Horizon

Oakland

16-18NET#194Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #184Coach: Greg Kampe

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,153	1,107	-3.5—	108.2—	111.7—	50.2%—	36.3%—	18.4%—	30.5%—	51.5%—	65.2%—	16.8%—	27.4%—
NaivaluruaT. NaivaluruaColeD. ColeWoodrichJ. WoodrichMukebaA. MukebaI. JonesI. Jones	276	162	10.8—	112.0—	101.3—	52.0%—	44.1%—	20.3%—	27.0%—	50.0%—	71.1%—	17.1%—	24.8%—
NaivaluruaT. NaivaluruaColeD. ColeChristieM. ChristieMukebaA. MukebaI. JonesI. Jones	136	76	2.7—	108.2—	105.4—	49.2%—	40.8%—	19.1%—	19.4%—	51.7%—	73.2%—	16.2%—	19.7%—
NaivaluruaT. NaivaluruaColeD. ColeChristieM. ChristieJ. JonesJ. JonesMukebaA. Mukeba	99	51	-37.4—	100.0—	137.3—	44.8%—	29.0%—	11.1%—	19.6%—	61.6%—	54.7%—	13.7%—	14.1%—
NaivaluruaT. NaivaluruaColeD. ColeWoodrichJ. WoodrichJ. JonesJ. JonesMukebaA. Mukeba	99	53	-3.8—	103.3—	107.1—	46.5%—	39.7%—	16.2%—	12.0%—	50.0%—	57.6%—	21.0%—	24.7%—
NaivaluruaT. NaivaluruaColeD. ColeMashhourN. MashhourMukebaA. MukebaI. JonesI. Jones	86	42	19.4—	111.5—	92.0—	53.1%—	33.3%—	19.7%—	55.4%—	43.9%—	71.2%—	18.8%—	15.9%—
MajakD. MajakNaivaluruaT. NaivaluruaColeD. ColeWoodrichJ. WoodrichMashhourN. Mashhour	66	41	28.9—	114.2—	85.3—	48.6%—	52.3%—	21.3%—	17.4%—	42.7%—	71.4%—	20.9%—	9.7%—
NaivaluruaT. NaivaluruaColeD. ColeWoodrichJ. WoodrichCraggsC. CraggsMukebaA. Mukeba	63	35	20.4—	102.1—	81.7—	54.9%—	29.0%—	23.9%—	23.5%—	45.5%—	82.4%—	21.6%—	7.3%—
NaivaluruaT. NaivaluruaColeD. ColeWoodrichJ. WoodrichMashhourN. MashhourMukebaA. Mukeba	58	29	-17.1—	105.0—	122.0—	60.5%—	25.0%—	24.1%—	34.9%—	56.4%—	77.4%—	9.9%—	25.5%—
NaivaluruaT. NaivaluruaColeD. ColeWoodrichJ. WoodrichChristieM. ChristieMukebaA. Mukeba	44	23	-71.3—	79.9—	151.2—	39.7%—	34.6%—	22.8%—	20.5%—	63.1%—	61.9%—	6.9%—	33.3%—
NaivaluruaT. NaivaluruaColeD. ColeMukebaA. MukebaHothJ. HothI. JonesI. Jones	44	26	18.5—	112.3—	93.7—	50.0%—	48.1%—	25.2%—	35.9%—	40.2%—	65.5%—	18.3%—	24.4%—
ColeD. ColeCraggsC. CraggsChristieM. ChristieJ. JonesJ. JonesMukebaA. Mukeba	42	20	23.1—	136.5—	113.4—	64.1%—	47.4%—	16.8%—	25.6%—	46.4%—	58.6%—	12.9%—	19.0%—
NaivaluruaT. NaivaluruaChristieM. ChristieJ. JonesJ. JonesMukebaA. MukebaI. JonesI. Jones	42	22	-22.5—	98.4—	120.9—	51.7%—	36.4%—	31.2%—	46.7%—	45.1%—	51.9%—	15.1%—	29.3%—
NaivaluruaT. NaivaluruaWoodrichJ. WoodrichChristieM. ChristieJ. JonesJ. JonesMukebaA. Mukeba	38	17	-9.1—	105.1—	114.2—	56.0%—	21.4%—	21.0%—	68.0%—	53.4%—	61.1%—	21.0%—	31.0%—
NaivaluruaT. NaivaluruaMashhourN. MashhourJ. JonesJ. JonesMukebaA. MukebaI. JonesI. Jones	34	17	8.3—	113.1—	104.8—	56.3%—	28.6%—	17.9%—	66.7%—	59.3%—	71.4%—	24.7%—	11.1%—
ColeD. ColeChristieM. ChristieJ. JonesJ. JonesMukebaA. MukebaI. JonesI. Jones	31	15	-9.3—	110.5—	119.9—	51.7%—	36.4%—	16.3%—	34.5%—	48.1%—	53.3%—	18.9%—	44.4%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.