Princeton17-11

IvyCoach: Mitch Henderson

17-11NET#179

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Xaivian Lee	1,415	239	85.6%	+4.468	+13.898	+9.48	+4.692	+4.888	−2.584	−4.626	+6.82	+2.978	−1.724	−9.190
Caden Pierce	1,388	266	83.9%	+11.088	+11.796	+0.746	+3.080	+1.464	−3.190	+0.656	−0.960	−2.824	−1.132	−2.464
Blake Peters	1,315	339	79.5%	−5.630	+9.492	+14.92	+6.298	−1.142	+0.540	+2.566	+2.324	−1.932	−5.42	+7.314
Dalen Davis	1,062	592	64.2%	−5.530	−5.126	+0.446	−2.426	−3.124	−0.150	−0.748	+1.038	−0.744	+1.678	+1.144
Jackson Hicke	709	945	42.9%	+3.162	+4.976	+1.838	+3.080	+0.556	−0.456	−9.98	+2.028	+0.860	+1.576	+3.730
Philip Byriel	663	991	40.1%	−0.948	−1.544	−0.652	−1.138	−5.610	−3.290	−6.518	−2.776	−1.932	−1.230	−5.780
Malik Abdullahi	474	1,179	28.7%	+12.590	−0.448	−12.896	+0.960	−2.132	+0.542	+1.460	−8.898	+0.960	−0.150	−3.568
CJ Happy	329	1,325	19.9%	−8.222	−9.212	−1.054	−2.526	+0.858	+4.62	−4.924	+1.730	+4.992	−1.428	−12.194
Jack Scott	267	1,387	16.1%	−11.016	−10.98	+0.248	−5.38	+5.090	+3.96	+5.682	+2.324	+4.590	−0.542	−10.392
Jack Stanton	225	1,429	13.6%	+5.472	−3.732	−9.190	−6.16	+8.698	−0.456	+1.864	−0.556	+1.060	+6.2100	+16.02
Jacob Huggins	211	1,442	12.8%	−8.322	−4.826	+3.530	−2.228	+0.858	−0.454	+18.9100	+4.78	−2.230	+1.068	−2.362
Peyton Seals	164	1,489	9.9%	+1.154	+1.660	+0.546	+1.870	+2.372	+1.724	+12.798	+2.522	−5.012	+4.998	+29.10

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Xaivian Lee	1,415	239	85.6%	0.548	108.950	108.446	52.3%54	27.2%36	15.1%62	23.6%30	54.2%32	75.1%78	17.1%50	29.4%50
Caden Pierce	1,388	266	83.9%	1.650	108.848	107.250	52.1%54	26.7%34	15.0%62	24.4%32	53.1%38	74.2%74	17.1%50	30.3%46
Blake Peters	1,315	339	79.5%	-1.444	108.850	110.242	53.0%58	26.3%32	15.6%58	24.8%34	53.7%34	74.2%74	16.2%44	32.1%42
Dalen Davis	1,062	592	64.2%	-2.244	105.140	107.350	50.8%46	25.4%28	15.4%58	24.0%32	53.6%36	74.4%74	17.9%56	31.0%44
Jackson Hicke	709	945	42.9%	1.650	109.752	108.246	53.3%60	26.8%34	15.2%60	18.7%18	54.4%32	75.2%78	18.1%58	32.8%40
Philip Byriel	663	991	40.1%	-0.746	106.042	106.850	51.0%48	23.2%22	13.6%72	20.4%22	51.6%46	73.5%70	16.6%46	27.2%56
Malik Abdullahi	474	1,179	28.7%	8.462	106.744	98.270	52.3%54	25.0%26	15.8%56	25.3%36	47.2%66	75.3%78	17.2%50	28.2%52
CJ Happy	329	1,325	19.9%	-6.836	99.528	106.352	49.6%40	27.2%36	19.2%32	20.4%22	54.6%32	78.6%88	16.1%42	21.0%74
Jack Scott	267	1,387	16.1%	-9.530	97.824	107.350	47.2%30	30.7%50	18.7%34	29.0%46	55.1%28	78.5%86	16.9%48	22.1%72
Jack Stanton	225	1,429	13.6%	4.554	103.736	99.368	46.4%28	33.8%62	15.1%62	25.8%38	52.8%40	75.5%78	22.7%84	44.8%16
Jacob Huggins	211	1,442	12.8%	-7.434	102.734	110.242	49.7%40	27.2%36	15.2%62	40.9%76	57.3%20	72.7%66	18.2%58	28.7%52
Peyton Seals	164	1,489	9.9%	0.848	108.448	107.648	53.3%60	28.6%42	17.0%46	35.8%66	55.6%28	70.1%56	21.8%80	57.3%6

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Xaivian Lee	1,415	239	85.6%	-3.940	95.120	99.070	47.7%32	22.4%20	17.6%42	28.3%44	47.3%66	72.2%66	18.8%62	38.5%26
Caden Pierce	1,388	266	83.9%	-9.430	97.122	106.650	49.1%38	25.4%28	18.1%38	23.8%30	54.0%34	77.0%84	18.3%58	32.7%40
Blake Peters	1,315	339	79.5%	4.154	99.528	95.376	46.8%28	27.4%36	15.1%62	22.3%26	51.4%46	76.1%80	21.5%78	24.8%64
Dalen Davis	1,062	592	64.2%	3.352	110.252	106.850	53.2%58	28.6%42	15.5%58	24.7%34	52.6%40	75.1%78	16.3%44	29.9%48
Jackson Hicke	709	945	42.9%	-1.544	104.838	106.452	50.4%46	26.3%32	15.7%58	28.6%46	52.4%40	74.3%74	16.7%46	29.1%50
Philip Byriel	663	991	40.1%	0.246	107.546	107.348	52.1%54	28.8%42	16.8%48	26.9%40	54.3%32	75.4%78	17.8%54	32.9%40
Malik Abdullahi	474	1,179	28.7%	-4.040	107.044	111.140	51.4%50	27.1%36	15.3%60	23.9%30	56.0%26	74.3%74	17.3%52	31.7%42
CJ Happy	329	1,325	19.9%	1.450	108.848	107.350	52.2%54	26.4%32	14.6%66	25.2%36	52.9%38	73.7%72	17.6%54	33.0%38
Jack Scott	267	1,387	16.1%	1.650	108.748	107.150	52.5%56	25.7%30	14.9%64	23.4%30	52.9%38	73.9%74	17.4%52	32.4%40
Jack Stanton	225	1,429	13.6%	-0.946	107.446	108.346	52.6%56	25.3%28	15.5%58	24.0%32	53.3%36	74.5%74	16.5%44	28.7%52
Jacob Huggins	211	1,442	12.8%	0.948	107.546	106.750	51.9%52	26.4%32	15.5%58	22.0%26	52.6%40	74.9%76	17.2%50	30.9%44
Peyton Seals	164	1,489	9.9%	-0.346	106.844	107.150	51.5%50	26.3%32	15.3%60	23.1%28	53.0%38	75.1%78	16.8%48	28.2%54

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.