Oakland15-18

HorizonCoach: Greg Kampe

15-18NET#188

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tuburu Naivalurua	1,664	426	79.6%	−0.050	−3.334	−3.368	+0.758	−3.224	+1.528	−2.238	+2.226	+7.998	−1.034	−6.782
Allen Mukeba	1,591	500	76.1%	+12.190	+1.358	−10.894	+1.870	+6.996	+2.020	−10.56	−1.868	+5.994	+0.662	−17.698
DQ Cole	1,569	521	75.1%	+5.170	−0.250	−5.376	+0.758	+1.666	+0.148	−8.112	−2.374	+4.990	−1.330	−3.568
Isaiah Jones	1,124	967	53.7%	+20.598	+7.386	−13.296	+1.366	+8.898	+2.714	+7.388	−3.684	+0.454	+4.598	−1.960
Jayson Woodrich	1,004	1,087	48.0%	−3.140	−4.528	−1.456	−1.634	−1.142	−0.964	−8.112	+0.742	+4.992	−1.034	+3.232
Jaylen Jones	965	1,126	46.2%	−1.644	+3.470	+5.024	+1.770	−1.538	−2.382	−1.742	+1.632	−4.612	+0.764	+3.232
Malcolm Christie	912	1,179	43.6%	−23.74	−4.328	+19.30	−3.816	−1.340	−1.672	−3.630	+5.94	−9.72	−1.428	−0.954
Nassim Mashhour	661	1,430	31.6%	+4.568	+1.458	−3.266	+2.678	−9.12	−0.964	+17.4100	−2.374	+1.566	+0.254	+3.330
Cooper Craggs	591	1,500	28.3%	+0.252	+2.162	+1.838	+3.584	−2.926	+0.638	+0.052	+0.940	−1.238	+0.560	−0.250
Deng Majak	194	1,896	9.3%	−12.014	−7.716	+4.426	−8.34	−2.232	+0.246	+10.594	−3.080	−4.612	−3.310	+12.94
Jack Hoth	120	1,971	5.7%	+8.982	+7.586	−1.456	+0.354	+8.498	+1.824	+2.266	−4.890	+4.690	−1.724	+23.80

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tuburu Naivalurua	1,664	426	79.6%	-4.840	107.144	111.936	50.3%46	34.9%66	18.6%36	30.5%52	52.3%42	66.6%38	16.5%46	26.6%58
Allen Mukeba	1,591	500	76.1%	-1.944	108.146	110.042	50.6%46	37.3%74	18.8%34	28.6%46	51.4%46	66.3%38	16.9%48	23.8%66
DQ Cole	1,569	521	75.1%	-3.640	107.746	111.338	50.4%46	36.0%70	18.4%36	29.0%46	51.3%48	66.1%38	16.4%44	27.1%56
Isaiah Jones	1,124	967	53.7%	4.756	111.254	106.552	50.8%46	39.7%80	19.6%28	34.4%62	50.2%50	65.1%34	18.8%62	27.0%56
Jayson Woodrich	1,004	1,087	48.0%	-6.436	105.540	111.936	49.4%40	35.0%66	17.8%40	26.8%40	52.2%42	67.5%42	16.2%44	29.6%48
Jaylen Jones	965	1,126	46.2%	-5.738	109.650	115.330	51.1%48	34.8%66	17.1%46	30.0%50	52.7%40	62.4%24	17.1%50	29.7%48
Malcolm Christie	912	1,179	43.6%	-18.320	105.440	123.716	48.1%34	34.9%66	17.4%44	29.0%46	55.1%28	59.3%16	15.9%42	27.4%56
Nassim Mashhour	661	1,430	31.6%	-1.744	108.748	110.440	52.1%54	29.2%44	17.7%42	43.3%80	50.3%50	65.9%38	16.8%48	30.2%46
Cooper Craggs	591	1,500	28.3%	-4.640	109.350	113.932	52.7%56	33.5%62	18.8%34	31.0%52	52.5%40	64.0%30	17.1%50	27.8%54
Deng Majak	194	1,896	9.3%	-15.722	100.830	116.626	42.6%16	33.6%62	18.5%36	40.5%74	49.1%56	60.7%20	13.7%26	39.6%24
Jack Hoth	120	1,971	5.7%	3.654	114.964	111.338	50.5%46	43.5%90	20.0%26	33.0%58	47.3%66	69.2%52	15.1%36	50.5%10

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tuburu Naivalurua	1,664	426	79.6%	-4.840	110.552	115.330	49.6%40	38.2%76	17.1%46	32.7%58	50.1%50	58.6%14	17.5%54	33.2%38
Allen Mukeba	1,591	500	76.1%	-14.024	106.844	120.920	48.8%38	30.4%48	16.8%48	39.0%72	53.2%38	60.4%18	16.3%44	41.5%20
DQ Cole	1,569	521	75.1%	-8.732	108.046	116.626	49.7%40	34.4%64	18.2%38	37.1%68	53.6%36	61.2%20	17.7%54	30.6%46
Isaiah Jones	1,124	967	53.7%	-15.822	103.936	119.722	49.5%40	30.9%50	16.9%48	27.0%40	53.7%34	64.7%32	14.3%30	29.0%50
Jayson Woodrich	1,004	1,087	48.0%	-3.342	110.052	113.334	51.0%48	36.2%70	18.8%34	34.9%64	51.5%46	62.6%26	17.2%50	26.4%58
Jaylen Jones	965	1,126	46.2%	-4.140	106.242	110.342	49.4%40	36.3%70	19.4%30	31.8%54	51.1%48	67.0%42	16.4%44	26.5%58
Malcolm Christie	912	1,179	43.6%	5.356	109.752	104.456	51.9%52	36.2%70	19.0%32	32.5%58	49.2%56	69.0%50	17.3%52	28.4%52
Nassim Mashhour	661	1,430	31.6%	-6.236	107.446	113.634	49.4%40	38.3%76	18.6%36	26.0%38	52.6%40	64.4%32	16.7%46	26.9%56
Cooper Craggs	591	1,500	28.3%	-4.940	107.244	112.136	49.2%38	36.4%72	18.1%38	31.0%52	51.6%46	65.3%36	16.6%46	28.0%54
Deng Majak	194	1,896	9.3%	-3.740	108.548	112.236	50.9%46	35.8%70	18.3%38	30.0%50	52.1%42	65.4%36	17.0%48	26.8%58
Jack Hoth	120	1,971	5.7%	-5.338	107.446	112.734	50.2%46	35.1%68	18.2%38	30.8%52	52.1%42	64.6%32	16.8%48	26.8%58

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.