Schedule
L
WL
W
W
L
WL
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
LLLWLWWLLL
WLWWLWLLLLWLLLWLLWWLLLLWLWWLLLTeam Stats
29 games- Net Rating-4.036
- Offensive Rating107.832
- Defensive Rating111.846
- Pace65.757
- Effective FG%51.0%55
- Off Rebound Pct28.8%55
- Turnover Pct20.3%42
- FT Attempt Rate35.7%73
Team Stats
29 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating-4.036
- Offensive Rating107.832
- Defensive Rating111.846
- Pace65.757
- Effective FG%51.0%55
- Off Rebound Pct28.8%55
- Turnover Pct20.3%42
- FT Attempt Rate35.7%73
Results & Margin
- Win Pct31.0%17
- Point Margin / Game-2.636
- Points / Game70.842
- Points Allowed / Game73.440
- 1st Half Margin-1.732
- 2nd Half Margin-0.941
- Avg Largest Lead7.520
- Avg Largest Deficit12.729
Box Score
- Points / Game70.842
- Rebounds / Game33.427
- Assists / Game12.230
- ORebs / Game9.847
- DRebs / Game23.621
- Steals / Game6.462
- Blocks / Game2.318
- Turnovers / Game13.340
- PFs / Game18.633
Shooting
- FGMs / Game25.043
- FGAs / Game56.029
- Field Goal Pct44.6%59
- 2PMs / Game17.855
- 2PAs / Game34.845
- 2-Point Pct51.2%64
- 3PMs / Game7.237
- 3PAs / Game21.236
- 3-Point Pct33.8%43
- FTMs / Game13.756
- FTAs / Game20.065
- Free Throw Pct68.6%28
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s50.3%61
- % Pts from 3s30.4%38
- % Pts from FTs19.3%59
- Paint Pts / Game25.782
- % Pts in Paint36.2%86
- Fast Break Pts / Game5.359
- % Pts on Fast Break7.5%59
- Points off TOVs / Game14.994
- % Pts off TOVs21.1%96
- 1st Half Pts / Game32.942
- 2nd Half Pts / Game37.751
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %54.7%56
- Points / Shot1.2658
- 3-Point Att Rate37.9%46
- Assist Pct48.8%26
- Assists / 100 Poss18.522
- Ast/Tov Ratio0.91x28
- PF Drawn / Game18.667
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%52.7%23
- Opp True Shooting %56.0%31
- Opp Field Goal Pct44.6%43
- Opp 2-Point Pct53.4%17
- Opp 3-Point Pct34.6%46
- Opp 3PA Rate46.6%4
- Opp FT Att Rate34.7%36
- Opp Points / Shot1.2930
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game73.440
- Paint Pts Allowed24.130
- Fast Break Pts Allowed6.721
- Pts off TOVs Allowed13.524
- Opp Assist Pct53.1%41
- TOVs Forced / Game13.873
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct67.7%11
- Turnovers Forced Pct21.0%66
- Steal Pct9.7%53
- Block Pct3.5%14
- Hakeem Pct13.2%27
- PF Efficiency1.00x49
- Steals / PF0.34x50
- Blocks / PF0.12x13
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 119 D-I teams- #30PO TOV Diff+42
- #60Paint Pts %44.2%
- #87Opp TOV%20.2%
- #97FTAR35.7%
- #136SOS1.1
- #160OREB%28.8%
- #161TS%54.1%
- #164eFG%51.0%
Where they rank bestof 119 D-I teams
- #30PO TOV Diff+42
- #60Paint Pts %44.2%
- #87Opp TOV%20.2%
- #97FTAR35.7%
- #136SOS1.1
- #160OREB%28.8%
- #161TS%54.1%
- #164eFG%51.0%
Where they rank worstof 119 D-I teams
- #3153PM Diff-58
- #315Opp OREB%32.3%
- #272Opp eFG%52.7%
- #264AST%48.8%
- #240TOV%19.6%
- #239REB Diff-59
- #223Pts Diff-76
- #2053P%33.8%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2018-19- 1
Tulsa 2021-2211-20AmericanMost alike in Opp eFG%, Opp TOV%, TOV%93 - 2
Northern KentuckyNKU 2023-2416-15HorizonMost alike in OREB%, eFG%, Opp OREB%88 - 3
Siena 2024-2514-18MAACMost alike in Tempo, Opp TOV%, Adj D88 - 4
UNC AshevilleUNCA 2021-2214-15Big SouthMost alike in Adj O, eFG%, Adj D88 - 5
SMU 2022-2310-22AmericanMost alike in Adj O, OREB%, Opp eFG%87 - 6
ConnecticutUConn 2017-1814-18AmericanMost alike in Opp OREB%, OREB%, Adj D87 - 7
Norfolk St. 2020-2115-8MEACMost alike in Opp TOV%, Adj O, Tempo87 - 8
Lamar 2016-1715-15SouthlandMost alike in Adj O, eFG%, TOV%87 - 9
South AlabamaS. Alabama 2021-2218-12Sun BeltMost alike in TOV%, Adj O, Tempo87 - 10
Brown 2021-2211-16IvyMost alike in OREB%, TOV%, Adj D86
Schedule
Loading the schedule
EthanStairJr
JaylenStoweSr
RossCummingsJr
DjordjeDimitrijevicJr
MarcusCohenSo
CoryKilbySr
VictorBafuttoFrDPDJPeavyFr
DanielLoveFr
FardawsAimaqFrCWCJWilliamsonFrLHLukeHamiltonFr
| E. StairEthan Stair | Jr | 6'4" | +1.288 | – | – | 61.0%80 | 15.9%34 | 11.7 | 5.3 | 1.3 | 41.5% | 79.7% |
| J. StoweJaylen Stowe | Sr | 6'4" | +0.566 | – | – | 59.1%73 | 18.2%51 | 10.5 | 4.9 | 1.2 | 29.7% | 72.2% |
| R. CummingsRoss Cummings | Jr | 6'3" | +0.149 | – | – | 61.0%80 | 23.8%84 | 17.4 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 39.0% | 79.8% |
| D. DimitrijevicDjordje Dimitrijevic | Jr | 6'2" | +0.048 | – | – | 55.1%55 | 23.4%83 | 9.6 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 27.2% | 77.2% |
| M. CohenMarcus Cohen | So | 6'4" | -0.240 | – | – | 46.4%19 | 19.2%58 | 4.6 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 0.0% | 42.9% |
| C. KilbyCory Kilby | Sr | 6'7" | -0.621 | – | – | 51.7%37 | 15.3%30 | 6.1 | 3.4 | 1.0 | 20.6% | 76.7% |
| V. BafuttoVictor Bafutto | Fr | 6'10" | – | – | – | 59.6%75 | 21.1%72 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 45.0% |
| DJ Peavy | Fr | 6'3" | – | – | – | 96.7%98 | 18.5%53 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 55.6% | 85.7% |
| D. LoveDaniel Love | Fr | 6'3" | – | – | – | 33.7%7 | 25.8%91 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 12.5% | 46.7% |
| F. AimaqFardaws Aimaq | Fr | 6'11" | – | – | – | 50.6%33 | 22.8%80 | 5.0 | 5.3 | 0.2 | 100.0% | 41.3% |
| CJ Williamson | Fr | 6'3" | – | – | – | 46.0%19 | 18.0%49 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.0% | 42.9% |
| L. HamiltonLuke Hamilton | Fr | 6'8" | – | – | – | 38.9%10 | 16.3%37 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 25.0% | 46.2% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-26 | 19-13 | #173 | -1.149 | 111.563 | 112.632 | -5.525 | +4156 | -144 | 33.7%75 | -7384 | 53.3%72 | 34.9%65 | 72.3%46 |
| 24-25 | 14-19 | #256 | -6.431 | 102.021 | 108.447 | -5.028 | +2950 | -3819 | 29.7%44 | -2863 | 50.0%31 | 32.2%23 | 65.5%4 |
| 23-24 | 16-17 | #218 | -5.234 | 103.535 | 108.739 | -3.241 | -2335 | -1336 | 31.2%70 | -3669 | 50.2%37 | 34.5%59 | 66.9%10 |
| 22-23 | 14-19 | #221 | -1.946 | 102.834 | 104.857 | -3.233 | +8371 | -542 | 31.0%69 | -449 | 50.3%41 | 33.4%38 | 69.0%22 |
| 21-22 | 16-17 | #192 | -2.642 | 104.551 | 107.132 | -0.261 | -244 | -244 | 25.5%23 | +4124 | 53.1%84 | 35.1%72 | 77.0%95 |
| 19-20 | 17-15 | #197 | -2.044 | 101.341 | 103.346 | -2.741 | +13985 | +855 | 31.1%76 | +5414 | 51.5%69 | 35.9%86 | 72.2%63 |
| 18-19 | 11-20 | #189 | -1.149 | 104.345 | 105.448 | 0.463 | -3434 | -619 | 29.2%56 | -3569 | 51.6%59 | 34.4%49 | 68.8%31 |
| 17-18 | 19-15 | #140 | 2.559 | 114.086 | 111.416 | -3.230 | +18490 | -2930 | 31.6%74 | +2729 | 55.1%91 | 38.3%89 | 76.0%90 |
| 16-17 | 15-17 | #162 | 2.059 | 109.879 | 107.930 | -0.361 | +17591 | -2828 | 35.0%92 | +3927 | 51.2%55 | 35.0%51 | 78.2%99 |
| 15-16 | 16-16 | #172 | -0.353 | 104.753 | 104.949 | -4.126 | +28697 | -972 | 37.1%95 | +5914 | 49.8%44 | 34.3%47 | 73.1%85 |
| 14-15 | 17-16 | #163 | 0.755 | 104.863 | 104.145 | -4.123 | +3859 | -5018 | 33.4%70 | -4775 | 49.7%57 | 34.7%55 | 68.8%46 |
| 13-1414 | 24-9 | #75 | 10.983 | 112.587 | 101.673 | -4.229 | +14886 | +5485 | 34.0%73 | -3267 | 54.7%95 | 38.4%89 | 73.6%87 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
54.1%#158
Effective FG %
51.0%#157
3-Point %
33.8%#202
3PAR
37.9%#188
FTAR
35.7%#94
Assist %
48.8%#262
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
46.1%#5
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
16.0%#20
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
21 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0252D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.763441.3% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.224931.5% of shots
Late 21s+1.185627.3% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0628Allowed, D-I 1.02
Early 0–10s0.824548.5% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.341430.1% of shots
Late 21s+1.204021.4% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 352 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 18-19. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 18-19. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.