Miami OH23-9

MACCoach: Travis Steele

23-9NET#147

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Peter Suder	1,582	551	74.2%	+2.460	+0.856	−1.658	+0.656	−0.944	+0.246	−0.848	+1.928	+4.690	+1.068	+7.114
Eian Elmer	1,429	704	67.0%	+3.766	−0.846	−4.574	+0.252	+1.766	+1.132	−2.040	+0.938	+0.960	+4.096	−2.162
Kam Craft	1,373	759	64.4%	−6.128	−5.922	+0.248	−5.48	+6.896	+0.246	−13.64	+2.622	−0.646	+2.890	−2.866
Mekhi Cooper	1,254	879	58.8%	+0.854	−5.126	−5.878	−2.724	+1.162	+1.034	+0.152	−1.566	−3.520	+3.494	−3.066
Antwone Woolfolk	1,118	1,015	52.4%	+1.256	−9.212	−10.492	−3.916	−0.844	+1.330	−8.810	−3.482	+1.364	+1.980	−5.076
Evan Ipsaro	1,114	1,019	52.2%	+8.180	+11.094	+2.932	+4.490	−0.546	−1.268	+19.2100	−3.382	−2.030	−3.68	+10.28
Brant Byers	975	1,158	45.7%	−0.748	+1.458	+2.038	+1.060	−1.836	−0.658	+2.366	+0.938	+1.264	−1.034	−3.568
Reece Potter	851	1,282	39.9%	+4.468	+11.396	+6.916	+4.088	+1.464	−2.886	+4.878	+0.938	−4.016	−1.330	−0.250
Luke Skaljac	685	1,448	32.1%	−6.826	−0.350	+6.518	+2.678	−6.08	−0.252	−4.428	+2.622	+2.374	−3.010	−3.066
Dan Luers	129	2,004	6.1%	+9.584	+15.7100	+6.118	+7.498	+1.162	−3.088	+5.078	−5.694	−7.36	−5.72	+12.26
Jackson Kotecki	121	2,012	5.7%	−21.44	−7.716	+13.72	−3.518	+1.364	+2.516	−1.742	+7.12	+5.494	−3.96	+6.816

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Peter Suder	1,582	551	74.2%	5.756	111.054	105.254	55.4%68	27.8%38	17.6%42	27.6%42	51.8%44	70.7%58	19.3%66	35.1%34
Eian Elmer	1,429	704	67.0%	6.358	110.552	104.156	55.3%68	28.6%42	17.9%40	27.1%42	51.6%46	69.8%54	20.3%72	32.5%40
Kam Craft	1,373	759	64.4%	2.952	108.648	105.754	53.4%60	30.3%48	17.6%42	23.2%28	52.2%42	69.2%52	20.0%70	32.2%42
Mekhi Cooper	1,254	879	58.8%	5.456	108.748	103.360	54.1%62	28.5%40	17.9%40	27.8%44	50.7%50	68.0%46	20.4%72	32.0%42
Antwone Woolfolk	1,118	1,015	52.4%	5.656	106.442	100.766	53.4%60	27.7%38	18.2%38	23.6%30	49.7%56	70.1%56	19.9%70	30.8%44
Evan Ipsaro	1,114	1,019	52.2%	8.962	116.066	107.050	57.4%76	27.8%38	17.0%46	37.3%68	49.7%56	68.5%48	17.3%52	38.1%26
Brant Byers	975	1,158	45.7%	4.856	111.556	106.750	55.7%70	27.1%34	17.2%44	29.1%46	51.8%44	70.1%56	18.4%60	31.3%44
Reece Potter	851	1,282	39.9%	7.760	117.570	109.842	57.6%78	28.9%42	15.9%56	30.7%52	51.8%44	67.0%42	18.2%58	33.1%38
Luke Skaljac	685	1,448	32.1%	0.548	110.552	110.042	57.0%74	23.9%24	17.4%44	24.8%34	53.0%38	71.0%60	16.9%48	31.2%44
Dan Luers	129	2,004	6.1%	14.170	125.584	111.438	62.2%90	29.0%42	14.7%64	32.4%58	46.0%70	62.7%26	13.6%26	44.6%16
Jackson Kotecki	121	2,012	5.7%	-15.124	103.536	118.524	51.9%52	29.2%44	19.9%26	26.2%38	57.9%18	74.6%74	15.3%36	39.6%24

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Peter Suder	1,582	551	74.2%	3.352	110.152	106.850	54.8%66	28.7%42	17.4%44	28.4%44	49.9%54	66.1%38	18.3%58	28.0%54
Eian Elmer	1,429	704	67.0%	2.752	111.354	108.646	55.1%66	26.9%34	16.8%48	29.1%46	50.7%50	68.9%50	16.3%44	34.6%36
Kam Craft	1,373	759	64.4%	9.162	114.662	105.554	58.8%82	23.5%22	17.4%44	36.9%68	49.6%56	69.8%54	17.2%50	35.0%34
Mekhi Cooper	1,254	879	58.8%	4.654	113.760	109.144	56.8%74	27.4%36	16.9%46	27.7%42	52.2%42	71.5%62	17.0%48	35.0%34
Antwone Woolfolk	1,118	1,015	52.4%	4.454	115.666	111.138	57.3%76	28.5%40	16.8%48	32.4%58	53.0%38	68.8%48	18.0%56	35.8%32
Evan Ipsaro	1,114	1,019	52.2%	0.948	105.040	104.156	53.0%58	28.3%40	18.2%38	18.2%16	53.0%38	70.5%56	20.8%74	27.9%54
Brant Byers	975	1,158	45.7%	5.456	110.152	104.756	54.8%66	28.8%42	17.8%40	26.7%40	50.8%50	68.9%50	19.5%66	34.8%34
Reece Potter	851	1,282	39.9%	3.352	106.242	102.960	53.6%60	27.5%36	18.6%34	25.8%38	50.9%50	71.1%60	19.5%66	33.3%38
Luke Skaljac	685	1,448	32.1%	7.360	110.854	103.558	54.4%64	29.9%46	17.6%42	29.2%48	50.4%50	68.7%48	20.0%70	34.2%36
Dan Luers	129	2,004	6.1%	4.554	109.852	105.354	54.8%66	28.0%38	17.7%42	27.5%42	51.6%46	70.0%54	19.3%66	32.4%40
Jackson Kotecki	121	2,012	5.7%	6.458	111.254	104.856	55.4%68	28.0%38	17.4%44	27.9%44	50.9%50	69.2%50	19.2%64	32.8%40

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.