Indiana19-13

Big 10Coach: Mike Woodson

19-13NET#56

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Trey Galloway	1,508	635	70.4%	+5.672	+2.264	−3.468	+3.282	−2.430	+0.344	−0.252	+0.246	+4.890	−0.150	−1.860
Myles Rice	1,480	664	69.0%	−3.140	−1.742	+1.440	−0.644	+1.970	+1.428	−0.748	−1.060	+0.254	−2.714	+2.834
Oumar Ballo	1,478	665	69.0%	−1.046	−1.146	−0.150	+0.656	+8.998	+5.12	−5.322	+3.814	+2.172	+0.662	−14.396
Luke Goode	1,421	723	66.3%	+0.252	−0.548	−0.752	−2.724	−4.116	−3.390	+10.094	−1.868	−2.626	+2.284	+9.48
Mackenzie Mgbako	1,360	783	63.5%	−8.422	+3.168	+11.44	+1.566	+6.996	+2.416	−11.84	+4.68	−1.140	−2.912	+0.150
Malik Reneau	1,022	1,121	47.7%	+1.656	−0.250	−1.860	+4.490	−5.012	+1.132	−5.522	+1.236	+6.496	−1.034	−4.172
Anthony Leal	887	1,257	41.4%	+7.478	+5.680	−1.860	+1.466	−1.538	−3.492	+4.778	+1.236	−1.338	+3.192	+3.928
Kanaan Carlyle	663	1,481	30.9%	−6.128	−11.08	−4.976	−7.64	−1.934	−1.370	+1.058	−0.858	+0.960	+2.384	−6.984
Bryson Tucker	629	1,514	29.3%	+6.476	+2.264	−4.172	−1.734	−1.142	−2.584	+9.392	−5.492	−5.88	+0.358	+5.322
Langdon Hatton	196	1,947	9.1%	−19.36	−7.516	+11.84	−5.98	−1.638	−0.456	−0.550	−1.566	−6.08	−4.54	+9.110

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Trey Galloway	1,508	635	70.4%	5.958	111.054	105.154	52.1%54	34.3%64	17.3%44	32.8%58	49.7%56	70.5%56	16.9%48	28.8%52
Myles Rice	1,480	664	69.0%	3.352	109.852	106.552	50.9%46	35.6%68	17.6%42	32.6%58	49.4%56	69.1%50	16.1%42	30.2%46
Oumar Ballo	1,478	665	69.0%	3.954	110.052	106.152	51.3%50	37.8%76	18.8%34	31.2%54	50.8%50	69.7%54	17.2%50	24.9%64
Luke Goode	1,421	723	66.3%	4.354	110.152	105.952	50.2%46	33.7%62	16.1%54	36.3%66	49.1%56	68.1%46	17.7%54	32.6%40
Mackenzie Mgbako	1,360	783	63.5%	1.148	111.456	110.440	51.6%50	37.6%76	18.1%38	28.7%46	51.4%46	68.6%48	15.9%42	29.4%50
Malik Reneau	1,022	1,121	47.7%	5.056	110.252	105.254	53.5%60	32.2%56	17.8%40	29.9%50	50.3%50	72.4%66	16.4%44	27.2%56
Anthony Leal	887	1,257	41.4%	8.662	113.660	105.054	51.9%52	34.2%64	15.2%60	35.6%66	50.4%50	68.2%46	18.8%62	31.7%42
Kanaan Carlyle	663	1,481	30.9%	-0.046	102.734	102.860	45.9%26	33.7%62	16.3%52	33.6%60	49.2%56	69.6%54	18.5%60	24.6%64
Bryson Tucker	629	1,514	29.3%	8.762	111.956	103.260	49.9%40	34.3%64	15.4%60	39.5%72	45.9%72	65.2%34	17.2%50	33.0%38
Langdon Hatton	196	1,947	9.1%	-13.326	103.536	116.826	45.7%24	33.6%62	16.8%48	32.4%56	48.3%60	63.6%28	12.9%22	37.6%28

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Trey Galloway	1,508	635	70.4%	0.348	108.848	108.546	48.9%38	36.7%72	17.0%46	33.0%58	49.6%56	65.7%36	17.0%48	30.6%46
Myles Rice	1,480	664	69.0%	6.458	111.556	105.154	51.5%50	33.7%62	16.3%52	33.3%60	50.3%50	68.8%50	18.8%62	27.4%56
Oumar Ballo	1,478	665	69.0%	4.956	111.154	106.152	50.7%46	28.9%42	13.7%72	36.5%68	47.1%66	67.5%44	16.5%46	39.2%24
Luke Goode	1,421	723	66.3%	4.154	110.754	106.650	52.9%56	37.8%76	19.4%30	26.3%38	50.9%50	70.7%58	15.5%38	23.2%68
Mackenzie Mgbako	1,360	783	63.5%	9.564	108.448	98.970	50.1%46	30.8%50	15.7%56	40.5%74	46.8%68	69.7%54	18.7%62	29.3%50
Malik Reneau	1,022	1,121	47.7%	3.554	110.452	106.950	49.1%38	37.3%74	16.7%48	35.4%64	49.1%56	66.0%38	17.4%52	31.3%44
Anthony Leal	887	1,257	41.4%	1.248	108.046	106.950	50.5%46	35.6%68	18.6%36	30.9%52	49.2%56	69.5%52	15.6%40	27.7%54
Kanaan Carlyle	663	1,481	30.9%	6.158	113.760	107.648	53.5%60	35.7%68	17.6%42	32.5%58	49.9%54	68.7%48	16.2%44	31.5%42
Bryson Tucker	629	1,514	29.3%	2.352	109.752	107.348	51.6%50	35.3%68	18.0%40	30.1%50	51.3%48	70.9%60	16.8%48	27.7%54
Langdon Hatton	196	1,947	9.1%	6.058	111.054	105.054	51.7%50	35.2%68	17.3%44	32.9%58	49.8%54	69.6%54	17.4%52	28.5%52

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.