Penn9-18

IvyCoach: Steve Donahue

9-18NET#205

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tyler Perkins	1,178	336	77.8%	+0.352	+2.262	+1.938	−0.546	−2.034	−5.696	−6.320	+2.724	−0.744	+2.888	+1.938
Nick Spinoso	1,131	384	74.7%	−0.748	−9.212	−8.486	−2.130	−8.54	−2.280	−8.212	−2.978	+8.498	−2.318	−8.286
Sam Brown	1,042	473	68.8%	−10.318	−4.726	+5.622	−4.712	−3.126	−2.380	+5.380	+3.716	+1.060	−1.626	+0.944
George Smith	956	558	63.1%	+16.494	+10.392	−6.280	+4.590	−4.018	−4.796	+3.070	+2.722	+5.090	+3.088	−11.292
Clark Slajchert	954	560	63.0%	+19.598	+15.9100	−3.668	+7.098	+3.178	−2.380	+0.956	−1.262	−0.644	+1.168	+3.232
Andrew Laczkowski	533	982	35.2%	+5.270	+2.262	−3.166	−3.816	+11.9100	+0.640	+0.656	−1.060	−2.430	+0.662	−12.394
Cam Thrower	434	1,081	28.7%	−7.724	−6.820	+1.044	+0.254	+1.060	+5.32	−8.912	−2.272	−2.430	−0.544	+9.210
Ed Holland III	357	1,157	23.6%	−4.734	−6.918	−2.260	−2.030	−2.728	+2.912	+12.096	−2.070	+1.464	−0.150	+7.016
Reese McMullen	324	1,191	21.4%	+4.668	+3.166	−1.458	+4.088	+3.682	+4.36	−4.526	−4.588	−2.330	−1.330	+0.646
Johnnie Walter	252	1,262	16.7%	−8.922	−8.912	−0.150	−3.618	+3.076	+5.52	+1.158	+0.742	−3.024	+1.472	+0.744
Niklas Polonowski	199	1,316	13.1%	−30.82	−15.64	+15.22	−4.712	−13.32	+1.130	+6.786	+5.08	+0.858	−4.46	+9.310
Augustus Gerhart	184	1,331	12.1%	−2.740	+11.596	+14.22	+3.282	+5.992	−0.962	+3.370	+1.930	−8.44	−1.824	+6.816

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tyler Perkins	1,178	336	77.8%	-6.736	110.252	116.926	51.8%54	32.7%58	16.4%50	26.6%40	55.6%26	69.4%52	15.4%40	27.3%54
Nick Spinoso	1,131	384	74.7%	-6.836	107.346	114.132	51.4%50	30.9%52	17.1%46	25.8%38	54.2%32	71.8%64	14.2%30	24.6%64
Sam Brown	1,042	473	68.8%	-10.130	108.248	118.322	50.4%48	32.2%56	16.9%46	29.5%50	56.2%24	69.9%54	14.3%32	27.1%56
George Smith	956	558	63.1%	-0.944	113.562	114.430	53.6%62	31.7%54	15.9%54	29.0%48	55.9%24	71.3%60	15.8%42	23.0%68
Clark Slajchert	954	560	63.0%	0.548	115.666	115.130	54.5%66	34.4%64	16.8%48	28.2%46	54.5%30	69.3%52	15.2%38	28.0%52
Andrew Laczkowski	533	982	35.2%	-3.440	111.156	114.530	49.5%42	40.4%84	18.0%38	28.3%46	54.4%30	68.1%46	15.2%38	19.2%80
Cam Thrower	434	1,081	28.7%	-12.328	104.940	117.126	52.1%56	33.9%64	21.4%18	21.5%26	53.4%36	67.8%44	14.5%32	33.5%34
Ed Holland III	357	1,157	23.6%	-10.430	104.440	114.830	50.3%46	31.1%52	19.9%26	37.3%68	53.4%36	70.6%58	14.8%34	32.2%40
Reese McMullen	324	1,191	21.4%	-3.240	112.158	115.330	55.1%68	36.1%72	21.0%20	24.3%34	51.5%44	67.7%44	13.8%28	27.3%54
Johnnie Walter	252	1,262	16.7%	-14.224	102.234	116.426	48.9%40	35.7%70	22.2%16	28.8%48	55.5%26	67.1%42	15.9%44	27.3%54
Niklas Polonowski	199	1,316	13.1%	-33.78	96.222	129.88	47.8%34	21.6%18	18.6%34	33.8%60	59.3%14	70.2%56	11.0%14	34.9%32
Augustus Gerhart	184	1,331	12.1%	-8.932	119.876	128.78	54.7%66	38.3%80	16.9%46	30.8%52	56.6%22	62.3%24	13.2%26	32.7%38

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tyler Perkins	1,178	336	77.8%	-7.036	108.048	114.930	52.3%56	34.8%66	22.0%18	32.9%58	52.9%38	70.1%54	12.6%22	25.3%60
Nick Spinoso	1,131	384	74.7%	-6.036	116.570	122.516	53.5%62	39.5%82	19.3%30	34.0%62	57.1%20	63.4%28	16.5%46	32.8%38
Sam Brown	1,042	473	68.8%	0.246	112.960	112.734	55.2%68	35.4%70	19.2%30	24.2%34	52.5%40	68.9%50	15.9%42	26.2%58
George Smith	956	558	63.1%	-17.322	103.236	120.520	49.1%40	35.7%70	20.6%22	26.0%38	53.2%36	66.3%38	12.8%24	34.2%34
Clark Slajchert	954	560	63.0%	-19.020	99.628	118.622	47.5%34	31.3%52	19.1%32	27.3%42	55.7%26	69.9%54	14.1%30	24.8%62
Andrew Laczkowski	533	982	35.2%	-8.632	108.950	117.524	53.4%60	28.5%40	17.4%42	27.6%44	55.3%26	70.4%56	14.6%34	31.5%42
Cam Thrower	434	1,081	28.7%	-4.638	111.656	116.228	51.8%54	32.9%58	16.1%52	30.4%52	55.6%26	70.2%56	14.9%36	24.3%64
Ed Holland III	357	1,157	23.6%	-5.638	111.356	116.926	52.4%56	33.8%64	16.9%46	25.3%36	55.4%26	69.2%50	14.8%36	25.2%60
Reese McMullen	324	1,191	21.4%	-7.734	109.050	116.726	51.1%50	32.5%58	16.7%48	28.8%48	56.0%24	70.0%54	15.1%38	26.7%56
Johnnie Walter	252	1,262	16.7%	-5.338	111.256	116.426	52.5%56	32.6%58	16.7%48	27.7%44	54.9%28	70.1%54	14.6%34	26.7%56
Niklas Polonowski	199	1,316	13.1%	-2.942	111.758	114.630	52.5%56	34.9%66	17.5%42	27.1%42	54.4%30	69.4%52	15.3%40	25.7%60
Augustus Gerhart	184	1,331	12.1%	-6.236	108.348	114.530	51.5%52	32.5%58	17.7%40	27.5%42	54.7%30	70.7%58	15.1%38	25.8%58

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.