Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Big 10
Oregon logo

Oregon

25-10NET#30Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #66Coach: Dana Altman
Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Jackson Shelstad−1.0−0.2+0.9+3.0−2.6+1.2+0.3−3.8−4.3−2.9−2.6
TJ Bamba−0.4+3.4+3.8−4.4+1.7−5.4−0.3+2.0−3.9+1.5−7.1
Keeshawn Barthelemy+0.8+6.9+6.1+2.6−0.9−2.8−0.9+3.8+1.4+0.1+9.1
Nate Bittle+10.7+5.6−5.1+2.3−2.9−3.6−4.1−6.3−3.4−1.0−2.9
Brandon Angel−11.2+0.6+11.8+3.3−5.7+0.2−5.3+2.2−6.3−3.1−5.7
Jadrian Tracey+12.3+1.8−10.5+1.7+1.1+1.7+6.5−5.3+3.4+0.4−1.8
Kwame Evans Jr.+14.3+0.1−14.2−2.5+6.9+0.7+5.0−4.9+6.3+1.6+1.3
Supreme Cook−12.5−8.0+4.5−1.6−0.0+3.0−3.0+7.1+5.3+0.6−4.1
Ra'Heim Moss−6.5−14.9−8.4−6.9−1.5+2.7−0.8+0.3+5.5+2.3−6.6
Mookie Cook−6.7−3.9+2.8−2.4+2.4+2.4+0.1+4.1−0.8+3.9+15.7
Jamari Phillips−14.3+5.8+20.1+5.3+6.3+5.9+16.4+5.0−6.1−3.1+23.2

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Jackson Shelstad9.2113.5104.353.1%33.0%16.9%33.1%48.3%67.0%17.4%27.1%
TJ Bamba9.3114.6105.351.3%34.0%15.0%32.9%49.6%66.5%18.4%25.4%
Keeshawn Barthelemy9.6115.7106.053.4%33.2%15.8%32.7%50.2%68.2%17.9%30.5%
Nate Bittle12.8115.2102.553.3%32.5%15.6%31.7%47.0%66.8%17.6%26.7%
Brandon Angel4.4113.8109.354.0%30.8%16.8%30.7%49.8%65.0%16.5%25.2%
Jadrian Tracey15.1114.399.253.4%34.0%17.5%36.1%46.4%69.3%18.1%26.7%
Kwame Evans Jr.17.9113.695.751.1%37.5%17.2%36.0%46.0%71.5%18.8%28.4%
Supreme Cook0.0107.5107.551.4%33.4%19.0%30.8%54.3%71.9%18.4%24.5%
Ra'Heim Moss4.2101.897.647.1%32.3%18.8%32.4%49.1%72.1%19.7%22.4%
Mookie Cook3.2109.9106.750.3%35.7%18.9%33.1%52.7%67.0%21.5%42.2%
Jamari Phillips-4.1119.0123.257.6%39.4%22.3%48.6%53.7%62.0%15.0%49.5%

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Jackson Shelstad10.2113.6103.450.1%35.5%15.7%32.7%52.0%71.4%20.3%29.7%
TJ Bamba9.6111.1101.555.6%32.2%20.5%33.2%47.5%70.4%16.9%32.5%
Keeshawn Barthelemy8.9108.899.950.7%34.1%18.6%33.7%46.4%66.8%17.8%21.5%
Nate Bittle2.1109.7107.650.9%35.4%19.2%35.9%53.3%70.2%18.6%29.6%
Brandon Angel15.6113.297.650.7%36.5%16.6%36.0%47.7%71.4%19.6%30.9%
Jadrian Tracey2.9112.6109.751.7%32.9%15.8%29.7%51.8%65.9%17.7%28.5%
Kwame Evans Jr.3.6113.5109.953.6%30.5%16.4%31.0%50.9%65.2%17.3%27.1%
Supreme Cook12.5115.5103.052.9%33.5%16.0%33.7%47.2%66.6%17.7%28.6%
Ra'Heim Moss10.7116.7106.054.0%33.8%16.1%33.2%48.9%66.6%17.4%29.0%
Mookie Cook9.9113.8103.952.7%33.3%16.5%33.0%48.6%67.8%17.6%26.5%
Jamari Phillips10.1113.2103.052.3%33.1%16.4%32.2%48.7%68.1%18.1%26.4%
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.