Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
IU Indy logoIU Indy logoIU Indy logoIU Indy logo

IU Indy7-22

HorizonCoach: Paul Corsaro

7-22NET#303

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Jarvis Walker−14.210−5.026+9.110−6.56+4.186+1.328+5.280+3.914+1.466−0.838+11.26
Sean Craig+11.088−1.940−12.896−2.822+1.364−2.078+0.354−1.768+9.0100+1.170−6.180
Paul Zilinskas+26.8100+12.296−14.596+3.282−0.746−4.896+3.370−2.676+14.4100−1.134+1.442
Alec Millender+5.572−0.448−5.978+1.264−2.330−0.658+1.662−2.978+3.282−0.248−1.356
DeSean Goode+18.298+14.098−4.272+5.896+2.978+0.148+10.994−4.690−1.636−0.246−2.060
Keenan Garner−12.812−9.810+3.032−2.228−1.142+2.218−7.514+1.136−2.824−1.132−10.994
Timaris Brown−18.96−10.88+8.212−3.916−1.736+2.814−1.840+3.814+2.576−0.936+16.52
Ron Rutland III−7.624−3.334+4.226+1.366−0.250+0.738−6.218−2.070−11.52+0.356−1.658
Nathan Dudukovich−20.14−3.632+16.60−2.326−4.316+0.048+3.572+8.80−6.76+1.270−4.774
Julian Steinfeld+14.694−0.350−14.998+1.060−0.348+0.148−13.74−1.868+5.192+4.298+2.336
Caleb Hannah+7.980+6.082−1.960+2.172+5.390+0.542−11.66−2.576−15.22+6.6100−1.056

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Jarvis Walker-13.426111.154124.51449.3%3833.7%6216.3%5234.2%6257.7%2063.6%3015.9%4234.9%34
Sean Craig-9.132111.656120.72049.8%4033.3%6215.7%5633.4%6056.7%2265.1%3416.2%4431.9%42
Paul Zilinskas-5.638114.462120.02051.0%4833.0%5815.1%6234.0%6056.5%2466.3%3815.8%4033.3%38
Alec Millender-9.930111.856121.71850.6%4632.6%5816.0%5433.7%6056.4%2464.1%3016.0%4232.7%40
DeSean Goode-2.742118.372121.02053.1%5834.5%6416.1%5438.5%7254.9%3062.7%2615.9%4232.1%42
Keenan Garner-17.720106.944124.51449.2%3832.6%5617.2%4429.5%4857.6%2062.0%2215.4%3827.6%54
Timaris Brown-24.814104.138128.91047.5%3231.9%5418.1%3832.0%5659.9%1465.3%3615.4%3845.2%16
Ron Rutland III-17.420109.250126.51251.4%5033.0%5816.7%4828.3%4455.4%2853.8%816.2%4431.7%42
Nathan Dudukovich-28.610108.850137.4448.3%3429.3%4416.1%5436.4%6864.7%657.5%1217.0%4828.9%50
Julian Steinfeld2.452111.656109.24451.2%4832.9%5816.2%5420.7%2255.4%2868.2%4619.9%7035.1%34
Caleb Hannah-3.740117.570121.21852.3%5438.0%7616.5%5022.5%2854.7%3049.2%422.2%8232.1%42

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Jarvis Walker0.848116.166115.33055.8%7029.6%4415.0%6229.0%4653.8%3462.3%2416.7%4623.7%68
Sean Craig-20.118113.560133.5652.7%5632.0%5617.7%4233.1%5858.5%1856.0%1015.1%3638.0%28
Paul Zilinskas-32.48102.232134.6447.8%3233.6%6219.9%2630.7%5259.1%1651.9%616.9%4831.9%42
Alec Millender-15.424112.258127.61049.4%4034.9%6616.6%5032.1%5659.3%1460.8%2016.1%4234.0%36
DeSean Goode-20.918104.338125.21447.3%3031.6%5416.1%5427.6%4259.5%1464.3%3216.1%4234.1%36
Keenan Garner-4.938116.768121.61851.4%5033.6%6215.0%6237.0%6856.5%2464.8%3416.6%4638.5%26
Timaris Brown-5.936114.964120.72051.4%5033.6%6215.3%6033.9%6056.1%2462.8%2616.2%4428.7%52
Ron Rutland III-9.830112.558122.31650.1%4633.1%5816.0%5434.4%6257.4%2065.4%3616.0%4233.3%38
Nathan Dudukovich-8.432112.458120.82050.6%4633.7%6216.1%5432.9%5855.8%2664.2%3015.9%4033.6%38
Julian Steinfeld-12.228111.956124.11450.3%4633.1%5816.1%5434.4%6257.2%2263.0%2615.7%4032.8%40
Caleb Hannah-11.628111.556123.11650.2%4632.7%5816.1%5434.2%6257.2%2264.4%3215.6%3833.1%38
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.