Schedule
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
LL
L
WW
LLW
W
WL
WL
WLL
WWWWWLLLWWLLLLWWLLWWWLWLWLLTeam Stats
28 games- Net Rating-2.442
- Offensive Rating101.323
- Defensive Rating103.871
- Pace68.570
- Effective FG%48.1%27
- Off Rebound Pct30.5%75
- Turnover Pct19.0%64
- FT Attempt Rate31.3%50
Team Stats
28 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating-2.442
- Offensive Rating101.323
- Defensive Rating103.871
- Pace68.570
- Effective FG%48.1%27
- Off Rebound Pct30.5%75
- Turnover Pct19.0%64
- FT Attempt Rate31.3%50
Results & Margin
- Win Pct53.6%60
- Point Margin / Game-1.741
- Points / Game69.444
- Points Allowed / Game71.147
- 1st Half Margin0.151
- 2nd Half Margin-1.730
- Avg Largest Lead11.464
- Avg Largest Deficit11.045
Box Score
- Points / Game69.444
- Rebounds / Game37.482
- Assists / Game15.994
- ORebs / Game10.974
- DRebs / Game26.679
- Steals / Game4.55
- Blocks / Game4.794
- Turnovers / Game13.052
- PFs / Game19.89
Shooting
- FGMs / Game24.945
- FGAs / Game58.462
- Field Goal Pct42.6%32
- 2PMs / Game18.562
- 2PAs / Game38.675
- 2-Point Pct48.1%31
- 3PMs / Game6.426
- 3PAs / Game19.831
- 3-Point Pct32.1%28
- FTMs / Game13.358
- FTAs / Game18.352
- Free Throw Pct72.7%69
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s53.4%75
- % Pts from 3s27.5%25
- % Pts from FTs19.1%62
- Paint Pts / Game10.713
- % Pts in Paint15.4%14
- Fast Break Pts / Game4.744
- % Pts on Fast Break6.7%44
- Points off TOVs / Game5.02
- % Pts off TOVs7.2%3
- 1st Half Pts / Game32.749
- 2nd Half Pts / Game36.648
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %52.3%31
- Points / Shot1.1933
- 3-Point Att Rate33.9%26
- Assist Pct63.7%99
- Assists / 100 Poss23.185
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.22x86
- PF Drawn / Game17.963
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%48.1%76
- Opp True Shooting %52.7%68
- Opp Field Goal Pct42.6%67
- Opp 2-Point Pct48.0%69
- Opp 3-Point Pct32.1%76
- Opp 3PA Rate33.7%81
- Opp FT Att Rate36.9%15
- Opp Points / Shot1.2349
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game71.147
- Paint Pts Allowed12.680
- Fast Break Pts Allowed3.480
- Pts off TOVs Allowed7.688
- Opp Assist Pct53.5%39
- TOVs Forced / Game10.54
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct73.7%69
- Turnovers Forced Pct15.4%3
- Steal Pct6.5%2
- Block Pct6.9%90
- Hakeem Pct13.4%33
- PF Efficiency1.11x17
- Steals / PF0.23x1
- Blocks / PF0.24x83
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 347 D-I teams- #5AST%63.7%
- #17SOS10.6
- #50REB Diff+89
- #70Adj DRtg98.0
- #80Opp 3P%32.1%
- #82Opp eFG%48.1%
- #87OREB%30.5%
- #106Opp OREB%26.3%
Where they rank bestof 347 D-I teams
- #5AST%63.7%
- #17SOS10.6
- #50REB Diff+89
- #70Adj DRtg98.0
- #80Opp 3P%32.1%
- #82Opp eFG%48.1%
- #87OREB%30.5%
- #106Opp OREB%26.3%
Where they rank worstof 347 D-I teams
- #334Opp TOV%15.4%
- #256eFG%48.1%
- #2493P%32.1%
- #236TS%51.8%
- #217Pts Diff-47
- #175FTAR31.3%
- #164TOV%19.0%
- #1583PM Diff+2
Most Similar Seasons
to 2020-21- 1
UNLV 2013-1420-13MWCMost alike in Adj O, OREB%, Opp TOV%93 - 2
Georgia TechGa. Tech 2013-1416-17ACCMost alike in eFG%, Opp eFG%, 3PA rate86 - 3Ohio St. 2015-1621-14Big 10Most alike in Adj O, FT rate, 3PA rate86
- 4Georgia TechGa. Tech 2024-2517-17ACCMost alike in Opp OREB%, Opp eFG%, Adj D86
- 5
Texas A&M 2017-1819-13SECMost alike in Opp TOV%, Opp OREB%, 3PA rate85 - 6
Colorado 2014-1516-18Pac 12Most alike in Adj O, OREB%, Adj D84 - 7
Alabama 2018-1918-16SECMost alike in Opp eFG%, Adj D, OREB%84 - 8Colorado 2017-1817-15Pac 12Most alike in FT rate, Opp TOV%, Adj D84
- 9Colorado 2015-1621-12Pac 12Most alike in 3PA rate, eFG%, Adj O84
- 10
Utah 2022-2317-15Pac 12Most alike in Adj O, TOV%, OREB%83
Schedule
Loading the schedule
| F. LoyerFoster Loyer | Jr | 6'0" | +1.694 | – | – | 50.0%35 | 15.1%30 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 32.7% | 88.0% |
| A. HenryAaron Henry | Jr | 6'6" | +1.593 | – | – | 52.5%46 | 26.9%93 | 15.4 | 5.6 | 3.6 | 29.6% | 76.2% |
| G. BrownGabe Brown | Jr | 6'7" | +1.391 | – | – | 61.5%82 | 14.3%25 | 7.2 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 42.0% | 88.2% |
| M. HallMalik Hall | So | 6'7" | +1.390 | – | – | 58.9%74 | 15.9%35 | 5.0 | 4.2 | 1.3 | 36.4% | 69.5% |
| J. HauserJoey Hauser | Jr | 6'9" | +1.083 | – | – | 59.5%76 | 23.2%82 | 9.7 | 5.6 | 1.4 | 34.0% | 72.1% |
| J. LangfordJoshua Langford | Sr | 6'5" | +0.774 | – | – | 48.5%30 | 19.9%64 | 9.8 | 3.6 | 1.8 | 34.3% | 75.4% |
| R. WattsRocket Watts | So | 6'2" | +0.152 | – | – | 41.4%15 | 23.3%82 | 7.6 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 25.3% | 76.9% |
| T. KithierThomas Kithier | Jr | 6'8" | – | – | – | 67.8%91 | 12.0%15 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 0.0% | 76.9% |
| M. Bingham Jr.Marcus Bingham Jr. | Jr | 6'11" | – | – | – | 57.2%67 | 15.4%32 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 73.8% |
| J. HoibergJack Hoiberg | Jr | 5'11" | – | – | – | 21.8%6 | 20.7%69 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0% | 42.9% |
| J. Marble IIJulius Marble II | So | 6'8" | – | – | – | 62.1%83 | 20.7%69 | 4.0 | 2.1 | 0.1 | 100.0% | 68.4% |
| S. IzzoSteven Izzo | So | 5'8" | – | – | – | 0.0%2 | 29.0%96 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| M. SissokoMady Sissoko | Fr | 6'9" | – | – | – | 56.2%62 | 11.7%14 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 43.8% |
| D. SmithDavis Smith | Fr | 6'1" | – | – | – | 0.0%2 | 8.8%7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| A.J. Hoggard | Fr | 6'3" | – | – | – | 37.2%11 | 17.9%49 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 16.7% | 60.0% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-263 | 27-8 | #11 | 25.597 | 121.692 | 96.197 | 13.898 | +39799 | -3326 | 37.8%97 | +5217 | 53.8%76 | 36.3%87 | 76.3%88 |
| 24-252 | 30-7 | #11 | 24.797 | 118.693 | 93.898 | 12.594 | +32899 | -2231 | 35.3%88 | +1237 | 50.9%44 | 31.1%11 | 77.9%94 |
| 23-249 | 20-15 | #18 | 18.995 | 114.186 | 95.298 | 11.798 | +3956 | -3624 | 29.8%55 | -8288 | 51.6%59 | 36.3%86 | 70.8%35 |
| 22-237 | 21-13 | #37 | 14.290 | 112.687 | 98.487 | 11.699 | +10377 | +751 | 27.6%36 | +3724 | 51.7%61 | 39.3%99 | 75.9%90 |
| 21-227 | 23-13 | #41 | 13.688 | 111.688 | 98.083 | 10.797 | +15084 | +853 | 30.7%70 | +869 | 52.0%71 | 37.8%95 | 75.0%81 |
| 19-20 | 22-9 | #4 | 23.499 | 114.697 | 91.297 | 10.298 | +23197 | +3672 | 32.8%90 | +4816 | 52.6%84 | 34.8%72 | 75.0%85 |
| 18-192 | 32-7 | #4 | 28.599 | 120.599 | 91.998 | 12.699 | +34499 | +3969 | 33.9%90 | +959 | 55.2%93 | 37.8%91 | 75.3%91 |
| 17-183 | 30-5 | #5 | 26.299 | 120.498 | 94.299 | 7.586 | +361100 | +4679 | 37.0%99 | +1094 | 56.8%96 | 40.1%97 | 74.5%83 |
| 16-179 | 20-15 | #44 | 13.987 | 110.581 | 96.689 | 11.296 | +12380 | +4476 | 29.2%46 | +1103 | 54.0%88 | 37.3%80 | 67.0%20 |
| 15-162 | 29-6 | #2 | 27.5100 | 121.8100 | 94.396 | 7.082 | +399100 | +11798 | 37.1%95 | +819 | 56.3%98 | 43.4%100 | 72.9%82 |
| 14-157 | 27-12 | #17 | 20.095 | 113.695 | 93.593 | 11.299 | +21193 | +7089 | 33.4%69 | +2534 | 53.2%88 | 38.5%91 | 63.2%4 |
| 13-144 | 29-9 | #8 | 23.098 | 118.197 | 95.195 | 10.699 | +19292 | +5584 | 32.9%62 | -953 | 54.5%94 | 39.2%94 | 70.7%56 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
51.8%#236
Effective FG %
48.1%#256
3-Point %
32.1%#248
3PAR
33.9%#257
FTAR
31.3%#174
Assist %
63.7%#5
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
26.2%#333
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
40.6%#339
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
14 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9728D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s0.851640.4% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.085931.1% of shots
Late 21s+1.016128.5% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot0.9579Allowed, D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s0.897440.7% of shots
Middle 11–20s0.997634.9% of shots
Late 21s+1.004424.4% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 334 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 20-21. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 20-21. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.