Louisiana Tech19-10

C-USACoach: Talvin Hester

19-10NET#87

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Isaiah Crawford	1,473	271	84.5%	+11.286	+4.172	−7.282	+5.794	−6.010	−0.554	+2.666	+1.632	−0.050	+4.798	−9.890
Tahlik Chavez	1,351	393	77.5%	+13.590	+9.090	−4.572	+5.494	+1.666	+0.442	+1.460	−1.564	+2.776	−1.528	−8.688
Daniel Batcho	1,204	540	69.0%	+15.292	+6.482	−8.788	+2.072	−4.218	−4.294	+7.988	−4.186	+2.372	−1.726	−11.594
Sean Newman Jr.	1,144	600	65.6%	−2.242	+6.882	+9.010	+6.396	−6.98	−4.294	−7.316	+5.86	+3.682	−2.120	−2.564
Dravon Mangum	808	936	46.3%	−5.032	−0.248	+4.824	−3.518	+1.868	−1.368	+4.878	+3.418	−0.050	+2.484	+10.76
Jordan Crawford	662	1,082	37.9%	−4.036	−0.646	+3.532	−2.228	+3.782	+1.132	+5.882	−1.464	−3.718	−0.544	+8.012
Tyler Henry	540	1,204	31.0%	−10.118	−9.612	+0.546	−4.910	−0.646	+1.824	+0.454	+1.534	−0.150	+0.560	−6.682
Jaylin Henderson	519	1,225	29.8%	+3.464	−1.044	−4.472	−0.842	+1.464	+1.032	+0.554	−4.286	−1.340	−0.050	+3.232
Devin Ree	501	1,242	28.8%	+1.858	+2.262	+0.346	+0.152	+2.976	−0.860	−6.420	−1.564	−1.338	−0.936	+2.038
Will Allen	298	1,446	17.1%	−20.84	−13.96	+6.916	−3.120	+2.170	+8.00	−1.444	+3.814	+4.888	−0.642	+17.60
Terri Miller Jr.	188	1,556	10.8%	+0.652	−4.030	−4.672	−3.022	+6.394	+2.220	−13.14	−4.186	−10.42	+3.894	−5.778

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Isaiah Crawford	1,473	271	84.5%	13.270	111.858	98.670	51.9%54	37.0%74	19.8%28	41.5%76	45.6%72	68.5%48	18.7%62	30.2%46
Tahlik Chavez	1,351	393	77.5%	14.572	113.260	98.770	52.1%56	38.4%80	20.0%26	41.4%76	45.0%74	69.1%50	17.6%54	29.8%46
Daniel Batcho	1,204	540	69.0%	16.274	113.160	97.074	51.5%52	36.7%74	18.6%36	43.6%80	44.1%78	69.2%50	17.4%54	28.3%50
Sean Newman Jr.	1,144	600	65.6%	10.664	113.562	102.958	53.1%60	35.4%70	18.4%36	38.6%70	47.4%64	69.9%54	17.2%52	30.8%44
Dravon Mangum	808	936	46.3%	8.862	111.056	102.260	49.1%40	38.9%82	19.2%32	43.7%80	47.2%64	68.5%48	19.2%66	37.6%26
Jordan Crawford	662	1,082	37.9%	9.062	110.854	101.862	49.6%42	40.2%84	20.6%22	44.7%82	44.5%76	66.3%38	17.7%56	36.6%28
Tyler Henry	540	1,204	31.0%	4.454	104.540	100.166	47.5%34	37.6%78	21.1%20	41.4%76	46.3%68	68.5%48	18.3%60	27.1%56
Jaylin Henderson	519	1,225	29.8%	13.870	110.454	96.674	50.3%46	39.0%82	20.6%22	41.4%76	42.4%82	67.7%44	17.9%56	34.0%34
Devin Ree	501	1,242	28.8%	12.768	112.760	100.066	51.0%50	40.0%82	19.3%30	36.6%68	44.3%76	67.6%44	17.3%52	33.1%36
Will Allen	298	1,446	17.1%	-5.936	99.628	105.552	48.3%36	39.8%82	26.5%4	39.9%74	48.5%58	72.6%66	17.5%54	46.6%14
Terri Miller Jr.	188	1,556	10.8%	11.968	107.646	95.776	48.3%36	43.5%90	21.8%18	29.5%50	41.7%84	59.4%16	21.3%78	26.7%56

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Isaiah Crawford	1,473	271	84.5%	1.950	107.746	105.752	46.1%28	42.9%90	20.3%24	38.9%72	44.0%78	68.5%48	14.0%30	39.9%22
Tahlik Chavez	1,351	393	77.5%	1.048	104.238	103.258	46.8%30	36.8%74	19.6%28	40.0%74	46.5%68	66.4%38	19.1%64	38.4%24
Daniel Batcho	1,204	540	69.0%	1.048	106.744	105.752	49.6%42	40.9%86	22.8%14	35.6%66	48.2%60	66.9%42	19.2%64	39.8%22
Sean Newman Jr.	1,144	600	65.6%	12.768	106.644	93.978	46.8%30	42.3%88	22.7%14	45.9%84	41.6%84	66.3%38	19.4%66	33.3%34
Dravon Mangum	808	936	46.3%	13.870	111.256	97.572	52.5%58	37.1%76	20.5%24	38.8%72	43.8%78	68.6%48	16.9%50	26.9%56
Jordan Crawford	662	1,082	37.9%	13.068	111.456	98.470	51.7%54	36.5%72	19.5%30	38.9%72	45.8%70	70.0%54	18.2%58	28.6%50
Tyler Henry	540	1,204	31.0%	14.672	114.162	99.668	52.4%56	38.2%78	19.4%30	41.0%76	44.8%74	68.6%48	17.8%56	33.8%34
Jaylin Henderson	519	1,225	29.8%	10.464	111.456	101.064	51.2%50	37.6%78	19.6%28	40.9%76	46.6%68	68.9%50	18.0%58	30.7%44
Devin Ree	501	1,242	28.8%	10.966	110.554	99.668	50.9%48	37.1%76	20.1%24	43.0%80	45.7%72	68.9%50	18.2%60	31.2%42
Will Allen	298	1,446	17.1%	15.072	113.562	98.570	51.4%50	37.6%78	18.5%36	41.3%76	44.7%76	67.8%44	18.1%58	29.0%48
Terri Miller Jr.	188	1,556	10.8%	11.366	111.656	100.266	51.3%50	37.2%76	19.7%28	42.6%78	45.8%70	69.8%54	17.5%54	32.4%38

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Louisiana TechLa. Tech19-10

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Louisiana Tech19-10