Big 10

Indiana

19-13NET#55Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #56Coach: Mike Woodson

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,144	1,044	4.2—	110.3—	106.1—	51.1%—	35.0%—	17.2%—	32.8%—	49.7%—	69.0%—	17.0%—	29.3%—
MgbakoM. MgbakoBalloO. BalloRiceM. RiceGoodeL. GoodeGallowayT. Galloway	226	105	11.5—	116.0—	104.4—	54.6%—	38.4%—	19.5%—	32.3%—	48.4%—	68.8%—	15.7%—	27.1%—
MgbakoM. MgbakoBalloO. BalloGoodeL. GoodeGallowayT. GallowayLealA. Leal	172	92	-5.8—	108.4—	114.2—	50.0%—	33.7%—	14.0%—	22.8%—	59.4%—	68.8%—	21.9%—	30.1%—
ReneauM. ReneauMgbakoM. MgbakoBalloO. BalloRiceM. RiceCarlyleK. Carlyle	132	64	2.8—	103.8—	101.0—	53.1%—	29.5%—	20.5%—	18.6%—	51.3%—	73.8%—	17.2%—	8.5%—
ReneauM. ReneauMgbakoM. MgbakoBalloO. BalloRiceM. RiceGallowayT. Galloway	131	67	12.1—	123.8—	111.7—	61.0%—	47.6%—	23.7%—	21.2%—	55.9%—	79.7%—	13.7%—	13.4%—
ReneauM. ReneauMgbakoM. MgbakoRiceM. RiceGoodeL. GoodeGallowayT. Galloway	90	39	-35.6—	97.1—	132.7—	45.8%—	25.5%—	13.4%—	19.3%—	57.5%—	62.5%—	13.3%—	58.9%—
ReneauM. ReneauRiceM. RiceGoodeL. GoodeGallowayT. GallowayLealA. Leal	73	35	26.7—	114.8—	88.1—	59.5%—	13.3%—	10.9%—	20.6%—	43.0%—	73.7%—	18.4%—	26.6%—
BalloO. BalloRiceM. RiceGoodeL. GoodeGallowayT. GallowayLealA. Leal	68	34	35.6—	122.1—	86.5—	61.7%—	37.9%—	19.1%—	85.1%—	45.6%—	69.4%—	24.3%—	36.8%—
ReneauM. ReneauMgbakoM. MgbakoGoodeL. GoodeGallowayT. GallowayLealA. Leal	50	21	52.0—	130.4—	78.4—	65.7%—	30.0%—	16.1%—	77.1%—	35.0%—	67.7%—	23.3%—	32.5%—
BalloO. BalloRiceM. RiceTuckerB. TuckerGoodeL. GoodeGallowayT. Galloway	46	24	-6.3—	98.5—	104.8—	45.1%—	37.9%—	21.9%—	29.3%—	47.7%—	60.0%—	21.0%—	27.3%—
ReneauM. ReneauRiceM. RiceTuckerB. TuckerGoodeL. GoodeGallowayT. Galloway	45	21	4.9—	116.4—	111.5—	51.2%—	25.0%—	9.0%—	35.0%—	52.6%—	78.3%—	12.9%—	35.9%—
MgbakoM. MgbakoBalloO. BalloRiceM. RiceGoodeL. GoodeLealA. Leal	39	22	-16.8—	109.6—	126.5—	48.6%—	41.7%—	17.8%—	29.7%—	52.6%—	54.2%—	14.6%—	38.5%—
ReneauM. ReneauMgbakoM. MgbakoBalloO. BalloRiceM. RiceLealA. Leal	39	21	-96.6—	77.0—	173.6—	40.3%—	25.0%—	20.5%—	5.6%—	83.3%—	57.1%—	8.4%—	36.4%—
MgbakoM. MgbakoRiceM. RiceGoodeL. GoodeHattonL. HattonGallowayT. Galloway	36	15	-63.3—	74.3—	137.6—	39.3%—	31.6%—	30.3%—	25.0%—	58.9%—	64.3%—	12.2%—	42.9%—
BalloO. BalloTuckerB. TuckerGoodeL. GoodeGallowayT. GallowayLealA. Leal	35	14	48.7—	131.4—	82.7—	56.0%—	28.6%—	14.3%—	76.0%—	47.9%—	94.1%—	24.8%—	37.5%—
ReneauM. ReneauMgbakoM. MgbakoBalloO. BalloCarlyleK. CarlyleGallowayT. Galloway	32	14	6.4—	105.1—	98.8—	56.0%—	23.1%—	21.6%—	28.0%—	61.4%—	83.3%—	26.3%—	22.7%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.