Southern Utah9-19

WACCoach: Rob Jeter

9-19NET#319

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jamir Simpson	1,523	281	84.4%	−7.026	−5.424	+1.540	−4.114	+1.262	+2.416	+7.988	−0.858	−0.250	−1.034	+1.144
Brock Felder	1,119	685	62.0%	+7.780	+0.352	−7.484	+2.576	−4.116	−1.976	−9.98	−1.870	+6.496	−0.150	−6.884
Dominique Ford	1,014	790	56.2%	+9.884	+5.780	−4.172	+2.374	+0.960	−1.066	+2.566	+0.148	+3.684	+2.486	+2.138
Tavi Jackson	796	1,007	44.1%	+8.582	+7.486	−1.154	+4.490	+0.556	−0.456	−0.350	−0.454	−1.832	+1.372	−7.486
Jeffrey Langston Jr.	792	1,011	43.9%	−0.548	−2.040	−1.456	−2.128	+3.078	+1.824	+2.366	−1.870	−1.832	+1.068	+0.844
Jamari Sibley	761	1,042	42.2%	+1.958	+7.888	+5.920	+3.888	−4.018	−3.088	+3.370	+3.516	−2.032	+0.762	−0.754
Hercy Miller	674	1,129	37.4%	−7.426	−3.632	+3.828	−2.426	+5.390	+3.48	+4.174	+1.138	−4.614	+0.356	+2.834
Lorenzo Abellar	660	1,143	36.6%	+3.464	−4.626	−8.086	−1.436	−3.224	−0.658	+2.266	−4.388	+6.796	−1.624	+6.418
Robert Jeter	400	1,404	22.2%	−17.86	−12.66	+5.222	−5.58	−4.912	−0.456	−11.76	+2.820	−0.150	−1.920	−3.668
Malik Lamin	382	1,422	21.2%	−3.040	+0.052	+3.032	+0.454	+7.496	+4.24	−0.052	+0.544	−4.912	−0.838	+7.912
Duncan Reid	276	1,528	15.3%	+7.178	+7.686	+0.446	+1.566	−3.422	−2.482	+19.2100	−3.382	−1.140	−2.316	+3.430
Kai Burdick	268	1,536	14.8%	−2.642	−0.250	+2.436	−0.842	+6.796	+1.922	−2.040	+0.148	−3.718	+0.052	+0.944
Xavier Sykes	243	1,561	13.4%	−11.316	−11.28	+0.148	−4.412	−5.410	−2.078	−10.48	+3.714	+1.264	+1.880	−3.368

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jamir Simpson	1,523	281	84.4%	-14.324	95.020	109.344	46.3%28	30.9%50	22.7%14	39.2%72	49.6%56	65.6%36	15.4%38	31.8%42
Brock Felder	1,119	685	62.0%	-10.330	96.020	106.352	47.9%32	29.2%44	21.6%18	34.3%62	49.0%56	68.1%46	15.5%38	29.1%50
Dominique Ford	1,014	790	56.2%	-9.032	98.426	107.350	48.0%32	31.1%52	21.9%16	39.0%72	49.8%54	67.2%42	16.5%46	32.6%40
Tavi Jackson	796	1,007	44.1%	-8.532	100.028	108.546	49.4%40	31.0%50	22.1%16	37.8%70	49.5%56	64.6%32	16.2%44	27.5%56
Jeffrey Langston Jr.	792	1,011	43.9%	-13.526	94.818	108.346	45.8%24	32.4%56	23.3%12	39.2%72	48.7%58	64.6%32	16.1%42	32.1%42
Jamari Sibley	761	1,042	42.2%	-12.128	100.430	112.536	49.2%38	28.3%40	20.6%22	39.9%74	51.7%44	64.5%32	15.9%42	31.3%44
Hercy Miller	674	1,129	37.4%	-17.920	93.618	111.538	45.5%24	34.0%62	24.5%8	40.5%74	50.4%50	62.8%26	15.7%40	33.4%38
Lorenzo Abellar	660	1,143	36.6%	-11.128	93.016	104.058	46.1%26	28.7%42	22.0%16	39.3%72	47.0%66	69.8%54	14.5%32	35.8%32
Robert Jeter	400	1,404	22.2%	-27.112	86.110	113.134	42.8%16	27.0%34	22.0%16	28.9%46	51.9%44	65.6%36	14.0%28	28.9%52
Malik Lamin	382	1,422	21.2%	-15.622	95.920	111.538	47.3%30	36.6%72	25.7%6	37.9%70	50.1%50	61.8%22	14.9%34	37.9%28
Duncan Reid	276	1,528	15.3%	-7.234	102.334	109.444	48.3%34	27.8%38	20.3%24	54.4%90	46.9%66	64.7%32	13.5%24	34.6%36
Kai Burdick	268	1,536	14.8%	-15.424	95.720	111.138	46.3%26	36.4%72	23.9%10	36.2%66	49.8%54	62.5%24	15.6%38	32.4%40
Xavier Sykes	243	1,561	13.4%	-23.016	86.210	109.244	43.3%18	26.1%30	20.6%22	29.0%46	53.0%38	66.7%38	17.1%50	28.8%52

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jamir Simpson	1,523	281	84.4%	-7.334	100.530	107.848	50.4%46	29.7%46	20.3%24	31.3%54	50.4%50	65.8%36	16.4%44	30.7%46
Brock Felder	1,119	685	62.0%	-18.020	95.720	113.732	45.5%24	33.2%58	23.5%12	44.1%80	50.9%50	61.7%22	15.6%38	35.9%32
Dominique Ford	1,014	790	56.2%	-18.720	92.716	111.438	45.7%24	30.2%48	22.9%12	36.5%68	49.7%56	63.6%28	14.2%30	30.5%46
Tavi Jackson	796	1,007	44.1%	-16.922	92.616	109.544	45.1%22	30.5%48	22.5%14	38.0%70	49.9%54	66.4%38	15.0%34	35.0%34
Jeffrey Langston Jr.	792	1,011	43.9%	-13.026	96.722	109.742	47.9%32	29.4%44	21.6%18	36.9%68	50.5%50	66.4%38	15.1%36	31.3%44
Jamari Sibley	761	1,042	42.2%	-14.026	92.616	106.552	45.4%24	32.3%56	23.6%10	36.5%68	48.3%62	66.4%38	15.2%36	32.0%42
Hercy Miller	674	1,129	37.4%	-10.430	97.222	107.748	47.9%32	28.7%42	21.1%20	36.4%68	49.4%56	67.4%42	15.4%38	30.6%46
Lorenzo Abellar	660	1,143	36.6%	-14.524	97.524	112.036	47.5%32	31.9%54	22.6%14	37.1%68	51.3%48	63.1%26	16.1%42	29.4%50
Robert Jeter	400	1,404	22.2%	-9.332	98.726	107.948	48.3%34	31.9%54	22.4%14	40.6%76	49.1%56	65.6%36	15.9%42	32.5%40
Malik Lamin	382	1,422	21.2%	-12.626	95.920	108.446	46.9%28	29.2%44	21.5%18	37.9%70	49.6%56	66.7%42	15.7%40	30.0%48
Duncan Reid	276	1,528	15.3%	-14.324	94.718	109.044	46.8%28	31.2%52	22.7%14	35.2%64	50.3%50	65.8%36	15.9%42	31.1%44
Kai Burdick	268	1,536	14.8%	-12.826	95.920	108.746	47.1%30	29.6%46	22.1%16	38.2%70	49.7%56	66.2%38	15.5%38	31.5%42
Xavier Sykes	243	1,561	13.4%	-11.728	97.424	109.144	47.6%32	31.5%52	22.6%14	39.4%72	49.2%56	65.5%36	15.3%36	32.1%42

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Southern UtahSUU9-19

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Southern Utah9-19