Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
San Francisco logoSan Francisco logoSan Francisco logoSan Francisco logo

San Francisco24-10

WCCCoach: Chris Gerlufsen

24-10NET#68

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Malik Thomas−5.332+1.962+7.214+5.696−3.818+0.738−7.912+1.434+1.062−2.812+8.810
Tyrone Riley IV+12.290+7.486−4.976+3.584+4.186−1.876−1.940−0.352+0.658+1.272−3.468
Marcus Williams−9.520+3.770+13.22+0.354−1.042−1.064−1.642+5.16−8.94+2.082+4.424
Carlton Linguard Jr.−1.644−1.244+0.448−0.050−0.744−1.674−14.14+0.542−0.546−0.446+0.348
Ryan Beasley+0.050−5.922−5.980−2.326−1.934+0.934−1.840−0.554+3.180+1.272+0.646
Junjie Wang−0.548−2.736−2.262−0.942+1.868+0.836−10.18+0.940+4.188−0.936+1.442
James O'Donnell−4.834−5.622−0.854−1.932−5.610+0.936+5.078−1.666−0.842+0.254−3.066
Robby Beasley+1.256−2.638−3.870−0.940−6.38−0.964+16.2100−3.986+1.566−0.544+4.424
Veniamin Abosi+8.782+14.798+6.018+2.274+1.364−3.994+10.194−1.768+1.364−5.02+5.520
Ndewedo Newbury+6.374+3.972−2.462+6.698−0.546+2.912−0.648+1.730−0.448+3.996−11.994
Jason Rivera-Torres−9.020−15.64−6.582−8.24+5.992+4.92+1.260−2.274−1.040+1.678−12.696

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Malik Thomas7.560114.162106.65054.2%6230.8%5017.4%4432.7%5849.2%5668.9%5017.6%5438.0%28
Tyrone Riley IV12.368115.966103.65854.1%6232.9%5816.7%4833.8%6048.8%5868.8%5018.6%6035.2%34
Marcus Williams5.456114.964109.54453.2%5831.4%5216.9%4833.8%6050.6%5065.7%3618.9%6237.6%28
Carlton Linguard Jr.8.060113.260105.25453.1%5831.4%5216.6%5028.7%4649.1%5668.4%4818.1%5836.3%30
Ryan Beasley8.762110.954102.36252.0%5230.8%5017.7%4233.4%6048.7%5870.1%5618.8%6236.5%30
Junjie Wang8.462112.458104.05852.7%5632.6%5817.6%4229.4%4849.3%5670.7%5817.8%5436.9%30
James O'Donnell5.356109.852104.55651.7%5227.8%3817.9%4037.9%7047.8%6468.1%4618.3%6034.1%36
Robby Beasley9.564111.756102.26252.4%5427.0%3416.6%5046.7%8446.0%7069.7%5417.9%5639.5%24
Veniamin Abosi15.272124.884109.54454.7%6632.7%5814.3%6841.8%7847.6%6469.6%5414.5%3240.2%22
Ndewedo Newbury13.970116.968103.06058.6%8031.3%5219.6%2833.8%6050.3%5068.3%4621.4%7826.3%58
Jason Rivera-Torres1.148100.83099.66846.2%2636.6%7221.3%2035.3%6447.0%6667.8%4419.6%6825.8%60

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Malik Thomas12.968112.25899.36848.6%3634.7%6616.7%4840.6%7647.8%6267.8%4420.5%7229.2%50
Tyrone Riley IV0.046108.548108.54650.5%4628.8%4218.5%3635.6%6649.1%5668.2%4617.4%5238.6%26
Marcus Williams15.072111.35496.37452.9%5832.4%5617.9%4035.4%6445.5%7274.6%7416.9%4833.2%38
Carlton Linguard Jr.9.664114.462104.85453.1%5832.1%5618.2%3842.7%7848.6%6068.9%5018.4%6036.0%32
Ryan Beasley8.762116.968108.24654.3%6432.7%5816.7%4835.3%6449.2%5667.0%4217.6%5435.9%32
Junjie Wang8.962115.164106.25253.5%6030.8%5016.8%4839.5%7448.5%6066.6%3818.7%6235.5%34
James O'Donnell10.164115.464105.35453.6%6033.4%6217.0%4632.8%5849.4%5668.9%5018.2%5837.1%28
Robby Beasley8.362114.462106.05253.3%6033.3%5817.5%4430.5%5249.9%5468.3%4618.4%6035.0%34
Veniamin Abosi6.558110.052103.55852.5%5631.4%5218.2%3831.8%5449.3%5668.3%4619.5%6634.7%34
Ndewedo Newbury7.660113.060105.55452.0%5231.8%5416.7%4834.4%6248.6%6068.7%4817.6%5438.3%26
Jason Rivera-Torres10.264116.366106.15254.4%6430.7%5016.4%5234.1%6249.3%5668.8%5018.0%5638.4%26
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.