Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
WCC
San Francisco logo

San Francisco

23-11NET#58Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #80Coach: Chris Gerlufsen
Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Marcus Williams+4.3+2.4−1.9+4.3−4.8−0.7−3.9+1.1+2.1−0.3−16.6
Jonathan Mogbo+9.8+11.6+1.8+3.0+3.9−3.8+2.2+1.3−4.6+2.2−2.3
Ndewedo Newbury+20.2+9.0−11.2+7.8−5.1−1.1−4.9−5.0+7.8−0.7−16.9
Mike Sharavjamts+8.0+4.1−3.9+5.0−1.7+1.1−6.7−2.6−1.3+1.4−11.0
Malik Thomas−2.7+2.1+4.8−0.4+0.6−0.3+4.8+2.1−0.4−2.2+0.9
Ryan Beasley−5.2−0.6+4.6−1.3−1.1−0.9+4.2+2.2−4.2+1.1+11.0
Isaiah Hawthorne+4.3−2.9−7.2−0.6+3.9+2.2−2.3+0.4+6.5+2.1−5.4
Josh Kunen−15.5−18.0−2.5−9.5−3.8+1.4−2.5+3.3+4.2+2.8−5.4
Stefan Todorovic−7.8−5.3+2.5−3.2+4.5+3.2+3.7−0.4−5.6+1.6+10.9
Robby Beasley−17.6−6.2+11.4−2.9−9.0−4.2−4.4+1.6−0.9−4.1+18.9
Volodymyr Markovetskyy−17.8−12.1+5.6−6.6+1.3+2.1−3.1−3.8−3.3−6.7+10.7
Justin Bieker+15.1+17.0+1.9+2.4+17.0+0.9+23.3−0.7−1.0−0.6+14.5
Junjie Wang−12.2−6.7+5.5−5.6+4.4+0.8−3.4−2.1−6.8−0.5+27.3

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Marcus Williams14.7114.8100.156.0%31.5%17.0%22.6%49.3%70.5%21.1%34.1%
Jonathan Mogbo16.3117.2100.955.8%33.5%16.1%23.9%49.5%68.8%21.7%36.7%
Ndewedo Newbury20.6117.396.757.8%30.6%16.7%21.7%47.5%72.6%20.9%31.7%
Mike Sharavjamts16.7115.899.157.0%31.8%17.5%20.9%48.2%69.6%21.6%33.5%
Malik Thomas12.6115.3102.754.9%32.7%17.0%25.6%50.1%69.9%20.1%37.7%
Ryan Beasley11.0114.0103.054.4%31.9%16.6%25.7%50.4%67.8%21.7%43.3%
Isaiah Hawthorne16.9112.395.454.7%35.3%18.7%21.7%49.4%74.9%22.6%33.3%
Josh Kunen2.6101.398.748.3%29.8%18.1%21.6%51.5%73.2%23.1%33.3%
Stefan Todorovic7.1109.8102.752.3%36.3%19.9%26.6%48.8%65.2%22.5%46.8%
Robby Beasley-1.5108.9110.452.6%24.6%13.4%19.6%50.5%69.3%17.5%53.8%
Volodymyr Markovetskyy-1.8103.6105.449.3%33.6%19.0%20.6%45.8%67.3%15.3%46.5%
Justin Bieker27.5129.7102.257.3%47.7%18.0%44.4%48.4%69.2%20.5%50.3%
Junjie Wang2.6108.2105.650.0%36.5%17.8%20.3%47.2%63.9%20.6%62.4%

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Marcus Williams10.4112.4102.051.7%36.3%17.7%26.5%48.2%68.4%21.4%50.7%
Jonathan Mogbo6.5105.799.252.9%29.6%20.0%21.8%48.1%73.5%19.5%39.0%
Ndewedo Newbury0.4108.3107.949.9%35.8%17.8%26.7%52.5%64.8%21.6%48.6%
Mike Sharavjamts8.7111.7103.051.9%33.5%16.4%27.7%50.8%70.9%20.2%44.4%
Malik Thomas15.3113.297.955.4%32.2%17.3%20.7%48.0%70.3%22.3%36.8%
Ryan Beasley16.2114.698.455.7%33.0%17.5%21.5%48.1%72.0%20.6%32.3%
Isaiah Hawthorne12.6115.1102.555.3%31.4%16.5%24.0%49.0%68.4%20.5%38.8%
Josh Kunen18.1119.3101.257.7%33.6%16.7%24.1%48.2%69.0%20.3%38.7%
Stefan Todorovic14.9115.1100.255.6%31.8%16.7%22.9%49.2%70.8%20.9%35.9%
Robby Beasley16.1115.199.055.5%33.6%17.6%24.0%48.9%70.2%21.6%34.9%
Volodymyr Markovetskyy16.0115.899.855.9%32.3%16.8%23.8%49.6%70.6%22.0%35.8%
Justin Bieker12.3112.6100.354.9%30.7%17.0%21.1%49.2%70.2%21.2%35.8%
Junjie Wang14.9114.9100.055.6%32.1%17.0%23.7%49.3%70.7%21.2%35.1%
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.