Team Stats
36 games- Net Rating21.598
- Offensive Rating132.093
- Defensive Rating110.559
- Pace58.39
- Effective FG%58.7%99
- Off Rebound Pct29.2%55
- Turnover Pct17.0%91
- FT Attempt Rate30.4%25
Team Stats
36 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating21.598
- Offensive Rating132.093
- Defensive Rating110.559
- Pace58.39
- Effective FG%58.7%99
- Off Rebound Pct29.2%55
- Turnover Pct17.0%91
- FT Attempt Rate30.4%25
Results & Margin
- Win Pct83.3%98
- Point Margin / Game12.598
- Points / Game77.079
- Points Allowed / Game64.597
- 1st Half Margin7.697
- 2nd Half Margin4.995
- Avg Largest Lead18.197
- Avg Largest Deficit5.199
Box Score
- Points / Game77.079
- Rebounds / Game33.732
- Assists / Game15.587
- ORebs / Game8.315
- DRebs / Game25.460
- Steals / Game4.45
- Blocks / Game2.624
- Turnovers / Game9.998
- PFs / Game15.495
Shooting
- FGMs / Game28.291
- FGAs / Game54.714
- Field Goal Pct51.5%100
- 2PMs / Game20.389
- 2PAs / Game35.541
- 2-Point Pct57.1%98
- 3PMs / Game7.960
- 3PAs / Game19.221
- 3-Point Pct41.0%99
- FTMs / Game12.832
- FTAs / Game16.615
- Free Throw Pct76.9%93
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s52.7%76
- % Pts from 3s30.7%49
- % Pts from FTs16.6%14
- Paint Pts / Game19.832
- % Pts in Paint25.8%28
- Fast Break Pts / Game1.57
- % Pts on Fast Break1.9%5
- Points off TOVs / Game7.616
- % Pts off TOVs9.9%13
- 1st Half Pts / Game36.682
- 2nd Half Pts / Game36.427
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %62.1%99
- Points / Shot1.4199
- 3-Point Att Rate35.1%32
- Assist Pct54.9%71
- Assists / 100 Poss26.594
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.56x99
- PF Drawn / Game16.413
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%49.2%77
- Opp True Shooting %52.4%85
- Opp Field Goal Pct44.2%51
- Opp 2-Point Pct49.5%55
- Opp 3-Point Pct32.3%91
- Opp 3PA Rate31.0%97
- Opp FT Att Rate24.8%97
- Opp Points / Shot1.1693
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game64.597
- Paint Pts Allowed15.479
- Fast Break Pts Allowed1.889
- Pts off TOVs Allowed6.787
- Opp Assist Pct48.0%82
- TOVs Forced / Game9.61
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct77.6%98
- Turnovers Forced Pct16.4%7
- Steal Pct7.6%14
- Block Pct4.5%34
- Hakeem Pct12.1%13
- PF Efficiency0.94x71
- Steals / PF0.29x24
- Blocks / PF0.17x46
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 351 D-I teams- #3TS%61.5%
- #4eFG%58.7%
- #43P%41.0%
- #7Pts Diff+451
- #8Opp OREB%22.4%
- #10Adj ORtg119.6
- #12REB Diff+226
- #17TOV%15.6%
- #3TS%61.5%
- #4eFG%58.7%
- #43P%41.0%
- #7Pts Diff+451
- #8Opp OREB%22.4%
- #10Adj ORtg119.6
- #12REB Diff+226
- #17TOV%15.6%
- #335Opp TOV%15.1%
- #270FB Pts %3.7%
- #261FTAR30.4%
- #158OREB%29.2%
- #154SOS-0.2
- #113Adj DRtg102.9
- #104AST%54.9%
- #79Opp eFG%49.2%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2017-18- 1

UCLA 2020-2122-10Pac 12Most alike in TOV%, Tempo, Adj O74 - 2

Notre Dame 2015-1624-12ACCMost alike in Adj O, TOV%, FT rate72 - 3

Butler 2019-2022-9Big EastMost alike in FT rate, Tempo, OREB%72 - 4

Michigan St. 2022-2321-13Big 10Most alike in Opp eFG%, Opp TOV%, FT rate71 - 5

Missouri St. 2021-2222-11MVCMost alike in FT rate, Opp eFG%, TOV%71 - 6

Michigan 2020-2123-5Big 10Most alike in Adj O, Opp TOV%, 3PA rate70 - 7

North Dakota St.NDSU 2013-1423-7SummitMost alike in TOV%, Adj O, OREB%70 - 8

Northern IowaUNI 2019-2023-6MVCMost alike in OREB%, Adj O, Opp OREB%70 - 9

Wisconsin 2023-2422-14Big 10Most alike in 3PA rate, OREB%, Adj O67 - 10

Utah St. 2013-1417-14MWCMost alike in 3PA rate, Opp eFG%, OREB%66
| J. LandaleJock Landale | Sr | 6'11" | +2.298 | – | – | 67.7%92 | 30.1%98 | 21.1 | 10.2 | 2.0 | 30.0% | 74.6% |
| E. NaarEmmett Naar | Sr | 6'1" | +0.982 | – | – | 56.9%64 | 20.8%70 | 9.5 | 2.4 | 7.9 | 39.7% | 84.6% |
| T. KrebsTanner Krebs | So | 6'6" | +0.880 | – | – | 59.0%73 | 13.7%21 | 7.7 | 5.2 | 1.0 | 39.6% | 83.3% |
| C. HermansonCalvin Hermanson | Sr | 6'6" | +0.878 | – | – | 65.4%89 | 15.6%33 | 11.3 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 44.3% | 78.7% |
| J. FordJordan Ford | So | 6'1" | +0.776 | – | – | 61.8%82 | 18.8%55 | 11.1 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 44.3% | 75.4% |
| K. ClarkKyle Clark | Jr | 6'7" | +0.674 | – | – | 67.6%92 | 8.4%5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| E. FitznerEvan Fitzner | Jr | 6'10" | +0.465 | – | – | 60.1%77 | 16.2%37 | 5.0 | 2.8 | 0.3 | 40.0% | 86.4% |
| J. HunterJordan Hunter | Jr | 6'10" | – | – | – | 59.5%75 | 24.1%86 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.0% | 56.5% |
| D. SheetsDan Sheets | So | 6'5" | – | – | – | 50.0%29 | 15.1%30 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| C. NealCullen Neal | Sr | 6'4" | – | – | – | 54.9%53 | 22.2%77 | 5.3 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 36.1% | 79.7% |
| T. KuhseTommy Kuhse | So | 6'2" | – | – | – | 50.6%32 | 12.8%17 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| J. PerryJock Perry | So | 7'1" | – | – | – | 65.0%89 | 26.2%92 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 35.3% | 72.7% |
| E. ThomasElijah Thomas | Fr | 6'5" | – | – | – | 59.0%73 | 14.2%24 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 43.5% | 57.1% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27-6 | #25 | 20.593 | 118.986 | 98.496 | 4.976 | +34199 | +5280 | 37.2%95 | +2331 | 53.2%70 | 39.0%98 | 79.8%100 | |
| 29-6 | #19 | 20.494 | 116.085 | 95.697 | 5.577 | +360100 | +3268 | 39.7%99 | -3264 | 50.4%35 | 32.0%20 | 69.5%25 | |
| 26-8 | #16 | 21.096 | 116.592 | 95.598 | 2.470 | +402100 | +9196 | 39.4%99 | -2259 | 53.1%81 | 35.2%68 | 67.6%12 | |
| 27-8 | #10 | 19.597 | 111.482 | 92.099 | 6.282 | +23398 | +7289 | 32.7%83 | -6382 | 52.2%70 | 36.5%83 | 69.4%25 | |
| 26-8 | #19 | 17.694 | 110.483 | 92.997 | 6.582 | +14485 | +7190 | 27.8%44 | -4875 | 52.8%79 | 35.3%74 | 75.8%89 | |
| 25-8 | #37 | 14.990 | 115.098 | 100.166 | 4.676 | +5962 | +7289 | 25.2%22 | -6583 | 55.1%96 | 39.6%99 | 75.4%89 | |
| 22-12 | #27 | 16.092 | 114.693 | 98.684 | 5.680 | +18593 | +6788 | 31.1%74 | -249 | 53.8%84 | 37.8%91 | 74.2%82 | |
| 30-6 | #27 | 16.893 | 120.097 | 103.268 | 0.061 | +22695 | +8491 | 29.2%51 | +1237 | 58.7%99 | 41.0%98 | 76.9%94 | |
| 29-5 | #14 | 23.696 | 118.697 | 95.093 | 2.673 | +305100 | +144100 | 33.1%83 | +4722 | 57.8%99 | 39.4%94 | 74.5%87 | |
| 28-6 | #22 | 19.094 | 118.197 | 99.281 | 0.964 | +17788 | +9997 | 30.2%52 | -250 | 58.4%99 | 40.6%98 | 68.8%38 | |
| 20-10 | #64 | 9.179 | 108.683 | 99.570 | 3.274 | +21396 | +4986 | 33.6%71 | +728 | 52.6%85 | 37.3%82 | 71.5%73 | |
| 22-12 | #59 | 10.883 | 112.989 | 102.170 | 4.374 | +14286 | +8593 | 36.1%89 | -150 | 51.8%75 | 38.4%89 | 70.8%58 | |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-IShot Profile
vs D-IShot Clock
9 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 351 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 17-18. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 17-18. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.








