Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Northern Kentucky logoNorthern Kentucky logoNorthern Kentucky logoNorthern Kentucky logo

Northern Kentucky17-14

HorizonCoach: Darrin Horn

17-14NET#171

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Donovan Oday+22.0100+17.5100−4.474+6.698−1.538−5.498+14.098−2.878+1.668+0.660+8.212
Dan Gherezgher−5.132+3.370+8.410+0.152+5.892+1.526−3.930+3.316−4.514−1.822+1.938
LJ Wells+14.794+11.596−3.266+9.0100+2.374+1.820+6.784+1.038+0.658+2.588−9.892
Tae Dozier−1.844+3.168+4.922+0.456+3.984+0.246+2.064+0.246−8.74+1.474+1.838
Ethan Elliott−0.450−5.522−5.278−0.644−6.38−0.862−5.224−3.986+4.088−1.624−15.198
Kael Robinson+0.854−4.428−5.278−2.822−3.918−1.268−4.528−3.382+3.484−2.020−1.560
Donovan Rakotonanahary−5.828−0.448+5.420−2.326+4.888+0.344−0.748+4.610−2.228+2.688+10.66
Shawn Nelson−11.116−9.212+1.938−2.822+3.180+3.96−3.930+4.012+4.992+0.458+12.34
Bryce Darbyshire−1.544−12.96−11.594−4.214−4.016+3.48+11.196−1.262+11.9100+3.494−1.660
Ryan Tolliver−12.812−7.716+5.122−5.48−4.912−2.182−10.28−1.262+1.162−6.02−1.358
Addison Archer−22.34−14.84+7.512−7.84−4.316+0.246−9.010+0.148−13.52−1.032−7.284

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Donovan Oday8.962117.466108.54854.9%6231.9%5815.0%5639.5%6453.2%4069.1%4618.8%6839.9%30
Dan Gherezgher2.150113.958111.84053.3%5433.8%6616.7%4235.0%5454.8%3267.4%3818.2%6438.2%34
LJ Wells7.158115.964108.84655.6%6633.0%6216.8%4037.7%6054.2%3668.8%4419.3%7235.2%40
Tae Dozier3.050113.958110.94253.3%5433.3%6216.4%4436.4%5854.0%3666.5%3219.0%7038.2%34
Ethan Elliott3.352111.252107.84853.0%5430.2%5216.1%4834.1%5252.7%4269.9%4818.1%6432.7%46
Kael Robinson3.852111.352107.55052.2%5030.8%5415.9%4834.2%5252.6%4270.0%4817.8%6237.1%36
Donovan Rakotonanahary-0.644112.856113.43651.6%4635.8%7216.6%4235.4%5657.2%2467.0%3820.5%7845.3%20
Shawn Nelson-5.436105.738111.14051.0%4434.8%6819.5%2432.8%4857.1%2472.6%6218.9%7047.6%16
Bryce Darbyshire2.150101.42899.37049.4%3628.7%4619.4%2446.1%7652.8%4279.5%8621.7%8436.3%38
Ryan Tolliver-8.132106.138114.23448.3%3227.9%4214.4%6026.7%3252.8%4269.6%4813.2%2836.5%38
Addison Archer-17.32099.324116.62846.0%2428.4%4416.6%4427.5%3454.1%3656.3%817.7%6231.1%52

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Donovan Oday-13.02699.926112.93648.3%3233.4%6620.4%1825.5%2856.0%2867.4%3818.2%6631.7%50
Dan Gherezgher7.258110.650103.46053.2%5427.9%4215.3%5438.9%6451.4%4871.9%5820.0%7636.3%38
LJ Wells-7.534104.434112.04046.6%2630.7%5215.0%5630.9%4453.2%4068.2%4216.8%5445.0%20
Tae Dozier4.854110.850106.05452.9%5229.4%4816.2%4634.4%5453.8%3875.2%7217.6%6036.4%38
Ethan Elliott3.752116.766113.03653.7%5636.5%7416.9%4039.3%6456.5%2665.9%3219.7%7447.9%16
Kael Robinson3.150115.862112.73855.0%6234.7%6817.1%3838.7%6255.9%2866.6%3219.8%7438.6%32
Donovan Rakotonanahary5.254113.256108.04853.9%5831.0%5416.3%4636.1%5852.6%4269.3%4617.8%6234.7%42
Shawn Nelson5.756115.060109.24653.8%5631.7%5815.6%5236.7%5853.1%4067.7%4018.6%6835.3%40
Bryce Darbyshire3.652114.360110.84253.6%5632.7%6216.1%4834.9%5454.0%3667.6%3818.3%6637.9%34
Ryan Tolliver4.654113.858109.14653.8%5632.8%6216.6%4436.9%6054.0%3668.5%4419.2%7237.9%34
Addison Archer5.154114.158109.14653.8%5632.7%6016.4%4436.6%5853.9%3669.7%4818.7%6838.3%34
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.