UMassMassachusetts16-16

MACCoach: Frank Martin

16-16NET#187

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Marcus Banks Jr.	1,777	406	81.4%	+8.280	+2.866	−5.578	−5.68	+5.892	−4.696	−3.730	−2.474	−1.238	+0.662	−6.280
Leonardo Bettiol	1,527	657	69.9%	+16.496	+5.780	−10.792	+5.594	−0.348	+2.018	+6.182	−4.990	+3.080	+2.486	−9.792
Danny Carbuccia	1,457	727	66.7%	+1.758	+5.982	+4.224	+5.996	−0.942	+0.736	+3.068	+2.820	−0.346	−0.444	−2.062
Jayden Ndjigue	1,428	756	65.4%	+25.2100	+4.174	−21.198	+2.374	+4.688	+1.722	+4.576	−8.398	+1.162	+4.998	+0.348
Daniel Hankins-Sanford	1,405	778	64.4%	+0.552	+2.364	+1.838	+2.476	+0.454	+0.540	−0.350	+5.76	+4.992	+1.170	−2.664
K'Jei Parker	1,151	1,032	52.7%	−7.922	−6.220	+1.738	−3.816	−3.818	−0.150	+8.690	−0.150	+2.374	−0.444	+14.02
Dwayne Wimbley Jr.	736	1,448	33.7%	−11.614	−9.910	+1.738	−4.910	−4.018	−0.456	−4.826	−2.374	−1.930	−2.712	−0.352
Luka Damjanac	451	1,733	20.7%	−6.526	+2.264	+8.610	+0.556	+0.658	−1.574	−8.112	+3.118	−4.214	−1.822	+0.646
Isaiah Placide	430	1,754	19.7%	−12.014	+11.996	+23.90	+5.294	−2.926	−3.190	−2.736	+8.30	−3.618	−4.54	+13.24
Dimitri Clerc	377	1,807	17.3%	−9.618	−11.78	−2.160	−8.14	+3.280	+0.146	−6.020	+0.544	+1.566	+0.152	−8.990
Donovan Brown	129	2,054	5.9%	−20.44	−13.56	+6.914	−5.68	+0.960	+5.42	−5.522	−2.878	−14.42	−0.738	−11.694

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Marcus Banks Jr.	1,777	406	81.4%	3.852	110.850	107.050	52.0%48	34.9%68	16.5%44	36.3%58	52.1%44	74.0%68	16.8%54	43.0%24
Leonardo Bettiol	1,527	657	69.9%	7.358	112.054	104.756	54.6%60	33.9%66	18.0%32	38.9%64	51.1%50	75.1%72	17.4%60	41.2%26
Danny Carbuccia	1,457	727	66.7%	2.850	112.354	109.544	54.9%62	33.7%66	17.6%34	38.0%62	53.5%38	74.1%68	16.5%52	43.5%22
Jayden Ndjigue	1,428	756	65.4%	10.864	111.752	100.966	53.7%56	35.6%72	18.0%32	38.5%62	49.6%58	74.6%68	18.3%66	44.3%22
Daniel Hankins-Sanford	1,405	778	64.4%	2.450	111.152	108.746	53.8%56	34.1%66	17.6%36	36.9%58	54.7%34	76.1%74	17.0%56	43.2%24
K'Jei Parker	1,151	1,032	52.7%	-1.542	107.442	108.946	51.1%44	32.2%60	17.4%36	41.1%68	52.5%42	75.3%72	16.5%52	51.0%14
Dwayne Wimbley Jr.	736	1,448	33.7%	-5.436	103.734	109.146	49.7%36	31.4%56	17.1%38	33.8%52	51.1%50	73.0%62	14.9%40	44.0%22
Luka Damjanac	451	1,733	20.7%	-2.840	112.054	114.832	53.3%54	34.5%68	16.2%46	30.6%42	55.0%32	70.9%54	15.2%44	44.6%20
Isaiah Placide	430	1,754	19.7%	-7.434	119.872	127.312	57.1%72	31.7%58	14.9%58	34.8%54	59.3%18	71.3%56	13.0%28	54.8%10
Dimitri Clerc	377	1,807	17.3%	-5.736	100.626	106.352	46.3%24	36.5%74	17.5%36	32.1%46	53.0%40	75.4%72	16.7%54	36.8%36
Donovan Brown	129	2,054	5.9%	-17.020	97.622	114.532	47.7%30	34.8%68	22.5%10	31.8%46	50.0%58	60.8%16	16.0%50	33.3%44

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Marcus Banks Jr.	1,777	406	81.4%	-4.538	108.044	112.538	57.5%74	29.1%46	21.2%16	40.1%66	54.5%34	75.1%72	16.1%50	49.2%14
Leonardo Bettiol	1,527	657	69.9%	-9.230	106.338	115.430	49.1%36	34.2%66	16.0%48	32.8%48	56.0%28	72.1%60	15.0%42	50.9%14
Danny Carbuccia	1,457	727	66.7%	1.148	106.338	105.354	49.1%34	34.5%68	16.9%40	35.0%54	50.7%52	74.4%68	16.9%56	45.5%20
Jayden Ndjigue	1,428	756	65.4%	-14.424	107.642	122.018	51.4%46	31.1%54	16.3%46	34.1%52	58.0%22	73.5%66	13.4%30	43.9%22
Daniel Hankins-Sanford	1,405	778	64.4%	1.948	108.846	106.952	51.4%46	33.8%66	17.1%38	37.1%60	49.0%60	71.2%54	16.0%48	45.8%18
K'Jei Parker	1,151	1,032	52.7%	6.456	113.558	107.250	54.9%62	36.0%72	17.4%36	32.5%48	52.6%42	73.0%62	16.8%56	37.1%36
Dwayne Wimbley Jr.	736	1,448	33.7%	6.256	113.658	107.550	54.6%60	35.4%70	17.5%36	38.6%62	53.4%40	74.9%70	17.6%60	44.2%22
Luka Damjanac	451	1,733	20.7%	3.752	109.848	106.252	52.8%52	33.8%66	17.7%34	38.7%64	51.9%46	75.1%72	17.0%56	44.0%22
Isaiah Placide	430	1,754	19.7%	4.554	107.942	103.460	51.9%48	34.5%68	18.0%32	37.5%60	50.9%50	74.8%70	17.5%60	41.6%26
Dimitri Clerc	377	1,807	17.3%	3.952	112.354	108.448	54.4%60	33.3%66	17.4%36	38.1%62	52.5%44	73.9%68	16.6%54	45.7%18
Donovan Brown	129	2,054	5.9%	3.552	111.152	107.650	53.2%54	33.9%66	17.1%38	37.3%60	52.8%42	75.2%72	16.7%54	45.0%20

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

UMassMassachusettsUMass16-16

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

UMassMassachusetts16-16