Kent St.22-10

MACCoach: Rob Senderoff

22-10NET#160

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cian Medley	1,857	429	81.2%	+16.196	+13.898	−2.362	+5.194	+2.576	−2.584	+12.296	−0.252	−0.346	+1.678	−7.886
Delrecco Gillespie	1,843	444	80.6%	+8.482	+11.496	+3.032	+1.364	+5.392	−1.168	+18.4100	+1.730	−3.320	+0.154	−8.788
Morgan Safford	1,760	527	77.0%	+10.988	+7.988	−3.066	+1.768	+1.870	−1.674	+9.994	−1.464	+1.566	−0.542	+0.546
Jahari Williamson	1,431	856	62.6%	+7.178	+7.486	+0.348	+1.768	+3.180	−1.166	+7.688	+1.038	−4.216	+1.880	−7.184
Rob Whaley Jr.	1,269	1,018	55.5%	−3.936	−2.338	+1.638	+1.668	−5.98	−0.558	−7.316	+0.740	−2.626	+0.662	−5.678
Quinn Woidke	1,123	1,164	49.1%	+3.062	−1.940	−4.976	−0.940	+1.162	+0.540	−1.742	−3.582	+3.786	−1.032	+10.36
Rayvon Griffith	711	1,576	31.1%	−14.810	−9.112	+5.718	−4.214	−0.250	+1.130	−6.320	+2.226	+0.254	−1.722	+11.46
Magnus Entenmann	608	1,679	26.6%	+1.256	+2.464	+1.242	+2.274	+3.180	+1.722	−5.124	+0.840	−0.644	+0.966	−2.062
Dezmon Briscoe	400	1,887	17.5%	−11.514	−19.92	−8.588	−7.54	−4.514	+0.344	−18.82	−2.374	+6.296	+0.764	−0.250
Omer Hamama	245	2,042	10.7%	−8.222	−2.536	+5.718	+7.798	−16.22	+2.910	+3.270	+1.334	−0.842	−1.724	+0.944
Brenden Moss	108	2,179	4.7%	−8.420	−11.08	−2.664	−9.52	+6.094	−0.354	−15.42	+3.316	+8.7100	+1.170	+8.410

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cian Medley	1,857	429	81.2%	4.754	114.760	110.044	52.2%50	36.0%74	17.3%38	46.0%76	52.2%44	70.7%52	16.3%50	38.1%34
Delrecco Gillespie	1,843	444	80.6%	3.252	114.360	111.142	51.5%46	36.7%74	17.6%36	47.4%80	52.5%42	70.1%50	16.0%48	37.9%34
Morgan Safford	1,760	527	77.0%	4.252	113.958	109.744	51.7%46	35.9%72	17.4%36	46.0%76	51.9%46	71.1%54	15.8%48	39.7%30
Jahari Williamson	1,431	856	62.6%	4.354	114.860	110.642	51.9%48	36.7%76	17.4%36	46.5%78	52.6%42	69.2%46	16.6%54	37.0%36
Rob Whaley Jr.	1,269	1,018	55.5%	-0.146	111.052	111.240	52.0%48	32.8%62	17.6%36	40.4%66	52.5%42	69.6%48	16.2%50	37.1%36
Quinn Woidke	1,123	1,164	49.1%	3.252	111.152	107.948	50.8%42	36.1%74	18.1%32	42.8%70	50.4%52	72.6%62	15.4%44	45.0%20
Rayvon Griffith	711	1,576	31.1%	-8.432	105.838	114.334	48.4%32	35.4%70	18.6%30	39.4%64	53.7%38	71.0%54	14.8%40	47.3%18
Magnus Entenmann	608	1,679	26.6%	2.550	113.858	111.340	52.8%52	37.8%78	19.1%26	39.9%66	52.8%42	70.3%50	16.6%54	38.1%34
Dezmon Briscoe	400	1,887	17.5%	-7.932	95.618	103.560	45.2%20	31.9%58	18.0%32	28.3%38	50.3%52	75.8%74	16.5%52	39.5%30
Omer Hamama	245	2,042	10.7%	-5.736	109.848	115.530	58.2%76	20.6%18	20.4%18	46.6%78	53.4%40	70.1%50	14.5%38	40.5%28
Brenden Moss	108	2,179	4.7%	-6.434	101.628	108.048	42.2%14	41.2%88	17.6%36	29.1%40	55.4%30	79.2%84	17.0%56	47.6%16

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cian Medley	1,857	429	81.2%	-11.528	100.828	112.338	47.1%28	33.5%66	19.8%22	33.8%52	52.4%44	71.1%54	14.6%38	45.9%18
Delrecco Gillespie	1,843	444	80.6%	-5.236	102.932	108.148	50.3%42	31.3%56	18.7%28	29.0%38	50.8%50	73.5%66	15.8%48	46.7%18
Morgan Safford	1,760	527	77.0%	-6.734	106.038	112.736	50.0%36	34.2%66	19.0%26	36.1%58	53.3%40	69.7%48	16.4%52	39.3%32
Jahari Williamson	1,431	856	62.6%	-2.840	107.542	110.342	50.2%42	33.6%66	18.5%30	38.9%64	51.6%48	73.3%66	14.9%40	44.1%22
Rob Whaley Jr.	1,269	1,018	55.5%	3.852	113.456	109.644	50.4%42	38.8%82	18.1%32	47.7%80	51.8%46	72.2%60	15.6%46	42.7%24
Quinn Woidke	1,123	1,164	49.1%	0.246	113.056	112.836	51.7%48	34.9%68	17.5%36	44.5%74	53.9%36	68.9%44	16.5%52	34.7%42
Rayvon Griffith	711	1,576	31.1%	6.456	114.960	108.548	52.6%52	35.6%72	17.4%36	45.7%76	51.5%48	70.7%52	16.5%52	35.9%40
Magnus Entenmann	608	1,679	26.6%	1.348	111.452	110.244	50.7%42	34.7%68	17.3%38	45.0%76	52.0%46	71.0%54	15.7%46	40.2%28
Dezmon Briscoe	400	1,887	17.5%	3.652	115.662	112.038	52.7%52	36.4%74	17.8%34	47.2%78	52.6%42	69.6%48	15.8%48	39.7%30
Omer Hamama	245	2,042	10.7%	2.550	112.354	109.844	50.6%42	36.9%76	17.5%36	43.4%72	52.1%44	70.9%54	16.1%50	39.5%30
Brenden Moss	108	2,179	4.7%	2.048	112.654	110.642	51.8%48	35.2%70	17.8%34	44.5%74	52.1%44	70.4%52	15.9%48	39.2%32

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.