalez	663	1,265	34.4%	+6.474	+4.674	−1.858	+4.892	−2.132	+1.132	+4.376	+1.434	+0.556	+1.878	−1.758
Tyler Linhardt	607	1,320	31.5%	+0.954	+4.574	+3.630	−0.150	−1.834	−4.796	+1.058	−0.454	−0.150	−0.642	+9.68
Titus Yearout	293	1,634	15.2%	+6.574	−2.836	−9.288	−9.12	+11.4100	+1.132	+18.1100	−5.892	+1.464	+3.090	+4.028
Takai Hardy	245	1,682	12.7%	+19.396	+4.874	−14.596	−6.66	+8.498	−3.792	+20.8100	−6.494	−7.06	+5.7100	−2.362

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Quinn Denker	1,651	277	85.6%	-15.324	99.728	115.030	50.0%42	23.5%22	17.6%42	24.3%34	54.1%32	68.2%48	16.1%44	37.1%26
Julius Mims	1,363	565	70.7%	-12.228	100.530	112.734	51.0%48	22.8%20	17.6%42	23.5%32	53.9%32	71.0%60	16.1%44	37.6%26
D'Angelo Minnis	1,176	751	61.0%	-14.424	101.132	115.528	50.4%46	23.3%22	16.6%48	24.6%34	54.5%30	68.5%48	16.4%46	36.0%30
Trevon Blassingame	966	962	50.1%	-14.624	99.428	114.032	51.0%50	22.4%20	18.3%38	21.6%26	54.4%30	70.0%54	16.1%44	39.3%22
Kyson Rose	952	976	49.4%	-19.618	98.326	117.924	50.1%46	24.0%24	19.0%32	22.2%28	54.6%30	68.0%46	15.2%38	34.9%32
Terren Frank	838	1,090	43.5%	-11.828	101.032	112.734	50.2%46	25.1%28	17.9%40	26.1%38	54.4%30	69.0%50	17.5%54	35.1%32
EJ Neal Jr.	795	1,132	41.3%	-11.628	102.134	113.732	49.6%42	27.2%36	17.9%40	31.6%56	53.8%34	67.3%42	17.3%52	38.0%24
Kristian Gonzalez	663	1,265	34.4%	-8.932	103.738	112.634	53.2%60	22.8%20	18.3%38	29.0%48	54.8%28	69.0%50	17.9%56	36.4%28
Tyler Linhardt	607	1,320	31.5%	-12.526	103.738	116.328	50.0%42	23.0%22	14.3%66	26.8%40	53.6%34	68.6%48	16.3%46	44.1%16
Titus Yearout	293	1,634	15.2%	-7.734	98.326	106.050	42.3%16	33.7%64	18.4%36	41.5%76	48.9%56	69.9%54	19.3%66	40.9%20
Takai Hardy	245	1,682	12.7%	3.754	104.840	101.164	44.3%22	31.4%54	14.3%66	44.3%82	48.3%60	62.6%24	21.7%80	35.5%30

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Quinn Denker	1,651	277	85.6%	-0.346	106.244	106.450	50.4%48	28.5%40	17.3%44	37.2%68	52.3%40	71.4%60	20.7%74	40.2%22
Julius Mims	1,363	565	70.7%	-15.524	101.132	116.626	47.9%36	27.5%36	17.4%44	32.6%58	53.9%32	63.3%26	18.3%60	37.1%26
D'Angelo Minnis	1,176	751	61.0%	-11.228	100.030	111.238	49.5%42	25.8%30	19.0%32	28.7%46	53.0%38	69.1%50	17.2%52	39.8%22
Trevon Blassingame	966	962	50.1%	-11.628	101.934	113.532	49.1%40	26.1%30	16.7%48	30.7%52	53.4%36	67.4%44	17.4%52	35.7%30
Kyson Rose	952	976	49.4%	-7.134	103.036	110.040	50.1%46	24.5%26	16.1%52	30.0%50	53.2%36	69.5%52	18.1%58	40.0%22
Terren Frank	838	1,090	43.5%	-14.224	100.430	114.630	49.9%42	23.6%22	17.3%44	26.2%38	53.5%34	68.5%48	16.1%44	39.3%22
EJ Neal Jr.	795	1,132	41.3%	-14.224	99.628	113.932	50.4%46	22.1%18	17.3%44	22.3%28	53.9%32	69.8%54	16.3%46	37.1%26
Kristian Gonzalez	663	1,265	34.4%	-15.324	99.128	114.430	48.5%38	24.9%26	17.2%44	24.7%34	53.4%36	68.6%48	16.1%44	38.0%24
Tyler Linhardt	607	1,320	31.5%	-13.426	99.228	112.734	50.1%46	24.9%26	19.0%32	25.8%38	54.0%32	68.8%50	16.9%50	34.5%34
Titus Yearout	293	1,634	15.2%	-14.124	101.132	115.230	51.4%52	22.3%20	17.4%44	23.4%30	54.7%30	68.5%48	16.2%46	36.9%28
Takai Hardy	245	1,682	12.7%	-15.624	100.030	115.728	50.9%48	23.1%22	18.0%38	23.5%32	54.7%30	69.6%54	16.0%44	37.8%26

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.