Michigan St.27-8

Big 10Coach: Tom Izzo

27-8NET#11

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jeremy Fears Jr.	1,842	423	81.3%	+14.294	+3.872	−10.492	+1.668	−5.98	−2.988	+6.684	−6.494	+1.668	−1.328	−4.674
Coen Carr	1,646	619	72.7%	−4.434	+1.660	+6.018	+1.264	−4.614	−1.472	+7.186	+2.324	−3.122	−2.416	−11.494
Jaxon Kohler	1,556	708	68.7%	+15.996	+6.282	−9.792	+0.658	+5.090	−0.152	+2.264	−5.794	+1.062	+0.458	−2.564
Carson Cooper	1,502	762	66.3%	−6.228	−7.118	−0.954	−1.732	−0.942	+3.56	+9.994	+0.148	+3.786	−1.428	−8.388
Jordan Scott	1,209	1,056	53.4%	+4.368	+2.062	−2.362	−2.328	+2.072	−3.190	−1.444	−1.464	+0.860	+0.968	+11.94
Kur Teng	980	1,285	43.3%	+15.094	+6.082	−9.090	−0.446	+8.998	−0.658	−7.614	−5.090	+2.374	+1.880	+4.226
Cam Ward	823	1,442	36.3%	+0.954	+2.264	+1.342	+3.282	−0.942	−1.066	−10.18	+2.920	−0.544	+1.474	−0.552
Divine Ugochukwu	558	1,707	24.6%	+3.464	+1.358	−2.160	+0.456	+1.668	+0.442	+9.192	−1.464	−0.050	+0.764	+1.738
Trey Fort	522	1,742	23.1%	−22.34	−9.212	+13.12	−0.050	−6.38	+3.48	−4.726	+7.22	−2.824	−0.738	+2.038
Jesse McCulloch	338	1,927	14.9%	−16.96	−12.36	+4.624	−4.910	−7.64	+0.640	−2.636	+0.444	−3.022	−0.640	+5.520
Denham Wojcik	271	1,994	11.9%	−14.610	−0.648	+14.02	−0.446	+8.298	+2.612	−4.228	+9.50	+0.658	+0.560	+1.838

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jeremy Fears Jr.	1,842	423	81.3%	17.374	117.668	100.468	54.1%58	36.8%76	16.7%42	38.3%62	48.1%64	78.3%82	14.6%38	29.6%56
Coen Carr	1,646	619	72.7%	13.468	117.466	104.058	54.2%58	36.6%74	16.9%40	39.0%64	49.9%58	77.2%78	14.2%34	27.5%62
Jaxon Kohler	1,556	708	68.7%	19.778	118.970	99.270	54.0%58	39.5%84	17.2%38	37.7%60	47.5%66	78.3%82	15.0%42	29.7%56
Carson Cooper	1,502	762	66.3%	12.566	114.660	102.064	53.2%54	37.6%78	18.4%30	40.5%66	49.3%58	79.2%84	14.4%36	27.7%62
Jordan Scott	1,209	1,056	53.4%	16.674	117.968	101.366	52.8%52	38.9%82	15.8%50	36.4%58	48.6%62	78.4%82	15.2%44	36.2%38
Kur Teng	980	1,285	43.3%	23.182	120.374	97.274	53.6%56	42.9%90	16.9%40	32.9%48	46.4%70	79.3%84	15.9%48	32.9%46
Cam Ward	823	1,442	36.3%	15.272	118.370	103.160	55.8%66	37.4%76	16.6%42	30.7%42	51.1%50	77.7%80	15.7%46	30.2%54
Divine Ugochukwu	558	1,707	24.6%	17.274	117.968	100.866	54.2%58	39.2%82	17.6%36	43.9%74	48.3%62	78.0%82	15.3%44	31.7%50
Trey Fort	522	1,742	23.1%	-2.542	109.948	112.438	53.8%56	33.1%62	19.9%22	33.3%50	54.8%32	75.8%74	14.3%36	32.0%50
Jesse McCulloch	338	1,927	14.9%	0.246	106.540	106.352	49.6%36	31.6%56	17.7%34	34.7%54	49.6%58	75.4%72	14.3%36	35.1%40
Denham Wojcik	271	1,994	11.9%	1.848	116.464	114.632	53.5%56	45.1%94	19.6%22	33.3%50	57.7%22	78.5%82	15.2%44	32.0%50

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jeremy Fears Jr.	1,842	423	81.3%	3.150	113.858	110.842	52.5%52	42.7%90	19.6%22	31.6%46	54.6%34	76.7%76	15.9%48	34.2%44
Coen Carr	1,646	619	72.7%	17.876	115.762	98.072	53.0%52	41.3%88	18.3%32	31.9%46	47.6%66	80.3%88	16.5%52	38.9%32
Jaxon Kohler	1,556	708	68.7%	3.752	112.754	108.946	53.4%56	34.5%68	17.4%36	35.5%56	53.2%40	77.3%80	14.6%38	32.2%48
Carson Cooper	1,502	762	66.3%	18.776	121.676	102.962	54.9%62	38.6%82	15.0%56	30.7%42	49.3%58	75.6%74	15.8%48	36.1%38
Jordan Scott	1,209	1,056	53.4%	12.366	115.864	103.560	55.1%62	36.9%76	18.9%26	37.8%60	50.1%52	77.6%80	14.4%36	24.3%72
Kur Teng	980	1,285	43.3%	8.160	114.360	106.252	54.0%58	33.9%66	17.5%36	40.4%66	51.4%48	77.0%78	14.1%34	28.7%58
Cam Ward	823	1,442	36.3%	14.370	116.164	101.864	52.6%52	38.3%80	17.6%34	40.8%68	48.3%64	78.2%82	14.3%36	30.6%54
Divine Ugochukwu	558	1,707	24.6%	13.868	116.664	102.862	53.7%56	37.6%78	17.2%38	34.8%54	49.7%58	78.0%82	14.7%38	30.0%54
Trey Fort	522	1,742	23.1%	19.878	119.070	99.270	53.8%58	39.4%84	16.5%44	38.0%62	47.6%66	78.7%82	15.0%42	30.0%56
Jesse McCulloch	338	1,927	14.9%	17.174	118.870	101.664	54.5%60	39.1%82	17.2%38	37.4%60	49.3%58	78.5%82	14.9%40	29.7%56
Denham Wojcik	271	1,994	11.9%	16.474	117.066	100.666	53.9%58	36.9%76	17.0%40	37.5%60	48.2%64	77.9%80	14.8%40	30.3%54

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.