Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Big 10
Michigan St. logo

Michigan St.

27-8NET#11Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #24Coach: Tom Izzo
Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Jeremy Fears Jr.+14.2+3.8−10.4+1.6−5.9−2.9+6.6−6.4+1.6−1.3−4.6
Coen Carr−4.4+1.6+6.0+1.2−4.6−1.4+7.1+2.3−3.1−2.4−11.4
Jaxon Kohler+15.9+6.2−9.7+0.6+5.0−0.1+2.2−5.7+1.0+0.4−2.5
Carson Cooper−6.2−7.1−0.9−1.7−0.9+3.5+9.9+0.1+3.7−1.4−8.3
Jordan Scott+4.3+2.0−2.3−2.3+2.0−3.1−1.4−1.4+0.8+0.9+11.9
Kur Teng+15.0+6.0−9.0−0.4+8.9−0.6−7.6−5.0+2.3+1.8+4.2
Cam Ward+0.9+2.2+1.3+3.2−0.9−1.0−10.1+2.9−0.5+1.4−0.5
Divine Ugochukwu+3.4+1.3−2.1+0.4+1.6+0.4+9.1−1.4−0.0+0.7+1.7
Trey Fort−22.3−9.2+13.1−0.0−6.3+3.4−4.7+7.2−2.8−0.7+2.0
Jesse McCulloch−16.9−12.3+4.6−4.9−7.6+0.6−2.6+0.4−3.0−0.6+5.5
Denham Wojcik−14.6−0.6+14.0−0.4+8.2+2.6−4.2+9.5+0.6+0.5+1.8

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Jeremy Fears Jr.17.3117.6100.454.1%36.8%16.7%38.3%48.1%78.3%14.6%29.6%
Coen Carr13.4117.4104.054.2%36.6%16.9%39.0%49.9%77.2%14.2%27.5%
Jaxon Kohler19.7118.999.254.0%39.5%17.2%37.7%47.5%78.3%15.0%29.7%
Carson Cooper12.5114.6102.053.2%37.6%18.4%40.5%49.3%79.2%14.4%27.7%
Jordan Scott16.6117.9101.352.8%38.9%15.8%36.4%48.6%78.4%15.2%36.2%
Kur Teng23.1120.397.253.6%42.9%16.9%32.9%46.4%79.3%15.9%32.9%
Cam Ward15.2118.3103.155.8%37.4%16.6%30.7%51.1%77.7%15.7%30.2%
Divine Ugochukwu17.2117.9100.854.2%39.2%17.6%43.9%48.3%78.0%15.3%31.7%
Trey Fort-2.5109.9112.453.8%33.1%19.9%33.3%54.8%75.8%14.3%32.0%
Jesse McCulloch0.2106.5106.349.6%31.6%17.7%34.7%49.6%75.4%14.3%35.1%
Denham Wojcik1.8116.4114.653.5%45.1%19.6%33.3%57.7%78.5%15.2%32.0%

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Jeremy Fears Jr.3.1113.8110.852.5%42.7%19.6%31.6%54.6%76.7%15.9%34.2%
Coen Carr17.8115.798.053.0%41.3%18.3%31.9%47.6%80.3%16.5%38.9%
Jaxon Kohler3.7112.7108.953.4%34.5%17.4%35.5%53.2%77.3%14.6%32.2%
Carson Cooper18.7121.6102.954.9%38.6%15.0%30.7%49.3%75.6%15.8%36.1%
Jordan Scott12.3115.8103.555.1%36.9%18.9%37.8%50.1%77.6%14.4%24.3%
Kur Teng8.1114.3106.254.0%33.9%17.5%40.4%51.4%77.0%14.1%28.7%
Cam Ward14.3116.1101.852.6%38.3%17.6%40.8%48.3%78.2%14.3%30.6%
Divine Ugochukwu13.8116.6102.853.7%37.6%17.2%34.8%49.7%78.0%14.7%30.0%
Trey Fort19.8119.099.253.8%39.4%16.5%38.0%47.6%78.7%15.0%30.0%
Jesse McCulloch17.1118.8101.654.5%39.1%17.2%37.4%49.3%78.5%14.9%29.7%
Denham Wojcik16.4117.0100.653.9%36.9%17.0%37.5%48.2%77.9%14.8%30.3%
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.