Northern Arizona14-16

Big SkyCoach: Shane Burcar

14-16NET#254

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Trent McLaughlin	1,844	116	94.1%	+15.194	+12.296	−2.966	−3.816	+12.5100	−9.298	−8.810	+6.44	−0.250	+9.0100	−10.092
Carson Towt	1,700	260	86.7%	+17.396	+6.082	−11.494	+1.972	+5.390	−3.492	−18.32	−2.778	+4.990	+0.764	−15.096
Jayden Jackson	1,585	375	80.9%	+19.698	+20.5100	+0.844	+2.880	+14.9100	−5.296	−1.742	−2.476	+0.456	−2.514	+8.012
Monty Bowser	957	1,002	48.9%	−9.020	−7.316	+1.640	−2.426	−5.510	+0.540	+0.154	+0.148	+0.354	−1.330	+4.624
Ryan Abelman	900	1,060	45.9%	+7.578	+11.196	+3.630	+5.394	+4.888	−0.558	−0.648	+1.730	−1.338	+0.966	+5.420
Diego Campisano	752	1,208	38.3%	+5.070	−2.238	−7.284	−2.130	−1.736	−0.862	+6.484	−2.978	+1.566	+1.270	−7.284
Oakland Fort	617	1,343	31.5%	−1.544	+0.454	+1.938	+2.374	−2.232	+1.330	−2.338	+0.740	−4.016	+0.356	−6.884
Dillan Baker	572	1,388	29.2%	−11.116	−5.922	+5.222	−1.832	−2.826	+2.120	+3.974	+4.112	−3.320	+2.890	+7.214
Leigh Rickwood-Pitt	454	1,506	23.2%	−3.338	−7.318	−4.070	+1.668	−8.52	+3.96	+6.082	−4.186	+1.162	−0.936	+3.630
Jack Wistrcill	220	1,740	11.2%	−30.82	−14.74	+16.10	−6.26	−1.636	−0.050	−0.648	+6.44	−1.238	−3.210	+2.934
Ali Ragab	164	1,796	8.4%	+5.070	−0.150	−5.176	+0.960	+2.676	+3.76	−4.826	−2.978	+2.778	−4.24	−8.990

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Trent McLaughlin	1,844	116	94.1%	-0.646	109.952	110.540	50.3%46	34.0%64	15.0%62	28.1%44	54.0%34	73.8%72	15.8%40	32.4%40
Carson Towt	1,700	260	86.7%	0.748	109.952	109.244	50.7%46	34.1%64	15.1%62	26.4%38	53.3%36	74.5%74	15.4%38	31.2%44
Jayden Jackson	1,585	375	80.9%	2.250	113.160	110.840	51.0%48	36.2%70	14.5%66	28.2%44	53.1%38	73.9%72	14.8%34	34.7%36
Monty Bowser	957	1,002	48.9%	-6.136	105.440	111.538	49.2%38	30.6%50	15.8%56	28.6%46	53.7%36	74.0%74	14.6%32	35.4%34
Ryan Abelman	900	1,060	45.9%	2.552	115.164	112.636	53.3%60	36.2%70	15.2%60	28.2%44	54.5%32	73.1%70	15.8%40	36.0%32
Diego Campisano	752	1,208	38.3%	1.750	107.846	106.152	49.2%38	32.4%56	15.0%62	32.5%58	51.8%44	74.7%76	16.0%42	28.5%52
Oakland Fort	617	1,343	31.5%	-2.542	109.450	112.036	52.1%54	32.0%54	16.4%52	26.9%40	54.1%34	71.2%60	15.5%38	28.5%52
Dillan Baker	572	1,388	29.2%	-9.430	105.040	114.432	49.2%38	31.5%52	17.0%46	31.3%54	56.6%24	71.4%60	17.3%52	38.3%26
Leigh Rickwood-Pitt	454	1,506	23.2%	-4.140	103.536	107.648	51.7%52	26.7%34	18.5%36	33.2%58	50.5%50	74.7%74	14.6%32	35.8%32
Jack Wistrcill	220	1,740	11.2%	-28.910	96.120	125.014	45.0%22	32.0%56	15.5%58	28.0%44	59.3%14	72.7%66	12.5%18	35.6%32
Ali Ragab	164	1,796	8.4%	3.152	109.150	106.052	51.3%50	35.9%70	18.9%34	24.2%32	51.0%48	76.3%82	11.4%14	25.0%64

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Trent McLaughlin	1,844	116	94.1%	-15.822	97.624	113.434	54.2%62	21.6%18	24.2%10	36.9%68	47.6%64	74.0%74	6.9%4	42.5%20
Carson Towt	1,700	260	86.7%	-16.622	104.036	120.620	48.8%38	28.8%42	18.5%36	44.7%82	56.0%26	69.6%54	14.7%32	46.2%14
Jayden Jackson	1,585	375	80.9%	-17.420	92.616	110.042	48.2%34	21.3%16	19.7%28	29.9%50	55.6%26	73.5%70	17.3%52	26.6%58
Monty Bowser	957	1,002	48.9%	2.852	112.758	109.942	51.7%52	36.2%70	15.3%60	28.4%44	53.6%36	73.7%72	15.9%42	30.8%44
Ryan Abelman	900	1,060	45.9%	-5.038	104.038	109.044	48.1%34	31.4%52	15.8%56	28.8%46	52.8%40	74.4%74	14.9%34	30.6%46
Diego Campisano	752	1,208	38.3%	-3.442	110.052	113.334	51.3%50	34.1%64	15.8%56	26.1%38	54.7%30	73.3%70	14.9%34	35.8%32
Oakland Fort	617	1,343	31.5%	-1.146	109.050	110.142	49.8%40	34.1%64	15.1%62	29.2%48	53.4%36	75.1%78	15.2%36	35.4%34
Dillan Baker	572	1,388	29.2%	1.750	110.954	109.244	51.0%48	34.3%64	14.9%64	27.4%42	52.5%40	74.7%74	14.5%32	31.1%44
Leigh Rickwood-Pitt	454	1,506	23.2%	-0.846	110.854	111.638	50.2%46	35.2%68	14.6%66	27.3%42	54.6%32	73.5%72	15.5%38	32.2%42
Jack Wistrcill	220	1,740	11.2%	1.950	110.854	108.944	51.2%48	33.6%62	15.5%58	28.6%46	52.9%38	74.0%74	15.7%40	32.8%40
Ali Ragab	164	1,796	8.4%	-2.044	109.150	111.138	50.4%46	33.2%58	15.2%60	28.9%46	53.9%34	73.6%72	15.7%40	33.9%38

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Northern ArizonaNAU14-16

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Northern Arizona14-16