South Florida24-9

AmericanCoach: Chris Mack

24-9NET#45

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Wes Enis	1,754	410	81.1%	−6.526	−4.030	+2.534	−4.116	−4.514	−2.182	+0.354	−2.474	−7.64	−1.426	−6.482
Joseph Pinion	1,635	529	75.6%	+10.486	+4.274	−6.282	+2.778	+4.286	−0.558	−9.510	−3.080	+0.354	+0.458	−4.172
Josh Omojafo	1,477	687	68.3%	−12.014	−9.412	+2.634	−0.940	−4.414	+2.910	+3.068	−0.758	−0.346	−3.66	−10.292
Izaiyah Nelson	1,454	709	67.2%	+12.290	+8.690	−3.670	+0.152	+3.684	−2.988	+2.164	−4.288	−3.520	+0.866	−1.258
CJ Brown	1,399	764	64.7%	+2.058	+5.278	+3.230	−0.940	+3.180	−2.384	+3.872	+1.334	−0.940	−1.130	−7.184
Isaiah Jones	816	1,348	37.7%	+14.894	+4.676	−10.392	−0.148	+3.080	−0.862	+4.476	+1.434	+6.396	+7.3100	+13.24
Daimion Collins	691	1,473	31.9%	−9.220	−8.414	+0.844	−1.338	−2.826	+1.426	−5.622	−0.454	−1.436	−2.020	−4.372
Gavin Hightower	428	1,735	19.8%	+1.456	−5.722	−7.186	+0.152	−3.918	+1.228	−5.024	−2.172	+0.152	+5.098	+11.26
Adriel Nyorha	411	1,752	19.0%	−11.814	−1.344	+10.66	+3.484	−1.042	+3.38	−0.250	+4.710	+2.576	−4.84	+1.044
Devin Haid	345	1,819	15.9%	+0.854	+5.380	+4.524	+0.860	−0.448	−1.876	−0.848	+4.78	+6.196	−1.822	−3.068
Tristan Beckford	236	1,927	10.9%	−19.84	−9.712	+10.26	−2.030	−3.818	+2.118	−1.244	+2.028	−2.128	−1.230	+7.912
Caleb Sanders	118	2,045	5.5%	+8.782	+11.296	+2.534	+7.598	+9.8100	+5.50	+11.696	+2.920	+4.892	−0.444	+14.52

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Wes Enis	1,754	410	81.1%	17.074	118.068	101.166	50.8%42	38.1%80	14.7%58	41.1%68	46.8%70	66.7%38	19.0%70	38.3%34
Joseph Pinion	1,635	529	75.6%	20.978	119.872	99.070	52.2%50	39.9%84	15.0%56	38.8%64	46.4%70	68.1%40	19.4%72	38.3%32
Josh Omojafo	1,477	687	68.3%	14.470	115.864	101.464	51.2%44	37.5%76	16.1%48	42.0%70	47.0%68	68.0%40	18.1%64	36.4%38
Izaiyah Nelson	1,454	709	67.2%	22.280	121.676	99.470	51.6%46	40.0%86	14.2%62	41.7%70	45.9%72	67.0%38	19.5%74	39.0%32
CJ Brown	1,399	764	64.7%	18.976	120.674	101.764	51.2%44	39.9%84	14.3%62	42.4%70	47.7%66	67.7%40	18.9%70	37.0%36
Isaiah Jones	816	1,348	37.7%	27.486	121.676	94.278	51.5%46	40.8%86	14.6%60	43.8%74	48.2%64	72.2%60	23.8%90	48.2%16
Daimion Collins	691	1,473	31.9%	11.966	113.056	101.166	50.7%42	37.0%76	16.1%48	37.2%60	46.9%68	67.1%38	17.9%64	36.6%38
Gavin Hightower	428	1,735	19.8%	19.378	114.258	94.978	51.6%46	35.7%72	16.1%46	37.0%60	45.5%74	68.2%40	23.3%88	48.6%16
Adriel Nyorha	411	1,752	19.0%	8.660	117.868	109.146	54.3%58	38.1%80	17.8%34	40.9%68	51.0%50	70.1%50	15.4%44	40.2%28
Devin Haid	345	1,819	15.9%	18.976	123.278	104.358	52.2%50	38.5%82	13.6%66	40.4%66	51.2%50	73.2%64	17.8%62	36.9%36
Tristan Beckford	236	1,927	10.9%	0.646	110.248	109.644	49.8%36	35.6%72	17.0%40	40.0%66	49.0%60	66.2%32	18.2%64	46.5%18
Caleb Sanders	118	2,045	5.5%	26.486	129.488	103.060	58.7%78	48.3%98	20.3%20	52.0%84	50.0%58	72.6%62	18.9%70	53.1%12

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Wes Enis	1,754	410	81.1%	23.482	122.076	98.670	54.9%62	42.6%90	16.8%40	40.8%68	49.2%58	74.3%68	20.4%78	44.7%20
Joseph Pinion	1,635	529	75.6%	10.464	115.662	105.254	49.4%36	35.8%72	15.5%52	48.3%80	49.5%58	67.8%40	19.0%70	42.5%24
Josh Omojafo	1,477	687	68.3%	26.484	125.282	98.970	52.1%50	41.9%88	13.1%70	39.1%64	47.7%66	68.2%42	21.7%84	46.5%18
Izaiyah Nelson	1,454	709	67.2%	10.062	113.056	103.060	51.5%46	36.4%74	17.1%40	39.6%64	50.1%52	70.4%52	18.8%68	40.2%28
CJ Brown	1,399	764	64.7%	16.974	115.462	98.570	52.1%50	36.9%76	16.6%42	38.5%62	46.4%70	68.6%44	20.0%76	44.1%22
Isaiah Jones	816	1,348	37.7%	12.668	117.166	104.556	51.6%46	37.8%78	15.4%52	39.4%64	46.8%70	65.9%32	16.5%52	35.0%42
Daimion Collins	691	1,473	31.9%	21.180	121.576	100.368	51.9%48	39.8%84	14.7%58	42.8%70	47.4%66	68.5%42	19.9%76	40.8%28
Gavin Hightower	428	1,735	19.8%	17.976	119.972	102.064	51.5%46	39.6%84	14.9%58	42.0%70	47.6%66	68.0%40	18.3%66	37.4%36
Adriel Nyorha	411	1,752	19.0%	20.578	119.070	98.670	50.9%44	39.1%82	14.5%60	41.1%68	46.3%72	67.6%38	20.2%78	39.2%32
Devin Haid	345	1,819	15.9%	18.176	118.068	99.968	51.4%46	39.0%82	15.4%52	41.2%68	46.4%70	67.1%38	19.6%74	39.9%30
Tristan Beckford	236	1,927	10.9%	20.478	119.872	99.568	51.7%48	39.3%84	14.9%58	41.2%68	47.0%68	68.3%42	19.4%72	38.5%32
Caleb Sanders	118	2,045	5.5%	17.776	118.268	100.568	51.2%44	38.4%80	14.8%58	40.5%66	47.1%68	67.8%40	19.3%72	38.6%32

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

South FloridaS. Florida24-9

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

South Florida24-9